Sepsis, Shock,
Conditions
Keywords
Microcirculation, Hypnotics and Sedatives,, Propofol,, Midazolam
Brief summary
Previous studies have demonstrated that altered microvascular blood flow is an important marker of severe sepsis. Usually, these patients need invasive ventilatory support, frequent use of sedatives and it is unknown if these agents interfere or not on microvascular blood flow. The goal of this study was to compare effects of propofol and midazolam infusions on sublingual microcirculation of septic shock patients.
Interventions
Septic patients, after intubation, were initially sedated with propofol. During the second day of mechanical ventilation, propofol infusion was interrupted. When the patient awoke, the sedative drug was changed to midazolam. Sedation target was a Ramsay Scale score of 4 to 5.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Septic shock patients needing mechanical ventilation in pressure or volume-controlled mode.
Exclusion criteria
* age less than 18 years, * pregnancy, * non-sinus rhythm, and * contraindication of daily interruption of sedative drug, * mainly with the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs, or * patients with intracranial hypertension or epileptical status.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sublingual Microcirculatory Variables | Just before stopping propofol and thirty minutes after the start of midazolam infusion | Patients were sedated with propofol during the first 24 hours after intubation and with midazolam afterwards.Systemic hemodynamics and perfusion parameters were assessed at two time points: just before stopping propofol and thirty minutes after the start of midazolam infusion. At both steps, four microcirculatory sequences were acquired using sidestream darkfield imaging to access sublingual microcirculation |
Countries
Brazil