Skip to content

Comparing Driving Performance Among Trained and Untrained Drivers Using a Driving Simulator

Comparison of Driving Performance Among Trained and Untrained Novice Drivers: Validation of a Multidimensional Simulated Driving Assessment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01619202
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-06-14
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accident Prevention, Accidents, Traffic, Prevention Harmful Effects

Keywords

accident prevention, Adolescent, examination, automobile driver, Driving simulator, Young drivers, Driving education

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine differences in driving performance on a simulated driving assessment between novice teen drivers who receive the Risk Anticipation-Perception Training (RAPT) program and novice teen drivers who do not receive the training program.

Detailed description

Motor vehicle crashes remain the number one cause of death among teens in the United States. Teen drivers (ages 16 to 19) are four times more likely to be involved in fatal crashes than adult drivers (ages 25 to 69). Driving simulators are a safer alternative to on-road assessments that are often affordable and can provide experimental control for research. Though driving simulators have advantages for evaluating driving performance in teens, there are gaps in the literature on the validity of a multidimensional outcome of driving performance in a simulator. To further examine the validity of a multidimensional measure of driving performance in a simulator, we compare simulated driving performance among teens who are trained hazard anticipation-perception training and those who are not.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRisk Anticipation -Perception Training

Web-based computer training program designed to teach novice teen drivers how to properly scan for hazards

Sponsors

Pennsylvania Department of Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Holds a valid driver's license for less than or equal to 180 days * 16 - 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Self-reports claustrophobia, migraine headaches, and/or motion sickness * Females who are pregnant * Previously participated in another CHOP driving simulator study * Non-English Speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Simulated driving performance measured by the number of errors made or the lack thereof, during a series of simulated drives.at least 1 week after training or enrollmentSimulated driving performance will be measured by the number of driving errors made during the simulated drives. The simulated driving performance will be compared across each arm, Intervention and Control. Intervention arm: Simulated driving performance will be measured at least 1 week after completion of the RAPT (Hazard Awareness) training program; Control arm: Simulated driving performance will be measured after enrollment and completion of pre-assessment measures.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026