Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
Catheter ablation, radiofrequency, Epicardially applied radiofrequency ablation, Minimally invasive surgical approach
Brief summary
Prospective, multi-center, investigator-driven trial. This study hypothesizes that combining surgical endoscopic and transcatheter techniques in a staged fashion provides superior clinical outcomes than isolated surgical/EP approaches in patients with persistent AF lasting \> 1 year but \> 5 years. The proposed procedure involves the creation of cardiac lesions with epicardially applied radiofrequency (RF) ablation through a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach followed by a delayed EP ablation procedure performed at 1-2 months from the surgical operation.
Detailed description
New ablative technologies have been developed to simplify the original cut and sew Cox Maze procedure so that it can now be used for routine treatment of AF in patients undergoing open-heart surgery, as well as in a stand-alone arrhythmia procedure. A minimally invasive, thoracoscopic surgical treatment of AF is able to address both the triggers for AF by pulmonary vein isolation and the left posterior atrial wall exclusion, which after the pulmonary veins is the next most important atrial substrate in the promotion of AF. New hybrid procedures attempt to combine the success rate and the minimally invasive nature of thoracoscopic mini-Maze with the effectiveness and short recovery times associated with catheter ablation. The key is blocking signals that cause the arrhythmia from both outside (epicardial) and inside (endocardial) the heart. Suboptimal results of both catheter ablation and surgery suggest that success in the treatment of long standing persistent AF and persistent lone AF will benefit from a close collaboration between the cardiothoracic surgeon and the electrophysiologist, to offer patients the best available combination of treatments for any given set of cardiovascular lesions. Hybrid treatment for AF is being increasingly adopted in Europe and the United States and has been assessed for the treatment of AF at the Coordinating Center (Brescia, Italy) with promising results.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Meditrial SrL
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects will be treated initially by thorocoscopic epicardial surgical RF ablation to create a box lesion around the pulmonary veins, ganglionated plexi, and superior vena cava-inferior vena cava (SVC-IVC) connecting lesions. Four to maximum 8 weeks following the surgical ablation procedure, the patient is returning to the EP Laboratory to: Assess integrity of the Box lesion Eliminate gaps in the surgical lesions when found Terminate fragmented potentials Perform a Caval-Tricuspid Isthmus (CTI) lesion line Upon completion of this procedure, integrity of the lesions is reassessed just prior to withdrawing the EP catheters from the LA.
Exclusion criteria
* History of Recurrent Persistent or Long Standing Persistent AF for more than 5 years; Documented left atrial size (AP diameter) greater than 55 mm; Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less; History of cerebrovascular disease, including stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to enrollment; Significant underlying structural heart disease requiring surgical or procedural intervention; Previous heart surgery; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (\< 70% predictive lung function); Contraindication to anticoagulant therapy, or inability to comply with anticoagulant therapy; Other clinical conditions precluding inclusion (e.g., organ disease, disturbances of hemostasis, etc.); Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding; Concomitant cardiac surgery procedure planned.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY EFFICACY ENDPOINT: 24-hour Holter monitoring | 9 months following the end of the blanking period | The primary efficacy endpoint is the rate of therapeutic success, with a target rate of \> 60%. Therapeutic success is defined as freedom from AF, during the 9 months following the end of the blanking period, based on 24-hour Holter monitor results, and freedom from AADs beginning at 6 months following surgery. The blanking period is 3 months following the surgical ablation procedure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SECONDARY EFFICACY ENDPOINTS: 24-hour Holter monitoring | 9 months following the end of the blanking period | Rate of therapeutic success is defined as freedom from AF, 9 months following the end of the blanking period, based on 24-hour Holter monitoring. The target success rate is \>60%. Rate of therapeutic success is defined as freedom from AF, during the 9 months following the end of the blanking period.The blanking period is 3 months following the surgical ablation procedure. |
Countries
France, Germany, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom
Contacts
Primary ContactClaudio Muneretto, Prof.
Backup ContactAntonio Curnis, MD.
Outcome results
None listed