Skip to content

QST in Context With Conditioned Pain Modulation

Quantitative Sensory Testing in Context With Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01618604
Acronym
CPM
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-06-13
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2013-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Conditioned Pain Modulation, Quantitative Sensory Testing, duration, correlation

Brief summary

Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is a phenomenon which isn't examined enough. Many factors of influence such as gender, age and psyche are already known - but the duration of such effects, their reliability and the correlation between standardized Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and CPM is still unknown. In this study the investigators expect to find parameters in QST that correlate with the efficacy of Conditioned Pain Modulation. Knowing factors that indicate high or low potential CPM could help finding patients-at-risk and adapting their therapy.

Detailed description

Conditioned Pain Modulation was firstly found in rats by electrical stimulation of their spinal cord and called Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls. In humans such experimental settings are impossible. That is why we need two noxious stimuli for provoking such an endogenous pain inhibition. Before the CPM setting begins, we will investigate our 32 healthy probands by basic QST following the protocol of DFNS (German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain). This assessment helps us to create a sensory profile for every proband and to look for correlations between QST parameters and CPM efficacy. Then the CPM setting follows. In our experimental design we use a test stimulus (TS) on the dominant forearm by thermode (normally 45-47°C, depending on the pain rating, we need scores \>NRS 60) and a conditioned stimulus (CS) on the other hand by cold water bath (10°C). Both stimuli must be rated on the numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-100 alone and in combination. A positive effect can be seen, if the difference between TS alone and TS in combination with CS is \>0. To learn more about the duration of CPM effects we decided to repeat four QST parameters (cold detection threshold, warm detection threshold, mechanical detection threshold and mechanical pain threshold) within 30 minutes after finishing the CPM part to detect changes of time. The whole study design will be repeated 24-72h hours later to increase the test-retest-reliability.

Interventions

PROCEDUREQuantitative Sensory Testing

following the standardized protocol of DFNS

test stimulus by hot thermode conditioned stimulus by cold water bath

PROCEDURERepetition of four QST parameters

* warm detection threshold (WDT) * cold detection threshold (CDT) * mechanical detection threshold (MDT) * mechanical pain threshold (MPT)

Sponsors

Ruhr University of Bochum
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy probands \>18 years * right-handedness * informed consent * no chronic pain * no drugs (but oral contraceptives) * no neurological diseases * no psychiatric diseases

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent * language deficits * left-handedness * not enough pain intensity by thermode or cold water bath * psychiatric disease, neurological diseases other chronic disease * chronic pain syndromes * pregnancy or lactation * permanent drug use, drug use in the last 14 days

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026