Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Using a Novel Bi-directional Device

A 16-Week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Twice a Day (Bid) Using a Novel Bi-directional Device in Subjects With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis Followed by an 8-week, Open-label Extension Phase to Assess Safety

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01624662
Enrollment
323
Registered
2012-06-21
Start date
2013-10-30
Completion date
2015-07-03
Last updated
2018-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bilateral Nasal Polyposis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg twice daily (bid) of fluticasone propionate, delivered by the Optinose device, with matching placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion.

Detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 3 doses of fluticasone propionate (100, 200, and 400 μg bid), delivered by the Optinose device, in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion. This study consisted of 3 phases. After signing informed consent, subjects who met eligibility criteria at Visit 1 (screening) visit entered the study. 1. Pretreatment phase (single-blind, placebo, run-in): 7 to 14 days duration, to determine disease status eligibility and to ensure the subject was able to comply with study procedures prior to randomization and enrolment in the double-blind treatment phase 2. Double-blind treatment phase: 16 weeks duration with 6 scheduled visits starting with Visit 2 (Day 1) when eligible subjects were randomized by balance allocation to 1 of 4 treatment groups and ending at Visit 7 (Week 16) 3. Open-label extension phase: 8 weeks duration with 1 scheduled visit (Visit 8 \[Week 24\]), during which all subjects received fluticasone propionate 400 mcg BID delivered by the Optinose device

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone propionate

Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System

Sponsors

Optinose US Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women aged 18 years and older * Women must * be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg, prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel\], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or * be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation at least 1 year before screening) or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, or * be postmenopausal (spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 1 year). * Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) or urine pregnancy test (depending on local regulations) at the screening visit * Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 1 to 3 in each of the nasal cavities as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at both screening and baseline visits * Must have at least moderate symptoms of nasal congestion/obstruction as reported by the subject for the 7 day period preceding the screening visit * At the baseline visit (Day 1), must have a morning score of at least 2 (moderate) on nasal congestion/obstruction recorded on the subject diary for at least 5 of the last 7 days of the 7 to up to 14 day run-in period * Must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization * Subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before the screening visit. Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before screening with plans to continue use throughout the study. * Must be able to cease treatment with intranasal medications including, but not limited to, intranasal steroids, intranasal sodium cromolyn, nasal atropine, nasal ipratropium bromide, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for comorbid asthma and COPD) at the screening visit * Must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at the screening visit * Must be able to use the OptiNose device correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use of the placebo device at screening, Visit 1. * Must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or lactating * Have complete or near-complete obstruction of the nasal cavities * Inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow for any reason including nasal septum deviation * Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason including nasal septum deviation * Nasal septum perforation * Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before the screening visit * Have evidence of significant baseline mucosal injury, ulceration or erosion (eg, exposed cartilage, perforation) on baseline nasal examination/nasal endoscopy * History of more than 5 sinonasal surgeries for either nasal polyps or nasal/sinus inflammation (lifetime) * History of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before the screening visit * History of any surgical procedure that prevents the ability to accurately grade polyps * Have symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis at screening or baseline and/or, based on time of year, would anticipate onset of symptoms within 4 weeks of randomization * Current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis) * Have significant oral structural abnormalities, eg, a cleft palate * Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis * History of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes * Purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks before the screening visit. Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution Note: Subjects who are taking prophylactic antibiotics will be allowed to enter the study as long as they intend to continue the antibiotics for the duration of the study. * Planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study * Allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids or steroids * Allergy or hypersensitivity to any excipients in study drug * Exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (eg, oral, parenteral, intra-articular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before the screening visit; except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD * Have nasal candidiasis * Have taken a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor within 14 days before the screening visit. * History or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (ie, \>21 mmHg) * History of intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy * History or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a cataract * Any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study * A recent (within 1 year of the screening visit) clinically significant history of drug or alcohol use, abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study * Positive urine drug screen at screening visit for drugs of abuse, with the exception of prescribed medications for legitimate medical conditions * Have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of the screening visit * Employees of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, as well as family members of the employees or the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction SymptomsBaseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phaseSubjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living During the single-blind run-in phase and during the 16-week, double-blind treatment phase, an electronic diary was provided to each subject. Subjects reported both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptoms severity over the previous 12 hours) scores for nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
Change in Total Polyp GradeBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseDetermined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) measured by nasoendoscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseChange from baseline in facial pain/pressure symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseChange from baseline in hyposmia symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Change in Total Nasal Polyp ScoreBaseline, Week 24 of the open-label extension phasePolyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities measured by nasoendoscopy)
Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseSubjects with a Polyp Grade of 0 (None) in at least one nostril Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseSNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be
MOS Sleep-R ScoreBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseThe MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity.
Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseMeasured by the 7-day average instantaneous morning diary symptom scores
SF-36v2 - Mental ComponentBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseThe SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
SF-36v2 - Physical ComponentBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseThe SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Number of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phasePatient Global Impression of Change; subject responses to the question: Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms? Percentage includes patients who scored either very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved.
Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseA subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met: * Subject has had moderate symptoms of congestion from nasal polyposis for ≥ 3 months. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use of topical steroids at conventional doses for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use (or previous use) of saline lavage for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject has endoscopically visualized bilateral nasal polyposis of at least moderate severity (nasal polyp grading score ≥ 2 in at least 1 nostril).
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phaseThe PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point. Change from baseline in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)
Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseThe RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function.
Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phaseChange from baseline in rhinorrhea symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matched placebo BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks
80
OPN-375 100 mcg
OPN-375 100 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks
81
OPN-375 200 mcg
OPN-375 200 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks
80
OPN-375 400 mcg
OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 16 weeks, then OPN-375 400 mcg BID x 8 weeks
82
Total323

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16)Adverse Event2110
Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16)Lack of Efficacy5100
Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16)Protocol Violation0100
Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Wks 1-16)Withdrawal by Subject3030
Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24)Adverse Event1101
Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24)Lack of Efficacy0010
Open-Label Extension Phase (Wks 17-24)Withdrawal by Subject0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOPN-375 100 mcgPlaceboOPN-375 200 mcgOPN-375 400 mcg
Age, Continuous45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.66
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.72
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.95
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.87
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14
Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day instantaneous morning)1.44 units on a scale1.46 units on a scale1.46 units on a scale1.48 units on a scale1.35 units on a scale
Hyposmia Score (7-day instantaneous morning)2.43 units on a scale2.36 units on a scale2.47 units on a scale2.54 units on a scale2.33 units on a scale
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale Revised (MOS Sleep-R)41.2 units on a scale40.9 units on a scale41.7 units on a scale43.0 units on a scale39.1 units on a scale
Nasal Congestion/obstruction Score (7-day instantaneous morning)2.24 units on a scale2.23 units on a scale2.29 units on a scale2.20 units on a scale2.25 units on a scale
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility172 Participants40 Participants45 Participants42 Participants45 Participants
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)118.4 L/min123.4 L/min119.7 L/min107.6 L/min122.7 L/min
Previous polyp removal surgery via polypectomy only115 Participants33 Participants30 Participants25 Participants27 Participants
Previous sinus surgery for polyp removal or sinus surgery111 Participants28 Participants24 Participants33 Participants26 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
304 Participants76 Participants76 Participants76 Participants76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
131 participants34 participants31 participants33 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
55 participants13 participants15 participants13 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
44 participants10 participants12 participants11 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
54 participants14 participants12 participants13 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants10 participants10 participants10 participants9 participants
Rhinorrhea Score (7-day instantaneous morning)1.83 units on a scale1.89 units on a scale1.8 units on a scale1.86 units on a scale1.77 units on a scale
Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score42.5 units on a scale43.9 units on a scale44.9 units on a scale39.7 units on a scale41.5 units on a scale
Sex: Female, Male
Female
137 Participants39 Participants38 Participants34 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
186 Participants42 Participants42 Participants46 Participants56 Participants
Short Form (36) Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Mental Component45.1 units on a scale44.4 units on a scale43.1 units on a scale45.9 units on a scale47.0 units on a scale
Short Form (36) Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) - Physical Component46.2 units on a scale46.1 units on a scale45.8 units on a scale46.5 units on a scale46.4 units on a scale
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score48.9 units on a scale48.5 units on a scale52.0 units on a scale48.1 units on a scale47.1 units on a scale
Total Polyp Grading Score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities)3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
Use of ICS treatment for polyps in past 10 years280 Participants67 Participants73 Participants70 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 7939 / 8039 / 8046 / 8260 / 299
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 790 / 800 / 801 / 820 / 299

Outcome results

Primary

Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms

Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living During the single-blind run-in phase and during the 16-week, double-blind treatment phase, an electronic diary was provided to each subject. Subjects reported both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptoms severity over the previous 12 hours) scores for nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
OPN-375 100 mcgChange in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms-0.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
OPN-375 200 mcgChange in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms-0.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
OPN-375 400 mcgChange in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms-0.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Primary

Change in Total Polyp Grade

Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) measured by nasoendoscopy

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Total Polyp Grade-0.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
OPN-375 100 mcgChange in Total Polyp Grade-1.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
OPN-375 200 mcgChange in Total Polyp Grade-1.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
OPN-375 400 mcgChange in Total Polyp Grade-1.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

Change from baseline in rhinorrhea symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

Population: Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation method in the primary analyses for the co-primary efficacy variables. For other efficacy analyses, missing or invalid values were not imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 100 mcgChange in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-1.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 200 mcgChange in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 400 mcgChange in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change in Total Nasal Polyp Score

Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities measured by nasoendoscopy)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Total Nasal Polyp Score-1.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
OPN-375 100 mcgChange in Total Nasal Polyp Score-1.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
OPN-375 200 mcgChange in Total Nasal Polyp Score-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
OPN-375 400 mcgChange in Total Nasal Polyp Score-1.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Secondary

Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

Change from baseline in facial pain/pressure symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboFacial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 100 mcgFacial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 200 mcgFacial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 400 mcgFacial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

Change from baseline in hyposmia symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
OPN-375 100 mcgHyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 200 mcgHyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
OPN-375 400 mcgHyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

MOS Sleep-R Score

The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMOS Sleep-R Score-10.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
OPN-375 100 mcgMOS Sleep-R Score-14.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
OPN-375 200 mcgMOS Sleep-R Score-15.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
OPN-375 400 mcgMOS Sleep-R Score-14.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Secondary

Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

Measured by the 7-day average instantaneous morning diary symptom scores

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline assessments of polyp size (nasoendoscopy) and recorded morning nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 100 mcgNasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 200 mcgNasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 400 mcgNasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)-0.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Number of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp Surgery

A subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met: * Subject has had moderate symptoms of congestion from nasal polyposis for ≥ 3 months. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use of topical steroids at conventional doses for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use (or previous use) of saline lavage for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject has endoscopically visualized bilateral nasal polyposis of at least moderate severity (nasal polyp grading score ≥ 2 in at least 1 nostril).

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 1623 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)13 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)9 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 1613 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 1613 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)12 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 1617 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants Eligible for Nasal Polyp SurgeryWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants in Each Category of PGIC

Patient Global Impression of Change; subject responses to the question: Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms? Percentage includes patients who scored either very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved.

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much improved17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally improved22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally worse5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much improved16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally improved19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)No change3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much improved6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much improved26 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16No change18 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much improved19 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much improved21 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much improved37 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally improved13 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally improved15 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much worse1 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16No change7 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally worse1 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally worse1 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much worse1 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much improved34 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much worse1 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)No change3 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much improved34 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much improved17 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally improved16 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16No change7 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally worse0 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much worse1 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much improved23 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much improved24 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally improved15 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)No change4 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally worse3 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Very much improved24 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)No change6 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally worse0 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16No change7 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Minimally improved19 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much worse1 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Much improved40 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 16Much improved31 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Minimally improved6 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgNumber of Participants in Each Category of PGICWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)Very much improved25 Participants
Secondary

Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)

The PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point. Change from baseline in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 160.54 L/minStandard Error 5.37
PlaceboPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)15.34 L/minStandard Error 5.42
OPN-375 100 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)32.06 L/minStandard Error 5.2
OPN-375 100 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 1626.50 L/minStandard Error 5.12
OPN-375 200 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 1624.92 L/minStandard Error 5.25
OPN-375 200 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)31.87 L/minStandard Error 5.36
OPN-375 400 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 1628.64 L/minStandard Error 5.04
OPN-375 400 mcgPeak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)Week 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)33.08 L/minStandard Error 5.13
Secondary

Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril

Subjects with a Polyp Grade of 0 (None) in at least one nostril Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate

Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 163 Participants
PlaceboPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24)6 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 1610 Participants
OPN-375 100 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24)19 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24)17 Participants
OPN-375 200 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 166 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 1611 Participants
OPN-375 400 mcgPolyp Grade of 0 in at Least One NostrilWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 μg BID wks 17-24)22 Participants
Secondary

Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score

The RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score-7.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.97
OPN-375 100 mcgRhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score-15.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.86
OPN-375 200 mcgRhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score-15.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.89
OPN-375 400 mcgRhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score-16.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

SF-36v2 - Mental Component

The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 161.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
PlaceboSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)4.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
OPN-375 100 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)4.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
OPN-375 100 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 164.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
OPN-375 200 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 163.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
OPN-375 200 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)4.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
OPN-375 400 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 163.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
OPN-375 400 mcgSF-36v2 - Mental ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)5.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Secondary

SF-36v2 - Physical Component

The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 162.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)5.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
OPN-375 100 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)5.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
OPN-375 100 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 164.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
OPN-375 200 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)5.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
OPN-375 200 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 164.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
OPN-375 400 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 165.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
OPN-375 400 mcgSF-36v2 - Physical ComponentWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)6.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Secondary

Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score

SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase

Population: Number of patients analyzed at Week 24 is lower as some patients elected not to participate in the open-label extension phase or withdrew during the open-label extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 16-11.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.81
PlaceboSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)-19.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
OPN-375 100 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)-22.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
OPN-375 100 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 16-21.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.71
OPN-375 200 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 16-21.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
OPN-375 200 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)-22.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
OPN-375 400 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 16-21.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.68
OPN-375 400 mcgSinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total ScoreWeek 24 (all pts on OPN-375 400 mcg BID wks 17-24)-23.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026