Skip to content

Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod 0.5 mg Orally Once Daily Versus Placebo in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy Patients.

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod 0.5 mg Administered Orally Once Daily Versus Placebo in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01625182
Enrollment
106
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2012-12-22
Completion date
2016-09-03
Last updated
2017-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Keywords

chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, CIDP, FTY720, fingolimod.

Brief summary

The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy compared with placebo.

Detailed description

This study was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in patients with a diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and treated with IVIg, corticosteroids, or both therapies prior to study entry. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive oral fingolimod (0.5 mg/day) or matching placebo. The study consisted of 3 periods: a Screening Period, a Double-blind Treatment Period and a Follow-up Period after discontinuation of study drug treatment. Patients who complete the study will have an option to enter an extension.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo Comparator

Matching placebo capsules

DRUGFingolimod

Fingolimod 0.5 mg capsules

Sponsors

Tanabe Pharma Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed * The diagnosis of CIDP will use the definition of the EFNS/PNS Task Force First Revision. Patients must either have a clinical diagnosis of CIDP fulfilling the clinical inclusion criteria for typical CIDP or one of the following atypical forms of CIDP: pure motor, or asymmetrical (MADSAM \[Lewis-Sumner syndrome\]), or IgA or IgG (not IgM) MGUS paraprotein associated. * All patients must also fulfill the clinical

Exclusion criteria

and the definite electrodiagnostic criteria of the EFNS/PNS Task Force First Revision. * disability defined by an INCAT Disability Scale score of 1-9 or, if INCAT score is 0, a documented history of disability sufficient to require treatment within the past 2 years following reduction or interruption of CIDP treatment * receiving IVIg treatment (minimal dose equivalent to 0.4 g/kg every 4 weeks for a minimum of 12 weeks) or corticosteroids (minimal dose equivalent to prednisone 10 mg/day) treatment prior to the screening visit * history of documented clinically meaningful deterioration confirmed by clinical examination during therapy or upon interruption or reduction of therapy within 18 months prior to Screening * stable CIDP symptoms for the 6 weeks before randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Confirmed Worsening on the Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability ScaleMonth 12Confirmed worsening in CIDP was measured by the adjusted INCAT Disability Scale. The adjusted INCAT disability scale measures arm disability and leg disability. For arm disability the scale ranges from 0 (no upper limb problems) to 5 (inability to use either arm for any purposeful movement). The leg disability scale ranges from 0 (walking not affected) to 5 (restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). The total adjusted INCAT disability score is calculated by the sum of the arm and leg disability scores where the total score ranges from 0 to 10. A confirmed worsening was defined as an increase by 1 or more points on the adjusted INCAT disability scale from the value at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant Handbaseline, Month 6, Month 12Grip strength measurements were done using a vigorimeter. With this device, the pressure in the bulb exercised by the participant was registered on a manometer via a rubber junction tube. Both the dominant and non-dominant hands were tested. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.
Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant Handbaseline, Month 6, Month 12Grip strength measurements were done using a vigorimeter. With this device, the pressure in the bulb exercised by the participant was registered on a manometer via a rubber junction tube. Both the dominant and non-dominant hands were tested. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.
Change From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)baseline, Month 6, Month 12This questionnaire was constructed using the patients' perception of their ability to perform daily and social activities. The questionnaire comprises 24 items ranging from ability to read a book or newspaper (as the easiest item to accomplish) to ability to run (most difficult item to accomplish). The obtained raw summed score was translated subsequently to a convenient centile metric score ranging from 0 (most severe disability) to 100 (no disability at all). A higher score indicated a better health status. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned randomly to each treatment group in a 1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fingolimod (FTY720)
Participants received Fingolimod 0.5 mg orally once daily.
54
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to Fingolimod orally once daily.
52
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems10
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy128
Overall StudyProtocol deviation02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFingolimod (FTY720)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous54.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.32
54.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68
54.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.48
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants22 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants30 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 5442 / 5282 / 106
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 544 / 5213 / 106

Outcome results

Primary

Time to First Confirmed Worsening on the Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Scale

Confirmed worsening in CIDP was measured by the adjusted INCAT Disability Scale. The adjusted INCAT disability scale measures arm disability and leg disability. For arm disability the scale ranges from 0 (no upper limb problems) to 5 (inability to use either arm for any purposeful movement). The leg disability scale ranges from 0 (walking not affected) to 5 (restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). The total adjusted INCAT disability score is calculated by the sum of the arm and leg disability scores where the total score ranges from 0 to 10. A confirmed worsening was defined as an increase by 1 or more points on the adjusted INCAT disability scale from the value at baseline.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The full analysis set, which included all participants who were assigned randomly to receive treatment, was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fingolimod (FTY720)Time to First Confirmed Worsening on the Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Scale721.0 Days
PlaceboTime to First Confirmed Worsening on the Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Scale540.0 Days
p-value: 0.983895% CI: [0.6, 1.7]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant Hand

Grip strength measurements were done using a vigorimeter. With this device, the pressure in the bulb exercised by the participant was registered on a manometer via a rubber junction tube. Both the dominant and non-dominant hands were tested. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.

Time frame: baseline, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Only participants from the FAS, who had non-missing baseline values and the given post-baseline values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who were assigned randomly to receive treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant HandMonth 6-2.6 kPa
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant HandMonth 12-0.8 kPa
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant HandMonth 6-3.8 kPa
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Grip Strength, Dominant HandMonth 12-3.9 kPa
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant Hand

Grip strength measurements were done using a vigorimeter. With this device, the pressure in the bulb exercised by the participant was registered on a manometer via a rubber junction tube. Both the dominant and non-dominant hands were tested. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.

Time frame: baseline, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Only participants from the FAS, who had non-missing baseline values and the given post-baseline values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who were assigned randomly to receive treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant HandMonth 12-1.2 kPa
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant HandMonth 6-2.7 kPa
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant HandMonth 12-5.0 kPa
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Grip Strength, Non-dominant HandMonth 6-6.1 kPa
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)

This questionnaire was constructed using the patients' perception of their ability to perform daily and social activities. The questionnaire comprises 24 items ranging from ability to read a book or newspaper (as the easiest item to accomplish) to ability to run (most difficult item to accomplish). The obtained raw summed score was translated subsequently to a convenient centile metric score ranging from 0 (most severe disability) to 100 (no disability at all). A higher score indicated a better health status. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.

Time frame: baseline, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Only participants from the FAS, who had non-missing baseline values and the given post-baseline values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who were assigned randomly to receive treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)Month 6-6.4 score on a scale
Fingolimod (FTY720)Change From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)Month 12-5.7 score on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)Month 6-5.5 score on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline for Rasch-Built Linearly Weighted Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)Month 12-5.1 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026