Skip to content

Different Retraining Methods vs Usual Care on the Prevention of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

Retraining Via Operation Inspection or Verbal Education vs Usual Care on the Prevention of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01621997
Enrollment
150
Registered
2012-06-18
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2020-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peritonitis

Keywords

peritoneal dialysis, retraining, peritonitis

Brief summary

To examine whether retraining via operation inspection or verbal education can reduce the risk for peritonitis in PD patients.

Detailed description

The design is prospective, randomized, controlled study. At baseline (during the first month), they will receive a standard training program on performing bag exchange and education on the prevention of peritonitis. Then the participants will be randomized into three groups: retraining via operation inspection (G1), retraining via verbal education (G2) and usual care (G3). Retraining will be performed every 2 months in G1 and G2 group. During the following 2 years or a longer period, all the participants will be followed up frequently with outcome events recorded.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALoperation inspection

Retraining via operation inspection means that nurses check if patients can follow the taught skill during the procedure of bag exchange and correct wrong steps in one-to-one way every 2 months. Retraining via verbal education means that nurses remind patients of key points of bag exchange through interactive quiz derived from above checklist every 2 months till 24 months

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* CAPD patients. * Medically stable and receiving PD for\<1 week * age between 18 and 80 years * self-care or doing bag exchange by a fixed assistant

Exclusion criteria

* followed up at least every 2 months * dialyzed with glucose lactate-buffered PD solutions produced by Baxter Corp, China

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
first-episode peritonitis48 monthsInfection rates were calculated as the number of infections divided by the total time at risk, and expressed as episodes per 100 patient-years at risk.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
first-episode enteric peritonitis,first-episode non-enteric peritonitis48 mothsEnteric organisms included enterococcus and enterobacter.
transition transition to haemodialysis, and all-cause death.48 mothstransition to haemodialysis, and all-cause death.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026