Skip to content

Validation Study for Robotic Surgery Simulator

Validation Study for Robotic Surgery Simulator

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01618994
Enrollment
14
Registered
2012-06-14
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

Robotic Simulator, EBL, Robotic Surgeons, Intuitive Surgical, simulation modules, benchmarks, Morristown Protocol, Study Surgeons, Control Surgeons, Expert Surgeons, dual-console daVinci system, blinded skill assessment

Brief summary

A study to determine whether completing a rigorous simulation protocol could provide novice robotic surgeons with actual advanced surgical skills in an operating room setting.

Detailed description

Objective: To determine whether a group of surgeons otherwise naive to robotic techniques could demonstrate proficiency during their first robotic supracervical hysterectomy having only received simulator and pig lab training. Primary outcome measure: As measured by time spent on the surgeon console from beginning of hysterectomy until the end of cervical amputation. Secondary Outcome measures: 1. Blood loss- as measured by the blood suctioned into the canister throughout the hysterectomy and at the end of the amputation discounting irrigation volume. 2. Surgical skill rating- All procedures will be recorded and rated by a blinded investigator according to a standardized surgical skills evaluation sheet. 3. Surgeon console biometrics- As measured by controller movements and grips 4. Novice robotic surgeon data: Descriptive Operative data of surgeons who did not participate in robotic simulator training. Methods: To create the simulator protocol, 5 robotic surgeons (each averaging \>75 robotic cases per year) performed all 28 simulation modules available on the da Vinci Skills Simulator. To establish expert benchmarks, they picked the 10 simulator modules they thought were most beneficial to robotic novices', and they performed each of these 10 modules to the best of their ability \>5 times. The data was used to create benchmarks in which all parameters of these 10 modules were taken into account (i.e. not just the time to completion). Thus the Morristown Protocol was established- whereby successful completion of the protocol required passing every parameter of all 10 simulator modules at the expert level. We then recruited community board-certified OB-GYN's who were completely naive to robotics and offered them full robotic training free-of-charge as long as they could pass the Morristown Protocol as their very first step in the training process. These study surgeons were given 24/7 access to the da Vinci Skills Simulator and simply asked to complete the protocol at their own pace. Within a week of doing so, they went through the standardized Intuitive Surgical pig lab and then performed their first ever robotic surgery- a supracervical hysterectomy- as our main outcome measure. These cases were performed using the dual-console daVinci system with one of the senior authors on the other console ready to step in if necessary. Two sets of comparative benchmarks for this surgical procedure has been established. Our expert surgeons each performed supracervical hysterectomies for the study- as did a group of control surgeons. These control surgeons had full robotic privileges but were not averaging more than 2 cases per month and had never used the simulator. Operative time, EBL, and a blinded skill assessment (of videos) were compared for all cases among the 3 surgeon groups using t-tests.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPerforming robotic supracervical hysterectomy

All groups were recorded, times and graded on their performance during a robotic supracervical hysterectomy

Sponsors

Intuitive Surgical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Atlantic Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must not have performed a da Vinci assisted surgery

Exclusion criteria

* prior experience on the da Vinci system or the robotic simulator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical TimeAt end of cervical amputationAs measured by time spent on the surgeon console from beginning of hysterectomy until the end of cervical amputation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood LossEnd of cervical amputationAs measured by the blood suctioned into the canister throughout the hysterectomy and at the end of the amputation discounting irrigation volume
Surgical Skill RatingWithin a month of the performed surgeryAll procedures will be recorded and rated by a blinded investigator according to a standardized surgical skills evaluation sheet
Surgeon Console Biometricsduring surgeryAs measured by controller movements and grip
Novice Robotic Surgeon DataWithin a month of the performed surgeryDescriptive Operative data of surgeons who did not participate in robotic simulator training

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026