Skip to content

Impact of Employee Wellness Programme

The Impact of an Employee Wellness Programme in Clothing/Textile Manufacturing Companies: A Randomised Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01625039
Enrollment
80
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2012-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Occupational health, cognitive behavioural therapy, physiotherapy, physical activity

Brief summary

The introduction of a wellness programme for workers employed in a clothing factory will improve quality of life, pain, attendance at work and levels of physical activity.

Detailed description

Introduction: The prevalence of health risk behaviours is growing amongst South African employees. Health risk behaviours have been identified as a major contributor to reduced health related quality of life (HRQoL) and the increase prevalence of non-communicable diseases. Worksite wellness programmes promise to promote behaviour changes amongst employees and to improve their HRQoL. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of an employee wellness programme on HRQoL, health behaviour change, levels of self efficacy, pain intensity, body mass index (BMI) and absenteeism amongst clothing and textile manufacturing employees. Methods: The study was a randomised control trial consisting of 80 participants from three clothing manufacturing companies in South Africa. The experimental group was subjected to a wellness programme based on the principles of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as well as weekly supervised exercise classes over six weeks. The control group received a once-off health promotion talk and various educational pamphlets, with no further intervention. Measurements were recorded at baseline and at six weeks post-intervention. Outcome measures used included the EQ-5D, Brief Pain Inventory-SF, Stanford Exercise Behaviours Scale, Stanford Self-Efficacy Scale, Stanford Self-Rated Health Scale, BMI and absenteeism. Data Analysis: All the data were analysed with the Statistica-8 software program. Although t-tests are the most commonly used statistical method for evaluating the differences in the means between two groups (e.g. control and experimental), it assumes that the variable is normally distributed. Thus, because the ordinal data were not normally distributed, non-parametric tests were used to evaluate the differences in the medians between the two groups and to determine the level of significance. The Sign test was used in place of the paired t-test to determine the within group changes. The Mann-Whitney U test was used in place of the independent t-test to determine the difference between the two groups.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEmployee wellness programme

The experimental group was subjected to a wellness programme based on the principles of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as well as weekly supervised exercise classes over six weeks.

BEHAVIORALComparator (Once off educational session and educational materials)

Once off educational session and educational materials

Sponsors

University of Cape Town
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All factory workers who volunteered to take part in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects were excluded from the study if they reported uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension, coronary heart disease or any other illness that rendered participation in the exercise component unsafe.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EQ-5DBaseline, change in EQ-5D at 6 weeksGeneric Health Related Quality of Life measure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stanford Exercise Behaviour ScaleBaseline, change in stanford exercise behaviour at 6 weeksSelf reported participation in different forms of physical exercise
Body Mass IndexBaseline, Change in BMI at 6 weeksMeasurement of height and weight using standardized scales.
Absenteeism from workAll absenteeism during the six weeks prior, during the six weeks of intervention and six weeks post interventionScrutiny of attendance records

Countries

South Africa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026