Skip to content

Investigation of AVACEN Thermal Exchange System for Fibromyalgia Pain

Effects of a 4 Week AVACEN Treatment on Pain Perception in Fibromyalgia - An Open Label Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01619579
Acronym
AVACEN: TES
Enrollment
22
Registered
2012-06-14
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia, Pain, Non-Invasive, Arthritis, Rheumatoid Disease

Brief summary

Hypothesis: Daily use of the AVACEN Thermal Exchange System for 4 weeks will show improved Fibromyalgia pain and functioning markers, as assessed by biomarkers and clinical and psychological assessment. This non-invasive device is able to rapidly raise the core body temperature of the user by placing a hand in a vacuum chamber and resting it upon a heating element. The change in body temperature may change the sympathetic nervous system's activity and thereby reduce Fibromyalgia pain.

Interventions

DEVICEAVACEN Thermal Exchange System

Non-invasive device forms vacuum around subject's hand, enabling efficient core body temperature adjustment using heating element inside device.

Sponsors

University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
San Diego Veterans Healthcare System
CollaboratorFED
Avacen, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fibromyalgia diagnosis * Over the age of 18 * Understands English * Not pregnant/planning to become pregnant * Average pain of 4 or greater over the last week (10 point scale) * Fibromyalgia pain lasting longer than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant/Planning to become pregnant * Major unstable psychiatric illness * Major, uncontrolled systemic illness for which you may be hospitalized in the next 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment4 WeeksWidespread Pain Index (WPI) Score Range is 0 to 19 points. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 19 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). Widespread pain was defined as pain occurring in at least 2 contralateral body quadrants, in addition to the axial skeleton for at least 3 consecutive months.
Tender Point Count (TPC) After 4 Weeks Treatment4 WeeksTender Point Count (TPC) Score Range is 0 to 18. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 18 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). The criteria required confirming tenderness used 4kg of pressure applied to a total of 18 specified tender point sites. Fibromyalgia is diagnosed with a minimum tenderness count in 11 of 18 points.
Symptom Severity (SS) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment4 WeeksSymptom Severity (SS) Score Range is 0 to 12. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 12 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). The SS scale identifies the level of severity sum of 4 categories (Fatigue, Waking Unrefreshed, Cognitive Symptoms, Somatic Symptoms) over the past week, using this scale: 0 = no problem * slight or mild * moderate * severe: continuous, life-disturbing

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The design and the associated protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of California San Diego and the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were conducted at the UCSD Pain Medicine Clinic in San Diego, CA.

Pre-assignment details

Participants enrolled were diagnosed with FMS according to the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria and were advised to refrain from stopping, changing, or starting any new treatment programs other than the study intervention. Patients who recently started, stopped, or changed pain or mood treatment were ineligible to enroll until three months had elapsed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Group A
Treatment Group A (n=5) underwent one AVACEN Treatment Method (ATM) warming session for 10 minutes daily. The participants completed the warming treatment sessions at home.
5
Treatment Group B
Treatment Group B (n=17) underwent two AVACEN Treatment Method (ATM) warming sessions for 15 minutes daily. The participants completed the warming treatment sessions at home.
17
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Group BTreatment Group ATotal
Age, Customized
Age
52 years41 years48 years
Gender
Female
15 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Gender
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants5 participants22 participants
Symptom Severity (SS) Score9.3 units on a scale9.0 units on a scale9.2 units on a scale
Tender Point Count (TPC)14.07 units on a scale15.4 units on a scale14.4 units on a scale
Widespread Pain Index (WPI)15.0 units on a scale15.4 units on a scale15.1 units on a scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Symptom Severity (SS) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment

Symptom Severity (SS) Score Range is 0 to 12. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 12 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). The SS scale identifies the level of severity sum of 4 categories (Fatigue, Waking Unrefreshed, Cognitive Symptoms, Somatic Symptoms) over the past week, using this scale: 0 = no problem * slight or mild * moderate * severe: continuous, life-disturbing

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Enrolled population was diagnosed with FMS according to the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria. Three participants withdrew from the study for personal reasons and their post-therapy data were not obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Group ASymptom Severity (SS) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment8.4 units on a scale
Treatment Group BSymptom Severity (SS) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment7.4 units on a scale
Primary

Tender Point Count (TPC) After 4 Weeks Treatment

Tender Point Count (TPC) Score Range is 0 to 18. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 18 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). The criteria required confirming tenderness used 4kg of pressure applied to a total of 18 specified tender point sites. Fibromyalgia is diagnosed with a minimum tenderness count in 11 of 18 points.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Enrolled population was diagnosed with FMS according to the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria. Three participants withdrew from the study for personal reasons and their post-therapy data were not obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Group ATender Point Count (TPC) After 4 Weeks Treatment12.6 units on a scale
Treatment Group BTender Point Count (TPC) After 4 Weeks Treatment10.0 units on a scale
Primary

Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment

Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score Range is 0 to 19 points. 0 = Lowest pain score (Best Outcome). 19 = Highest pain score (Worst Outcome). Widespread pain was defined as pain occurring in at least 2 contralateral body quadrants, in addition to the axial skeleton for at least 3 consecutive months.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Enrolled population was diagnosed with FMS according to the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria. Three participants withdrew from the study for personal reasons and their post-therapy data were not obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Group AWidespread Pain Index (WPI) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment13.0 units on a scale
Treatment Group BWidespread Pain Index (WPI) Score After 4 Weeks Treatment8.9 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026