Skip to content

Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial - 10 Year Follow-up

Randomised, Controlled Trial Comparing Angiographic Patency of the Radial Artery Versus the Saphenous Vein Used as Free Aorto-coronary Grafts in Coronary Revascularisation (RSVP Trial) - 10-year Follow-up

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01622387
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-06-19
Start date
2011-10-13
Completion date
2014-07-03
Last updated
2019-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary artery bypass surgery, Arteries, Veins, Conduits

Brief summary

During coronary bypass surgery, veins are taken from the leg and applied to the heart and aorta to 'bypass' narrowings in the coronary arteries. However using an artery in the chest, the internal mammary artery, means that the bypass lasts longer than using veins. The investigators recently showed that using an artery from the arm as a bypass vessel, the radial artery, also had less furring up than veins 5 years after surgery. Now the investigators would like to ask patients to come back for an angiogram 10 years following surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDURECoronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery using a radial arterial conduit

Use of radial artery as a bypass conduit/graft to the left circumflex coronary artery region of the heart in CABG surgery

PROCEDURECoronary artery bypass surgery using a long saphenous vein conduit

Use of long saphenous vein as a graft/conduit vessel to the left circumflex coronary artery region of the heart in CABG surgery

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Included in the RSVP study * Willing to attend for coronary angiography * Willing to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to coronary angiography * participation in research project within previous 60 days * unwilling to give written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of radial artery and saphenous vein grafts patent at 10 years10 years post surgeryComparison of the patency of radial artery and long saphenous aorto-coronary bypass grafts at 10 years, assessed by an independent observer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic visual grading10 years post surgeryCompare secondary angiographic visual grading in radial artery and long saphenous vein grafts
Patency (patent or complete occlusion, and secondary visual grading) of radial artery and internal mammary artery coronary bypass grafts10 years post surgeryCompare the patency (patent or complete occlusion, and secondary visual grading) of radial artery and internal mammary artery coronary bypass grafts

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026