Skip to content

Price Changes and Hypothetical Food Purchases in Adult Grocery Shoppers

Experimental Analysis of Price Changes and Food Purchases in Obese and Lean Mothers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01619787
Acronym
Grocery
Enrollment
217
Registered
2012-06-14
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2017-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of Taxes and Subsides on Food Purchases in Mothers

Brief summary

The goal of the proposed study is to apply experimental economics in an online grocery store shopping model to examine the effects of pricing on hypothetical food purchases

Detailed description

Participants will be lean and overweight primary grocery shoppers aged 18 years and older. Participants will be considered lean if their body mass index (BMI = kg/m2) is less than 29.9, overweight if their BMI is greater than or equal to 30.12 To meet eligibility for the study, participants must be the guardian of a child at least 2 years or older, do the primary grocery shopping for the family, they must also report being weekly household grocery shoppers, and purchase the majority of their household's groceries once a week.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

18 or older primary shopper in the household, at least one child over 2 years of age

Exclusion criteria

eating disorders, not liking study foods

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Study CompletionChange in total calories as a result of taxes of 12.5% and 25%.
Change in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesStudy CompletionChange in total calories as a result of subsidies of 12.5% and 25%.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment in the Western New York Area targeted primary household grocery shoppers through the local community during 2011-2013.

Pre-assignment details

Interested eligible participants were screened and offered to start the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lean Participants
Participants whose baseline BMI is less than 25. All participants completed a baseline session where behavioral measures of delay discounting, relative reinforcing value and relative reinforcing efficacy were measured. Participants then completed five shopping sessions under various price conditions. Age and Body Mass Index were measured at the end of the six session study; therefore, 5 participants were lost to follow up and no age or body mass index are reported for these participants.
102
Overweight/Obese Participants
Participants whose baseline BMI is greater than or equal to 25. All participants completed a baseline session where behavioral measures of delay discounting, relative reinforcing value and relative reinforcing efficacy were measured. Participants then completed five shopping sessions under various price conditions. Age and Body Mass Index were measured at the end of the six session study; therefore, 5 participants were lost to follow up and no age or body mass index are reported for these participants.
110
Total212

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOverweight/Obese ParticipantsLean Participants
Age, Continuous42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Body Mass Index27.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
22.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
32.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Delay Discounting $100 reward (DD 100)0.7 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
0.7 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
0.7 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Delay Discounting $10 reward (DD 10)0.6 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
0.6 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
0.7 indifference proportion*delay proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
210 Participants110 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Female
204 Participants105 Participants99 Participants
Gender
Male
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
36 Participants22 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
162 Participants83 Participants79 Participants
Relative Reinforcing Value High Energy Dense Foods (RRV HED)14.7 Highest Response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.8
15.9 Highest Response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.1
13.8 Highest Response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.4
Relative Reinforcing Value Low Energy Dense Foods (RRV LED)25.2 Highest response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.9
23.9 Highest response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4
26.0 Highest response schedule completed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 217
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 217

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Energy Purchased as a Result of Subsidies

Change in total calories as a result of subsidies of 12.5% and 25%.

Time frame: Study Completion

Population: Data is reported for 199 participants. Out of 217 participants who started the study, 5 participants were lost to follow up, 1 participant shopped in the same store twice, 2 participants had conditions that would affect shopping, 2 participants did not report minority status and 8 male participants were excluded due to the small sample number.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 25 Condition10189.55 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 300.85
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 12.5 Condition10369.12 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 283.95
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Regular Condition10548.69 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 316.69
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 25 Condition11036.01 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 519.23
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Regular Condition10507.63 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 437.92
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 12.5 Condition10176.01 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 442.21
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 25 Condition10509.31 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 426.99
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Subsidy 12.5 Condition9704.67 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 405.05
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of SubsidiesCalories Purchased in the Regular Condition10311.12 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 456.04
Primary

Change in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.

Change in total calories as a result of taxes of 12.5% and 25%.

Time frame: Study Completion

Population: Data is reported for 199 participants. Out of 217 participants who started the study, 5 participants were lost to follow up, 1 participant shopped in the same store twice, 2 participants had conditions that would affect shopping, 2 participants did not report minority status and 8 male participants were excluded due to the small sample number.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 12.5 Condition10401.13 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 292.12
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Regular Condition10622.09 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 329.04
Online GroceryChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 25 Condition10180.17 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 304.13
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 12.5 Condition10512.95 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 523.1
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Regular Condition10507.62 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 427.92
Lean ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 25 Condition10471.42 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 464.73
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Regular Condition10311.12 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 456.04
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 25 Condition10184.04 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 436.78
Overweight/Obese ParticipantsChange in Energy Purchased as a Result of Taxes.Calories Purchased in the Tax 12.5 Condition9733.12 Total Calories PurchasedStandard Error 385.34

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026