Skip to content

The Alberta Diet: Effectiveness Study

The Alberta Diet: a Proposal for Its Implementation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01625507
Enrollment
73
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

The study hypothesis is that individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who adhere to the PANDA intervention, will have improved compliance with the nutritional therapy recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association. Specific objectives of this proposal: The objectives of the investigators PANDA (Physical Activity and Nutrition for Diabetes in Alberta) are to (a) to devise and evaluate the efficacy of a multi-level, practical, nutrition intervention program that promotes the individual factors required for effective self-management practices AND that explicitly incorporate strategies to improve food availability, accessibility and acceptability and (b) to use these interventions as a means to examine the relationships between food availability, accessibility, acceptability, adherence to Nutrition Therapy Guidelines, and metabolic indicators of diabetes control in people with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions

Participants will follow a menu plan and receive training in how to manage their diet in type 2 diabetes, following the recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association, 2008

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes, and speak/write English. * Have attended a diabetes education session delivered by their healthcare provider.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with type 1 diabetes, and those who are unable to speak English. * People with end-stage renal disease or gastrointestinal diseases that require specialized diets will also be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total Energy Intake4 monthsMeasured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Change in Macronutrient Intake3 monthsMeasured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Change in Nutrient Intake3 monthsMeasured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Composition3 monthsbody fat and fat-free mass
Change in Blood Biomarkers4 monthsblood lipids: triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol
Change in Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire Score4 monthsQuestionnaire assessing self-reported adherence to 9 criteria, whose individual scores (range 0-7) are summed to get the total score. Maximum total score is 63. Minimum total score is 0. A higher score means higher dietary adherence.
Change in Hemoglobin A1c4 monthsa surrogate of blood glucose control
Food Accessibility4 monthsquestionnaire of items related to financial and physical accessibility of foods in the diet recommended for diabetes
Food Availability4 monthsquestionnaire of items related to the availability in local stores of the food items recommended in the diet for diabetes.
Change in Waist Circumference4 monthsMeasured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention
Food Acceptability4 monthsquestionnaire based on items related to personal and cultural acceptability of the recommended diet
Program Retention3 monthsattendance at meetings
Change in Body Mass Index4 monthsActual weight and height used to calculate BMI pre- and post-intervention

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PANDA Intervention
12 week nutritional intervention, including 6 classroom/community sessions, plus two sample collection visits. PANDA intervention: Participants will follow a menu plan and receive training in how to manage their diet in type 2 diabetes, following the recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association, 2008
73
Total73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPANDA Intervention
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Education
College or university degree
40 participants
Education
High school completed
28 participants
Education
Less than high school
5 participants
Employment
Other
7 participants
Employment
Retired
18 participants
Employment
Self-employment
5 participants
Employment
Unemployed
2 participants
Employment
Wages and salaries
41 participants
Gender
Female
34 Participants
Gender
Male
39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
73 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Macronutrient Intake

Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Macronutrient IntakeTotal fat-1 percentage of total energy
All ParticipantsChange in Macronutrient IntakeSaturated fat0 percentage of total energy
All ParticipantsChange in Macronutrient IntakeProtein0 percentage of total energy
All ParticipantsChange in Macronutrient IntakeCarbohydrate2 percentage of total energy
All ParticipantsChange in Macronutrient IntakeAdded sugar0 percentage of total energy
Primary

Change in Nutrient Intake

Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeTotal fat-10 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeSaturated fat-3 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeMonounsaturated fat-3 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakePolyunsaturated fat0 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeProtein-6 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeCarbohydrate-12 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeFiber0 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeTotal sugar-5 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeAdded sugar-9 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeCholesterol-.003 grams
All ParticipantsChange in Nutrient IntakeSodium-.572 grams
Primary

Change in Total Energy Intake

Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)

Time frame: 4 months

Population: All participants, intention to treat protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Total Energy Intake-178 kcal
Secondary

Body Composition

body fat and fat-free mass

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsBody CompositionChange in Fat mass %-0.8 percentage change from baseline
All ParticipantsBody CompositionChange in Fat free mass %0.8 percentage change from baseline
Secondary

Change in Blood Biomarkers

blood lipids: triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Blood BiomarkersTotal cholesterol-63.5 mg/dL
All ParticipantsChange in Blood BiomarkersHigh density lipoprotein cholesterol27.5 mg/dL
All ParticipantsChange in Blood BiomarkersLow density lipoprotein cholesterol-88.9 mg/dL
All ParticipantsChange in Blood BiomarkersTriglycerides-10.4 mg/dL
Secondary

Change in Body Mass Index

Actual weight and height used to calculate BMI pre- and post-intervention

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Body Mass Index-0.6 kg/m2
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin A1c

a surrogate of blood glucose control

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin A1c-0.7 percentage of hemoglobin A1c
Secondary

Change in Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire Score

Questionnaire assessing self-reported adherence to 9 criteria, whose individual scores (range 0-7) are summed to get the total score. Maximum total score is 63. Minimum total score is 0. A higher score means higher dietary adherence.

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire Score9.3 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsChange in Waist Circumference-2.4 cm
Secondary

Food Acceptability

questionnaire based on items related to personal and cultural acceptability of the recommended diet

Time frame: 4 months

Secondary

Food Accessibility

questionnaire of items related to financial and physical accessibility of foods in the diet recommended for diabetes

Time frame: 4 months

Secondary

Food Availability

questionnaire of items related to the availability in local stores of the food items recommended in the diet for diabetes.

Time frame: 4 months

Secondary

Program Retention

attendance at meetings

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsProgram Retention63 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026