Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Irritable bowel syndrome, Diarrhea, abdominal pain, diet, nutrition
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to find out if the diets often recommended for patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) provide adequate relief. The study will compare two diets that are used to treat IBS-D symptoms to see which one is more effective. The study will also measure the effect of these diets on the bowel flora, which are the good bacteria that inhabit the bowels in healthy people.
Detailed description
As irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms are often refractory to conventional therapies, there has been increasing interest in the role of diet in IBS. Certain foods may exacerbate symptoms of IBS. Thus, restricted diets have recently gained attention for the treatment IBS. The mechanism by which symptoms are improved is unclear, but these diets may improve symptoms by exerting changes on the GI microbiome. Aims: Primary Objective: -Compare the proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) reporting adequate relief on Diet 1 vs Diet 2 Secondary Objectives: * Assess the effects of these diets in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS on the gastrointestinal microbiota and blood based biomarkers. * Compare the efficacy of Diet 1 vs Diet 2 in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS on pre-specified clinical and quality of life endpoints. Methods: This is a prospective randomized control trial of adults meeting the Rome III criteria for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). After a 2 week screening period and randomization, during which the severity of symptoms will be assessed and eligibility determined, patients will be randomized to Diet 1 vs Diet 2 for a period of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the proportion of patients in each group reporting adequate relief of their IBS symptoms. For the secondary clinical outcomes, a responder definition incorporating abdominal pain and stool consistency as proposed by the FDA will be utilized. Key IBS-D symptoms will be assessed daily and adequate relief of IBS-D symptoms will be assessed weekly during the randomization period. We will also determine if a difference can be detected with high probability in the relative abundance and variety of specific bacterial taxa between the two groups before and after the 4 week dietary intervention. In addition, blood samples will be collected before and after randomization to measure relevant biomarkers of immune activation.
Interventions
OTHERDietary intervention
After a 14 day screening period, subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 diets to treat their IBS symptoms. They will receive dietary instruction and are expected to remain on this diet for 4 weeks.
Sponsors
University of Michigan
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Meet Rome III criteria for IBS as assessed by a gastroenterologist: * Fulfill the Rome III stool consistency criteria for IBS -D * Willingness to maintain a stable dosage of IBS medications during the pretreatment baseline period, including tricyclic antidepressants; rescue medications permitted (ie Loperamide 2mg up to 4 times per day prn diarrhea) * Ability to provide written informed consent for study participation * Capable of independently completing all requirements of the study including returning for required visits * Documentation of normal colonoscopy with colon biopsies within five years * Documentation of normal TSH, CBC, electrolyte panel * Negative evaluation for celiac disease either with normal TTG, EMA, and/or duodenal biopsy.
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to understand or provide written informed consent * Pregnancy * IBS with constipation or mixed subtype * Comorbid medical problems that may affect gastrointestinal transit or motility: * Inflammatory bowel disease * Extraintestinal disease known to affect the gastrointestinal system (ie, scleroderma, unstable thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, etc.) * Severe renal or hepatic disease * Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic/urologic surgery * Previous treatment with some diets for IBS * Concurrent medications not permitted including probiotics, antibiotics, and narcotics * Active participation in another form of dietary therapy * Patients who have undergone surgery to the GI tract except appendectomy or cholecystectomy if performed more than six months prior to enrollment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients with adequate relief. | 4 weeks | Compare the proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) reporting adequate relief on Diet 1 v Diet 2. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Pain | 4 weeks | An abdominal pain responder will report a ≥30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain score compared to baseline for ≥2 of 4 treatment weeks. The proportion of responders between the two groups will be compared. Between group differences in the proportion of patients with a ≥30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain score compared to baseline at the end of each treatment week will also be assessed. |
| Stool consistency | 4 weeks | For stool consistency, a responder will be defined as one who reports a decrease in mean daily BSFS value of 1 or more compared to baseline for ≥2 of 4 treatment weeks. The proportion of responders between the 2 groups will be compared. Between group differences in the proportion of patients with a decrease in BSFS value of ≥1 compared to baseline at the end of each treatment week will also be assessed. |
| Stool frequency | 4 weeks | The number of bowel movements will be recorded each day by IVRS. The change from baseline in mean daily stool frequency for each treatment week will be compared for the two groups. |
| Composite endpoint | 4 weeks | Composite endpoint: A responder will report a ≥30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain score and a decrease in mean daily BSFS value of ≥1 compared to baseline for ≥2 of 4 treatment weeks. The proportion of responders between the 2 groups will be compared. |
| Quality of life measures | 4 weeks | IBS-Quality of Life scores, Hospital Depression Anxiety Scores, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and Sleep Assessment questionnaires will be compared between groups before and after the dietary intervention. |
| Stool Microbiome | 4 weeks | The effect of these 2 diets on the gut microbiome (number and species) in the context of IBS is not known. A change in the microbiota may be a mechanism through which symptom response is mediated. We will be measuring the shift in the relative abundance (richness) and variety (diversity) of gut microbial taxa in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) in response to dietary intervention. Stool microbiome would be collected and analyzed using the PhyloChip™ Assay (Second Genome Inc., San Bruno, CA). |
| Serum Biomarker Panel | 4 weeks | Recent attempts have been made to identify a serological biomarker profile (Prometheus Therapeutics & Diagnostics, San Diego, CA) which accurately identifies patients with IBS. We intend to perform a biomarker test panel at enrollment in all study subjects to assess whether specific combinations of biomarkers can positively or negatively predict response to either diet. |
| Individual symptoms | 4 weeks | The change from baseline in daily NRS scores averaged over each treatment week for abdominal discomfort, urgency, bloating, and fatigue will compared between the 2 groups. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed