Skip to content

Phase III Cat-PAD Study

A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Centre Field Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Cat-PAD Peptide Immunotherapy in Cat Allergic Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01620762
Enrollment
1408
Registered
2012-06-15
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinoconjunctivitis

Keywords

Cat allergy, Rhinoconjunctivitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment effect of two treatment regimens of Cat-PAD vs placebo and to evaluates the treatment effect of Cat-PAD on symptoms, rescue medication usage and Quality of Life.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

1 dose every 4 weeks

1 dose every 4 weeks

Sponsors

inVentiv Health Clinical
CollaboratorOTHER
Pharm-Olam International
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Circassia Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, aged 12-65 years. * Moderate to severe rhinoconjunctivitis on exposure to cats for at least 2 years. * Subjects may optionally also have GINA Step 1 controlled asthma. * Positive skin prick test to cat hair. * Cat dander specific IgE ≥0.35 kU/L.

Exclusion criteria

* Asthma falling under the GINA definitions partly controlled and uncontrolled or Steps 2 to 5. * FEV1 \<80% of predicted. * Clinically significant confounding symptoms of allergy to seasonal allergens during the final evaluation period. * Skin prick test 5 mm greater than the negative control to perennial allergens or animal dander (other than cat) which cannot be avoided during the study. * Significant symptoms of another clinically relevant illness that is likely to affect scoring of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. * Clinically relevant abnormalities detected on physical examination. * History of severe drug allergy, severe angioedema or anaphylactic reaction to food.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo52-54 weeks after randomisationThe primary endpoint was the mean Combined Score (CS) measured over a 3 week period (52-54 weeks after randomisation) in the Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with the mean CS in the placebo group. A higher score indicated worse symptoms or greater use of medication and thus a low score indicated a better outcome. CS = Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) + Rescue Medication Score (RMS). Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=severe) and the total was divided by the number of symptoms to provide an average score per symptom of 0-3. RMS was scored from 0 (no allergy rescue medication use per day) to 3 (at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid per day). The RMS score was not additive, and therefore the maximum RMS was 3 and the maximum CS was 6.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo52-54 weeks after randomisationMean daily Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared to placebo groups TOSS was the sum of all the ocular symptom scores (itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes; sore eyes) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TOSS reflected more severe symptoms. Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.
Mean TRSS52-54 weeks after randomisationMean Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo. Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome), therefore TRSS could range from 0 to 24. Higher TRSS reflected more severe symptom scores. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.
Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo52-54 weeks after randomisationTNSS (Total nasal symptom score) was the sum of all the nasal symptom scores (runny nose; sneezing; blocked nose; itchy nose) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TNSS reflected more severe symptoms. Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.
Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo52-54 weeks after randomisationThe RQLQ (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) was completed by subjects at the end of the study (52-54 weeks after randomisation). The RQLQ is a validated method of assessing quality of life and has 28 questions in seven domains (activity limitation, sleep problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical problems and emotional function). Subjects recalled how their rhinoconjunctivitis had been during the last week and responded to each question on a seven-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment). The questions were equally weighted, and the RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 questions and could range from zero to six.
Number of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use52-54 week after randomisaitonThe number of well days, i.e., days with no moderately or severely annoying symptoms and with no rescue medication used was calculated for all subjects over a period of approximately 21 days, 52-54 weeks after randomisation.
Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo52-54 weeks after randomisationMean RMS (Rescue medication score) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo groups. The use of rhinoconjunctivitis rescue medications was recorded by the subject on a daily basis just before bedtime for approximately 21 days, 52-54 weeks after randomisation and was scored based on a previously published system as follows: 0 = no allergy rescue medication used per day; 0.5 = at least one dose of antihistamine eye drops used per day; 1 = at least one dose of oral antihistamine used per day; 2 = at least one dose of intranasal corticosteroid used per day; 3 = at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid used per day. The score was according to the highest level of rescue medication used and was not additive.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 Cat-PAD: 1 dose every 4 weeks Placebo: 1 dose every 4 weeks
468
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)
Cat-PAD Treatment regimen 2 Cat-PAD: 1 dose every 4 weeks
470
Placebo
Placebo Placebo: 1 dose every 4 weeks
470
Total1,408

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event952
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up111710
Overall StudyNon-specified365
Overall StudyProtocol deviation116
Overall StudyProtocol Violation111
Overall StudySubject deterioration011
Overall StudyUse of prohibted therapies011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject232627

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
29 Participants29 Participants32 Participants90 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
439 Participants441 Participants438 Participants1318 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
458 Participants468 Participants463 Participants1389 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
301 Participants317 Participants317 Participants935 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
167 Participants153 Participants153 Participants473 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
298 / 467299 / 470305 / 470
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 46713 / 4709 / 470

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo

The primary endpoint was the mean Combined Score (CS) measured over a 3 week period (52-54 weeks after randomisation) in the Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with the mean CS in the placebo group. A higher score indicated worse symptoms or greater use of medication and thus a low score indicated a better outcome. CS = Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) + Rescue Medication Score (RMS). Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=severe) and the total was divided by the number of symptoms to provide an average score per symptom of 0-3. RMS was scored from 0 (no allergy rescue medication use per day) to 3 (at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid per day). The RMS score was not additive, and therefore the maximum RMS was 3 and the maximum CS was 6.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo1.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.068
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo1.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.068
PlaceboMean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo1.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.068
Secondary

Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo

TNSS (Total nasal symptom score) was the sum of all the nasal symptom scores (runny nose; sneezing; blocked nose; itchy nose) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TNSS reflected more severe symptoms. Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo3.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.197
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo3.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.196
PlaceboMean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo3.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.196
Secondary

Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo

Mean daily Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared to placebo groups TOSS was the sum of all the ocular symptom scores (itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes; sore eyes) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TOSS reflected more severe symptoms. Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.179
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.178
PlaceboMean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo2.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.179
Secondary

Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo

Mean RMS (Rescue medication score) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo groups. The use of rhinoconjunctivitis rescue medications was recorded by the subject on a daily basis just before bedtime for approximately 21 days, 52-54 weeks after randomisation and was scored based on a previously published system as follows: 0 = no allergy rescue medication used per day; 0.5 = at least one dose of antihistamine eye drops used per day; 1 = at least one dose of oral antihistamine used per day; 2 = at least one dose of intranasal corticosteroid used per day; 3 = at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid used per day. The score was according to the highest level of rescue medication used and was not additive.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.038
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.037
PlaceboMean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo0.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.037
Secondary

Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo

The RQLQ (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) was completed by subjects at the end of the study (52-54 weeks after randomisation). The RQLQ is a validated method of assessing quality of life and has 28 questions in seven domains (activity limitation, sleep problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical problems and emotional function). Subjects recalled how their rhinoconjunctivitis had been during the last week and responded to each question on a seven-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment). The questions were equally weighted, and the RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 questions and could range from zero to six.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo1.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo1.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
PlaceboMean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo1.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
Secondary

Mean TRSS

Mean Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo. Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome), therefore TRSS could range from 0 to 24. Higher TRSS reflected more severe symptom scores. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks. 52-54 weeks after randomisation.

Time frame: 52-54 weeks after randomisation

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Mean TRSS5.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.358
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Mean TRSS5.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.356
PlaceboMean TRSS5.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.357
Secondary

Number of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use

The number of well days, i.e., days with no moderately or severely annoying symptoms and with no rescue medication used was calculated for all subjects over a period of approximately 21 days, 52-54 weeks after randomisation.

Time frame: 52-54 week after randomisaiton

Population: Only those subjects in the intent to treat (ITT) population with data at the end of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cat-PAD Treatment 1 (1 Course)Number of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use9.44 daysStandard Error 0.56
Cat-PAD Treatment 2 (2 Courses)Number of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use10.11 daysStandard Error 0.556
PlaceboNumber of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use9.76 daysStandard Error 0.557

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026