Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Dual-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography

Randomized Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Dual-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01625533
Enrollment
576
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2015-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Angiography, Rotational Coronary Angiography, Contrast media, Radiation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by directly comparing it to standard coronary angiography (SA).

Detailed description

Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) was developed as an innovative adaptation of rotational angiography (RA), but it requires a longer coronary injection compared to standard coronary angiography (SA). The risk of complications from the contrast agent (such as discomfort, warmth, pain, hypotension and bradycardia) is increased with the use of DARCA. It remains to be evaluated whether this approach is also suitable for coronary angiography, especially using in the patients with complex coronary lesions. Previous studies revealed promising results, but the number of patients included did not provide sufficient statistical power to allow a valid comparison of DARCA with SA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical tolerance, and hemodynamic effect of DARCA in comparison to the well-established SA.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard Coronary Angiography

Using standard coronary angiography (SA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

PROCEDUREDual-axis Rotational Coronary Angiography

Using dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Sponsors

General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years old * A clinical indication for diagnostic coronary angiography to evaluate possible CAD

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Known allergy to iodinated contrast * Renal insufficiency (\>1.5mg/dL) * Cardiogenic shock * Acute myocardial infarction within one week * Prior coronary artery bypass graft treatment * Prior percutaneous coronary intervention treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical safety of the patient during coronary angiography(CA)At time of CAThe patients were closely observed and questioned regarding discomfort and adverse events during or immediately after CA. The sensation of warmth or pain, including chest pain, is considered as discomfort. Adverse events include arrhythmias, hemodynamic compromise, chest pain described as angina-like pain and any untoward event which jeopardises the patient's life or prolongs the planned hospital stay. If patients experienced bradycardia, only bradycardia with a decrease in heart rate of 20% from the baseline was counted. Hemodynamic compromise was defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure by \> 20 mmHg to \< 90 mmHg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient safety determined by contrast and radiation doseAt time of CAThe contrast usage (ml) and radiation exposure (mGycm2) are recorded from the point of selective catheter engagement in the coronary ostium to the completion of the diagnostic study. The contrast and radiation to perform isocentering are included during DARCA. The contrast and radiation required to engage the coronary ostia, exchange catheters, and perform non-coronary angiography are excluded from the analysis.
Clinical utility of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography(DARCA)At time of CAThe clinical utility of DARCA is determined by the number of additional acquisitions required beyond the protocol and the procedure time required for completing CA.The procedure time (sec.) is recorded from the point of selective catheter engagement in the coronary ostium to the completion of the diagnostic study. The time to perform isocentering is included during DARCA. The time required to engage the coronary ostia, exchange catheters, and perform non-coronary angiography is excluded from the analysis.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026