Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg twice daily (bid) of fluticasone propionate, delivered by the Optinose device, with matching placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion.
Detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 3 doses of fluticasone propionate (100, 200, and 400 μg bid), delivered by the Optinose device, in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion. This study consisted of 3 phases. After signing informed consent, subjects who met eligibility criteria at Visit 1 (screening) visit entered the study. 1. Pretreatment phase (single-blind, placebo, run-in): 7 to 14 days duration, to determine disease status eligibility and to ensure the subject was able to comply with study procedures prior to randomization and enrolment in the double-blind treatment phase 2. Double-blind treatment phase: 16 weeks duration with 6 scheduled visits starting with Visit 2 (Day 1) when eligible subjects were randomized by balance allocation to 1 of 4 treatment groups and ending at Visit 7 (Week 16) 3. Open-label extension phase: 8 weeks duration with 1 scheduled visit (Visit 8 \[Week 24\]), during which all subjects received fluticasone propionate 400 mcg BID delivered by the Optinose device
Interventions
Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men or women aged 18 years and older * Women must * be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg, prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel\], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or * be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation at least 1 year before screening) or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, or * be postmenopausal (spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 1 year). * Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) or urine pregnancy test (depending on local regulations) at the screening visit * Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 1 to 3 in each of the nasal cavities as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at both screening and baseline visits * Must have at least moderate symptoms of nasal congestion/obstruction as reported by the subject for the 7 day period preceding the screening visit * At the baseline visit (Day 1), must have a morning score of at least 2 (moderate) on nasal congestion/obstruction recorded on the subject diary for at least 5 of the last 7 days of the 7 to up to 14 day run-in period * Must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization * Subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before the screening visit. Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before screening with plans to continue use throughout the study. * Must be able to cease treatment with intranasal medications including, but not limited to, intranasal steroids, intranasal sodium cromolyn, nasal atropine, nasal ipratropium bromide, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for comorbid asthma and COPD) at the screening visit * Must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at the screening visit * Must be able to use the OptiNose device correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use of the placebo device at screening, Visit 1. * Must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Women who are pregnant or lactating * Have complete or near-complete obstruction of the nasal cavities * Inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow for any reason including nasal septum deviation * Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason including nasal septum deviation * Nasal septum perforation * Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before the screening visit * Have evidence of significant baseline mucosal injury, ulceration or erosion (eg, exposed cartilage, perforation) on baseline nasal examination/nasal endoscopy * History of more than 5 sinonasal surgeries for either nasal polyps or nasal/sinus inflammation (lifetime) * History of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before the screening visit * History of any surgical procedure that prevents the ability to accurately grade polyps * Have symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis at screening or baseline and/or, based on time of year, would anticipate onset of symptoms within 4 weeks of randomization * Current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis) * Have significant oral structural abnormalities, eg, a cleft palate * Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis * History of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes * Purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks before the screening visit. Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution Note: Subjects who are taking prophylactic antibiotics will be allowed to enter the study as long as they intend to continue the antibiotics for the duration of the study. * Planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study * Allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids or steroids * Allergy or hypersensitivity to any excipients in study drug * Exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (eg, oral, parenteral, intra-articular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before the screening visit; except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD * Have nasal candidiasis * Have taken a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor within 14 days before the screening visit. * History or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (ie, \>21 mmHg) * History of intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy * History or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a cataract * Any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study * A recent (within 1 year of the screening visit) clinically significant history of drug or alcohol use, abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study * Positive urine drug screen at screening visit for drugs of abuse, with the exception of prescribed medications for legitimate medical conditions * Have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of the screening visit * Employees of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, as well as family members of the employees or the investigator
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms | Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase | Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living During the single-blind run-in phase and during the 16-week, double-blind treatment phase, an electronic diary was provided to each subject. Subjects reported both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptoms severity over the previous 12 hours) scores for nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms. |
| Change in Total Polyp Grade | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) measured by nasoendoscopy |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | Change from baseline in facial pain/pressure symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores |
| Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | Change from baseline in hyposmia symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores |
| Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score | Baseline, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities measured by nasoendoscopy) |
| Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | Subjects with a Polyp Grade of 0 (None) in at least one nostril Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate |
| Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be |
| MOS Sleep-R Score | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity. |
| Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | Measured by the 7-day average instantaneous morning diary symptom scores |
| SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. |
| SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. |
| Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | Patient Global Impression of Change; subject responses to the question: Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms? Percentage includes patients who scored either very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved. |
| Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | A subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met: * Subject has had moderate symptoms of congestion from nasal polyposis for ≥ 3 months. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use of topical steroids at conventional doses for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use (or previous use) of saline lavage for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject has endoscopically visualized bilateral nasal polyposis of at least moderate severity (nasal polyp grading score ≥ 2 in at least 1 nostril). |
| Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase | The PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point. Change from baseline in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) |
| Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | The RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function. |
| Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase | Change from baseline in rhinorrhea symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Matched placebo BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks | 80 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg OPN-375 100 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks | 81 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg OPN-375 200 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks | 80 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks | 82 |
| Total | 323 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16) | Adverse Event | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16) | Lack of Efficacy | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16) | Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16) | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24) | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | OPN-375 100 mcg | Placebo | OPN-375 200 mcg | OPN-375 400 mcg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 45.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.66 | 46.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.72 | 46.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.95 | 44.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.87 | 45.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14 |
| Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day instantaneous morning) | 1.44 units on a scale | 1.46 units on a scale | 1.46 units on a scale | 1.48 units on a scale | 1.35 units on a scale |
| Hyposmia Score (7-day instantaneous morning) | 2.43 units on a scale | 2.36 units on a scale | 2.47 units on a scale | 2.54 units on a scale | 2.33 units on a scale |
| Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale Revised (MOS Sleep-R) | 41.2 units on a scale | 40.9 units on a scale | 41.7 units on a scale | 43.0 units on a scale | 39.1 units on a scale |
| Nasal Congestion/obstruction Score (7-day instantaneous morning) | 2.24 units on a scale | 2.23 units on a scale | 2.29 units on a scale | 2.20 units on a scale | 2.25 units on a scale |
| Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility | 172 Participants | 40 Participants | 45 Participants | 42 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | 118.4 L/min | 123.4 L/min | 119.7 L/min | 107.6 L/min | 122.7 L/min |
| Previous polyp removal surgery via polypectomy only | 115 Participants | 33 Participants | 30 Participants | 25 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Previous sinus surgery for polyp removal or sinus surgery | 111 Participants | 28 Participants | 24 Participants | 33 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 13 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 304 Participants | 76 Participants | 76 Participants | 76 Participants | 76 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 131 participants | 34 participants | 31 participants | 33 participants | 33 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 55 participants | 13 participants | 15 participants | 13 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 44 participants | 10 participants | 12 participants | 11 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 54 participants | 14 participants | 12 participants | 13 participants | 15 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 39 participants | 10 participants | 10 participants | 10 participants | 9 participants |
| Rhinorrhea Score (7-day instantaneous morning) | 1.83 units on a scale | 1.89 units on a scale | 1.8 units on a scale | 1.86 units on a scale | 1.77 units on a scale |
| Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | 42.5 units on a scale | 43.9 units on a scale | 44.9 units on a scale | 39.7 units on a scale | 41.5 units on a scale |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 137 Participants | 39 Participants | 38 Participants | 34 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 186 Participants | 42 Participants | 42 Participants | 46 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Short Form (36) Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Component | 45.1 units on a scale | 44.4 units on a scale | 43.1 units on a scale | 45.9 units on a scale | 47.0 units on a scale |
| Short Form (36) Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component | 46.2 units on a scale | 46.1 units on a scale | 45.8 units on a scale | 46.5 units on a scale | 46.4 units on a scale |
| Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | 48.9 units on a scale | 48.5 units on a scale | 52.0 units on a scale | 48.1 units on a scale | 47.1 units on a scale |
| Total Polyp Grading Score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) | 3.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02 | 3.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98 | 3.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08 | 3.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05 | 3.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98 |
| Use of ICS treatment for polyps in past 10 years | 280 Participants | 67 Participants | 73 Participants | 70 Participants | 70 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 38 / 79 | 39 / 80 | 39 / 80 | 46 / 82 | 60 / 299 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 79 | 0 / 80 | 0 / 80 | 1 / 82 | 0 / 299 |
Outcome results
Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living During the single-blind run-in phase and during the 16-week, double-blind treatment phase, an electronic diary was provided to each subject. Subjects reported both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptoms severity over the previous 12 hours) scores for nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase
Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms | -0.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms | -0.59 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms | -0.68 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms | -0.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
Change in Total Polyp Grade
Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) measured by nasoendoscopy
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in Total Polyp Grade | -0.61 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Change in Total Polyp Grade | -1.31 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Change in Total Polyp Grade | -1.22 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Change in Total Polyp Grade | -1.41 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Change from baseline in rhinorrhea symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Population: Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation method in the primary analyses for the co-primary efficacy variables. For other efficacy analyses, missing or invalid values were not imputed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.42 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -1.00 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.84 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.84 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities measured by nasoendoscopy)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score | -1.06 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score | -1.60 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score | -1.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score | -1.75 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Change from baseline in facial pain/pressure symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.85 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.81 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.75 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Change from baseline in hyposmia symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.54 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.47 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.63 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
MOS Sleep-R Score
The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | MOS Sleep-R Score | -10.03 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.52 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | MOS Sleep-R Score | -14.26 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.46 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | MOS Sleep-R Score | -15.78 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.5 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | MOS Sleep-R Score | -14.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.44 |
Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Measured by the 7-day average instantaneous morning diary symptom scores
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.99 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.93 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning) | -0.97 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery
A subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met: * Subject has had moderate symptoms of congestion from nasal polyposis for ≥ 3 months. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use of topical steroids at conventional doses for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use (or previous use) of saline lavage for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject has endoscopically visualized bilateral nasal polyposis of at least moderate severity (nasal polyp grading score ≥ 2 in at least 1 nostril).
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 16 | 23 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 13 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 9 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 16 | 13 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 16 | 13 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 12 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 16 | 17 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC
Patient Global Impression of Change; subject responses to the question: Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms? Percentage includes patients who scored either very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved.
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much improved | 17 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally improved | 22 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much worse | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally worse | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much improved | 16 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally improved | 19 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much worse | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | No change | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much improved | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally worse | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much worse | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much improved | 26 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | No change | 18 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much improved | 19 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much improved | 21 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much improved | 37 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally improved | 13 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally improved | 15 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | No change | 7 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much improved | 34 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | No change | 3 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much improved | 34 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much improved | 17 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally improved | 16 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | No change | 7 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much improved | 23 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much improved | 24 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally improved | 15 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | No change | 4 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally worse | 3 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Very much improved | 24 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | No change | 6 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally worse | 0 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | No change | 7 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Minimally improved | 19 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much worse | 1 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Much improved | 40 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 16 | Much improved | 31 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Minimally improved | 6 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | Very much improved | 25 Participants |
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)
The PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point. Change from baseline in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 16 | 0.54 L/min | Standard Error 5.37 |
| Placebo | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 15.34 L/min | Standard Error 5.42 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 32.06 L/min | Standard Error 5.2 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 16 | 26.50 L/min | Standard Error 5.12 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 16 | 24.92 L/min | Standard Error 5.25 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 31.87 L/min | Standard Error 5.36 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 16 | 28.64 L/min | Standard Error 5.04 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 33.08 L/min | Standard Error 5.13 |
Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril
Subjects with a Polyp Grade of 0 (None) in at least one nostril Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 16 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24) | 6 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 16 | 10 Participants |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24) | 19 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24) | 17 Participants |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 16 | 6 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 16 | 11 Participants |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24) | 22 Participants |
Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score
The RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | -7.80 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.97 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | -15.54 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.86 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | -15.37 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.89 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score | -16.69 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
SF-36v2 - Mental Component
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 16 | 1.69 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.86 |
| Placebo | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 4.90 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.93 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 4.07 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.89 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 16 | 4.37 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.81 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 16 | 3.88 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.83 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 4.41 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.92 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 16 | 3.98 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | SF-36v2 - Mental Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 5.86 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.87 |
SF-36v2 - Physical Component
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 16 | 2.78 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Placebo | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 5.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.67 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 5.23 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.64 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 16 | 4.27 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.66 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 5.85 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.67 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 16 | 4.57 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.67 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 16 | 5.07 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.64 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | SF-36v2 - Physical Component | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | 6.06 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.63 |
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 16 | -11.70 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.81 |
| Placebo | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | -19.45 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.85 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | -22.89 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.75 |
| OPN-375 100 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 16 | -21.14 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.71 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 16 | -21.43 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.75 |
| OPN-375 200 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | -22.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 16 | -21.05 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.68 |
| OPN-375 400 mcg | Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score | Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24) | -23.21 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.72 |