Skip to content

CoreValve Advance-II Study: Prospective International Post-market Study

CoreValve Advance-II Study: Best Practices Investigation of Patients Implanted With the Medtronic CoreValve Bioprosthesis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01624870
Acronym
Advance-II
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2018-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Heart Disease

Keywords

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Heart Disease, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Brief summary

The CoreValve ADVANCE-II Study is a best practices investigation of patients implanted with the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study was to investigate the rate of conduction disturbances after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve device, aiming to characterize best practices. The investigators did not assign study specific interventions to the subjects in the study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fulfilling the criteria of labeling indications of the CoreValve System; * Patient is above the minimum age as required by local regulations to be participating in a clinical trial regardless of gender and race; * Provided Signed Informed Consent or Data Release Form.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a device regulating the heart rhythm by pacing (e.g. pacemaker, resynchronization device, implanted defibrillator); * Patients with a pre-existing class I or class II indication for new pacemaker implantation according to the 2007 ESC guidelines; * Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (except paroxysmal AF); * Participation in another drug or device study that would jeopardize the appropriate analysis of endpoints of this study. * High probability of non-adherence to the follow-up requirements (due to social, psychological or medical reasons) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New-onset Class I or II Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation30 days post procedureThe Kaplan-Meier estimate of new-onset class I or II indication for permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days for implant depth ≤6mm or \>6mm. Where class I is defined as evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment or procedure is beneficial, useful, and effective and class II is defined as conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a given treatment or procedure according to the 2007 ESC guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined Safety Endpoint30 days post procedureThe Kaplan-Meier estimate of all-cause mortality, major stroke, life threatening (or disabling) bleeding, acute Kidney Injury - Stage 3 (including renal denervation therapy), peri-procedural myocardial infarction or repeat procedure for valve related dysfunction (surgical or interventional). A Kaplan Meier assessment was used to determine the composite rate.

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Enrolled
All subjects enrolled in the study
200
Total200

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCoreValve not implanted6
Overall StudyDeath19
Overall StudyLost to follow up1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Enrolled
Age, Continuous80.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
70 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
51 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
40 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
95 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
17 / 194
other
Total, other adverse events
151 / 194
serious
Total, serious adverse events
113 / 194

Outcome results

Primary

New-onset Class I or II Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of new-onset class I or II indication for permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days for implant depth ≤6mm or \>6mm. Where class I is defined as evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment or procedure is beneficial, useful, and effective and class II is defined as conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a given treatment or procedure according to the 2007 ESC guidelines.

Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Population: the populations used for this parameter are sub-population of the 194 implanted subjects for whom data of implant depth was available

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Implant Depth ≤6mmNew-onset Class I or II Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation13.3 Percentage of subjects
CoreValve Implant Depth >6mmNew-onset Class I or II Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation21.4 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Combined Safety Endpoint

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of all-cause mortality, major stroke, life threatening (or disabling) bleeding, acute Kidney Injury - Stage 3 (including renal denervation therapy), peri-procedural myocardial infarction or repeat procedure for valve related dysfunction (surgical or interventional). A Kaplan Meier assessment was used to determine the composite rate.

Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Population: All implanted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Implant Depth ≤6mmCombined Safety Endpoint6.7 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026