Skip to content

Soft Tissue Responses Around Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implant Abutments on Dental Implants: Histological, Genetic and Clinical Evaluation in Smokers and Non-smokers.

Soft Tissue Responses Around Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implant Abutments on Dental Implants: Histological, Genetic and Clinical Evaluation in Smokers and Non-smokers.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01620918
Acronym
STRANDI
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-06-15
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2021-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Minimum of 2 Dental Implants Needed, Missing Several Teeth

Brief summary

* Baseline: * Standard preparation of the osteotomy * Placement of 2 dental implants * On each implant one of both types of healing abutments is placed * Suturing * Standardized radiography to measure bone-levels at baseline * Digital impression of the surrounding gingiva with an intra-oral scanner (a non-invasive method) to measure the baseline level of the gingiva * 2 weeks after Baseline: o Removal of the sutures * 4 weeks after Baseline: * A 2nd digital impression of the soft tissue with an intra-oral scanner * Collecting crevicular fluid by placing paperpoints in the provided apertures in the healing abutments for 60 seconds without bleeding. * Measuring of the pocket depth in the provided apertures in the healing abutments with an automated probe. * Removal of the Healing Abutment with the attached soft tissue en-bloque. * Placement of a new, regular, Encode Healing Abutment. * 10 weeks after Baseline: * Start of standard prosthetic procedure. In this study we expect that the soft tissue attachment (i.e. the gingival attachment) will be stronger and earlier achieved at the nano-structured healing abutments than at the normal, uncoated healing abutments. This would lead to a more stable soft tissue complex on the long rung and thus providing a more predictable aesthetic outcome. Secondly, a stronger attachment would mean a stronger barrier against micro-organisms and might influence the occurrence of peri-implantitis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREnormal healing abutment

Patient receives the normal, uncoated healing abutment on 1 of his (minimal 2) dental implants.

PROCEDUREnano-structured healing abutment

Patient receives the nano-structured healing abutment on 1 of his (minimal 2) dental implants.

Sponsors

University Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are eligible for this study if they are in need of minimum 2 dental implants and have sufficient bone to place these implants

Exclusion criteria

* All patients with limited bone * Periodontally compromised patients * Patients who took antibiotics 3 months before implantation * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes * Pregnant patients * Patients who received radiotherapy in the head/neck region * Patients under chemotherapy * Patients who had intravenous use of bisphosphonates

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The soft-tissue attachment around 2 different surfaces at 4 weeks post-implantation.at 4 weeks post-implantationGenetic evaluation (through Polymerase Chain Reaction, PCR, the tissue will be detected for certain growth factors), histomorphometric analysis to measure the actual percentage of the surface on which the gingiva is attached to, clinical evaluation of the strength of the attachment through means of an automated probe.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026