Skip to content

Evaluating the Response to Two Antiretroviral Medication Regimens in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women, Who Begin Antiretroviral Therapy Between 20 and 36 Weeks of Pregnancy, for the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission

A Phase IV Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Virologic Response and Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Potent Regimens in HIV Infected Women Initiating Triple Antiretroviral Regimens Between 20 and 36 Weeks of Pregnancy for the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission: NICHD P1081

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01618305
Enrollment
408
Registered
2012-06-13
Start date
2013-09-05
Completion date
2018-12-11
Last updated
2020-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

HIV-infected pregnant women who begin taking antiretroviral (ARV) medications in the late stages of pregnancy need an effective medication regimen to reduce the risk of transmitting HIV to their children. This study examined the virologic response, safety, and tolerability of two different ARV medication regimens in HIV-infected pregnant women who were between 20 and 36 weeks pregnant when they entered the study.

Detailed description

When initiating this study there were many ARV medications and combination regimens available to treat HIV-infected people. However, the number of ARV medications that had been studied in HIV-infected pregnant women for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission was limited. Although HIV-infected pregnant women who began taking ARV medications late in their pregnancies required effective therapy to reduce the risk of transmitting HIV to their children, there were no published data available that compared the effects of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) and integrase inhibitors (which are two classes of ARV medications) in pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety, tolerability, and virologic responses to two different medication regimens, each of which included an NNRTI or integrase inhibitor, in pregnant HIV-infected women who began ARV therapy late in their pregnancies (i.e., had gestational age between 20 and 36 weeks). This study was originally opened under IMPAACT P1081, protocol version 2.0 (version 1.0 never opened to accrual) as a three arm study. However, IMPAACT P1081 was closed due to slow accrual, at which point NICHD took over the study, streamlined it to two arms, and reopened it as NICHD P1081 under protocol Version 3.0. Women who enrolled under IMPAACT P1081 (N=20) and were randomized to one of the two continuing arms (efavirenz- or raltegravir-based ART; N=14) were included in NICHD P1081, while IMPAACT P1081 women randomized to the dropped arm (lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART; N=6) were not eligible for inclusion in NICHD P1081. In this study HIV-infected pregnant women were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Women in Arm A received lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg twice a day and efavirenz 600 mg each night. Women in Arm B received lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg twice a day and raltegravir 400 mg twice a day. All women were scheduled to receive their assigned medications from study entry through delivery. Antepartum study visits were scheduled at entry and Weeks 1, 2, and 4; and thereafter, every two weeks until labor and delivery. Study visits included a medical history review, physical examination, questionnaires, blood collection, and a vaginal swab procedure. While women were in labor, they were scheduled to continue to receive their study medications. Some women may have received additional or alternate medications according to local standard of care/guidelines. Women had a physical examination and blood collection at the delivery visit. After delivery, some women continued to receive ARV medications according to the local guidelines, and could have received study ARV for up to eight weeks postpartum while they transitioned to the ARV regimen indicated per their local standard of care. Women were scheduled to attend study visits following delivery at Weeks 2, 6, 16, and 24, which included a medical history review, physical examination, and blood collection. Select visits were scheduled to include a vaginal swab procedure. Some women had vaginal specimens stored for future research. Infants delivered on study were scheduled to receive ARV medications as prescribed by the babies' doctors per local standard of care/guidelines. Study visits for infants were scheduled at birth, and at Weeks 2, 6, 16, and 24. Each study visit included a medical history review, physical examination, and blood collection. Select visits included oral and nasopharyngeal swab collection.Some infants had oral and/or nasopharyngeal specimens stored for future research.

Interventions

DRUGLamivudine/zidovudine

Participants received one lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet twice a day from entry through delivery\*. \* Participants may have received a locally supplied nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone in place of lamivudine/zidovudine with permission of the protocol team obtained prior to randomization.

DRUGEfavirenz

Participants received one 600 mg tablet of efavirenz each night from entry through delivery.

DRUGRaltegravir

Participants received one 400 mg raltegravir tablet twice a day from entry through delivery.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Westat
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Naive to antiretroviral therapy (ART) or have received ART with short course zidovudine (maximum of 8 weeks) for prevention of mother-to-child transmission in previous pregnancies * Willing and able to sign informed consent. Participant must be of an age to provide legal informed consent as defined by the country in which the participant resides. If not, the informed consent must be signed by a legal guardian/parent, as per country guidelines. * Documentation of HIV-1 infection defined as positive results from two samples collected at different time points. The same method may be used at both time points. All samples tested must be whole blood, serum, or plasma. Documentation may be abstracted from medical records to satisfy these criteria for infection. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. * Viable pregnancy with gestational age of greater than or equal to 20 weeks to less than or equal to 36 weeks based upon menstrual history and/or ultrasound. Note: If menstrual history is unknown or if there is a discrepancy between menstrual history and ultrasound, determination of gestational age should be based upon best available methodology at each site. * Intends to continue pregnancy * Willingness and intent to deliver at the participating clinical site and to be followed for the duration of the study at the site or associated outpatient facility * Willing to comply with the study regimen * Agrees to use two reliable methods of contraception after delivery if randomized to the efavirenz arm and is sexually active. A barrier method of contraception (condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap) together with another reliable form of contraception must be used for 4 weeks after stopping efavirenz.

Exclusion criteria

* Active labor defined as onset of regular contractions or cervical dilatation greater than 2 cm * Use of ART during current pregnancy * Chemotherapy for active malignancy * HIV genotypic resistance, as defined in the protocol, to efavirenz or raltegravir or to NRTIs that will be included in the ART regimen. Note: A lack of HIV drug resistance test results at the time of enrollment is not exclusionary. * Serious active opportunistic infection and/or serious bacterial infection including active tuberculosis (TB) or unstable or severe medical condition within 14 days of study entry * Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements * Any clinically significant diseases (other than HIV infection) or clinically significant findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the outcome of this study * Vomiting or inability to swallow medications due to an active, pre-existing condition that prevents adequate swallowing and absorption of study medication * Known allergy/sensitivity to any study drugs or their formulations or sulfonamide allergy * The following laboratory values (within 30 days of enrollment): 1. Hemoglobin greater than or equal to Grade 3 2. Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to Grade 2 3. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than or equal to Grade 2 4. Serum creatinine greater than or equal to Grade 1 5. Platelet count greater than or equal to Grade 3 * Evidence of pre-eclampsia (such as persistent diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg) * Receipt of disallowed medications as described in the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Women With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at DeliveryMeasured at participants' delivery visit (or last visit within three weeks prior to delivery)If there was no viral load measurement at the delivery visit, the last viral load within three weeks prior to delivery was considered.
Proportion of Participants Who Discontinued Randomized Study Drug Prior to Labor and Delivery.Measured from entry through participants' delivery visit (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation)Only women who initiated (i.e. received at least one dose of) their randomized treatment were eligible for this outcome measure. Women were considered to have discontinued study drug if they stopped receiving efavirenz or raltegravir (whichever was assigned) prior to labor and delivery for any reason, including loss to follow-up.
Proportion of Women Who Experienced at Least One New Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 as Defined in the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicity TableMeasured from entry through participants' last study visit, approximately 24 weeks after deliveryNew adverse events were those with an onset date on or after randomization. Adverse events present at baseline would only be considered New if they increased in grade on or after randomization. All women who received at least one dose of study drug were eligible for this analysis.
Proportion of Infants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3.Measured from birth through infants' last study visit, approximately 24 weeks after deliveryAll infants who were live births on study were eligible for this analysis. Adverse event grades were defined based on the DAIDS toxicity table.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationMeasured at Weeks 4 and 6 from first dose of randomized treatment, prior to deliveryThe Week 4 and 6 participant viral loads were the viral load results obtained closest to (within four days of) the target date for that visit from initiation of treatment (for Week 4, day 24-32 after first dose; for Week 6, day 38-46 after first dose). Vaginal swabs produce much less testable sample volume than blood plasma draws. Each vaginal swab specimen had to be diluted, and this dilution factor raised the lower limit of quantification (LLQ). The most commonly observed LLQs were 300 and 1200. For consistency, the higher LLQ was considered the threshold for this outcome measure.
Infectivity of PlasmaMeasured on or after delivery up to participants' last postpartum study visit (approximately 26 weeks after delivery)The goal of this outcome measure was to address an objective relevant to protease inhibitors, one of which was originally included as a third arm in the Version 2.0 of the study. This outcome measure was included to assess how the infectivity of plasma changed over time among women receiving protease inhibitors, and whether this differed from other classes of antiretroviral drugs. However, the lopinavir/ritonavir arm was later dropped in Version 3.0, and only Version 2.0 women who received efavirenz or raltegravir were included in the study analyses. Therefore, because no women included in the study analyses received lopinavir/ritonavir, this outcome measure was not analyzed.
Proportion of Deliveries That Had an Outcome of a Stillbirth/Fetal Demise.Measured at delivery (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation)The unit of analysis was the mother-infant set. All sets where the woman received at least one dose of study treatment and remained on study through delivery were eligible. In the case of twins, the worst outcome (i.e. a stillbirth) was used.
Proportion of Deliveries That Were Premature (Less Than 37 Weeks Gestation)Measured at delivery (within 72 hours).The unit of analysis for this outcome measure was the mother-infant set. A mother-infant set was counted as having a premature delivery if any infant in the mother-infant set was delivered prior to 37 weeks gestation (i.e. in the case of twins, if either of the twins was delivered prior to 37 weeks gestation then this set would count as one premature delivery outcome). All mother-infant sets that delivered at least one live birth on study were eligible for this outcome.
Proportion of Deliveries That Were Extremely Premature (Less Than 34 Weeks Gestation).At delivery (within 72 hours).The unit of analysis for this outcome measure was the mother-infant set. A mother-infant set was counted as having an extremely premature delivery if any infant in the mother-infant set was delivered prior to 34 weeks gestation (i.e. in the case of twins, if either of the twins was delivered prior to 34 weeks gestation then this set would count as one extremely premature delivery outcome). Only women who enrolled prior to 34 weeks gestation were included in this analysis. Those that enrolled from 34 to less than 37 weeks gestation were excluded because they were already past the gestational age where this outcome could have occurred at entry.
Proportion of Women Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA Virologic Suppression Below the Lower Limit of Quantification of the Assay at DeliveryMeasured at participants' delivery visit (or last visit within three weeks prior to delivery)A successful outcome was defined as maternal HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load less than the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for the testing assay, which could vary. Most (99%) women had their viral load measured using an assay with LLQ equal to 40 or 20 copies/mL. If the viral load at delivery was missing, the last observed viral load within 21 days prior to the delivery date was considered.
Proportion of Deliveries With an Extremely Low Birth Weight (<1,500 Grams).Measured within 72 hours after deliveryThe unit of analysis was the mother-infant pair or set; in the case of multiple gestation, the worst outcome was considered in analysis (e.g. if two twins were delivered to one mother, one at 2,000 grams and one at 1,000 grams, this mother-infant set would count as one instance of extremely low birth weight in analysis because at least one of the infants had the outcome).
Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)Measured from birth through infants' last study visit at Week 24Infants were considered infected if they had both a positive HIV nucleic acid test and a subsequent confirmatory test on a different sample. Uninfected infants were those that had no positive test results and negative test results obtained at two or more of the following visits: Week 6, Week 16, and/or Week 24 postpartum.
Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study DrugsMeasured on or after confirmation of HIV-infection up to the infants' last study visit at Week 24Genotypic resistance to each class of study drug (reverse transcriptase inhibitors and integrase inhibitors) was assessed separately among HIV infected infants.
Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Measured at screening and at the time of inadequate virologic response (from Week 2 antepartum through participants' last study visit 24 weeks after delivery).Consensus sequencing was performed on a sample from screening. Women were evaluated for integrase and reverse transcriptase resistance mutations separately. Additionally, consensus sequencing was performed among women who had an inadequate virologic response (defined in the protocol) on a sample taken at that time of inadequate virologic response. Genotypic resistance among women who stopped antiretroviral therapy was not assessed. Because World Health Organization guidelines have been updated to indicate all people living with HIV should remain on antiretroviral therapy, even postpartum women, no women stopped antiretroviral therapy after delivery. Therefore, this aspect of the outcome measure is no longer relevant and was not assessed.
Proportion of Deliveries With a Low Birth Weight (Less Than 2,500 Grams)Measured within 72 hours after deliveryThe unit of analysis was the mother-infant pair or set; in the case of multiple gestation, the worst outcome was considered in analysis (e.g. if two twins were delivered to one mother, one at 2,000 grams and one at 3,000 grams, this mother-infant set would count as one instance of low birth weight in analysis because at least one of the infants had the outcome).
Proportion of Women With 1) Successful Viral Load (Plasma HIV-1 RNA VL) Decrease From Entry to Week 2 and VL Less Than 1,000 Copies/ml at All Time Points After 4 Weeks on Study Drugs, Until Delivery; and 2) Who Remain on the Assigned Study RegimenMeasured from entry through delivery (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation).A successful viral load decrease was defined as follows: for women having HIV-1 RNA viral load greater than or equal to 10,000 copies/mL at entry, a viral load \<200 copies/mL; for women with VL less than 10,000 copies/mL at entry, a Log10 viral load decrease of at least 2.0 from entry.
Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryMeasured at antepartum Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16.Change in viral load from entry (or screening, if there was no entry viral load) to each study week prior to delivery, calculated on the log10 scale as log10(week X RNA) - log10(baseline RNA). For this analysis, HIV-1 RNA values that were censored below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were imputed to be equal to the LLQ - 1.
Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationMeasured at Weeks 4 and 6 from first dose of randomized treatment, prior to deliveryThe Week 4 and 6 participant viral loads were the viral load results obtained closest to (within four days of) the target date for that visit from initiation of treatment (for Week 4, day 24-32 after first dose; for Week 6, day 38-46 after first dose).

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

IMPAACT P1081 (protocol version 2.0) enrolled participants from September, 2013 through November, 2014. Enrollment under NICHD P1081 (protocol version 3.0) resumed in July 2015 and continued through February, 2018. Participants enrolled at sites in Argentina (2), Brazil (7), South Africa (1), Tanzania (1), Thailand (3), and the United States (5).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 1-to-1 to Arm A (efavirenz) or Arm B (raltegravir) with stratification by gestational age at enrollment (20 to \<28 weeks; 28 to \<31 weeks; 31 to \<34 weeks; 34 to \<37 weeks) and NRTI backbone (lamivudine/zidovudine or alternative, locally-supplied NRTI regimen), and dynamic balancing by study site.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (Women)
Pregnant women received ZDV/3TC + EFV Lamivudine/zidovudine: Participants received one lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet twice a day from entry through delivery\*. \* Participants may have received a locally supplied nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone in place of lamivudine/zidovudine with permission of the protocol team obtained prior to randomization. Efavirenz: Participants received one 600 mg tablet of efavirenz each night from entry through delivery.
202
Arm B (Women)
Pregnant women received ZDV/3TC + RAL Lamivudine/zidovudine: Participants received one lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet twice a day from entry through delivery\*. \* Participants may have received a locally supplied nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone in place of lamivudine/zidovudine with permission of the protocol team obtained prior to randomization. Raltegravir: Participants received one 400 mg raltegravir tablet twice a day from entry through delivery.
206
Total408

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up117
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (Women)Arm B (Women)Total
Absolute CD4 Count408 cells/mm^3389.5 cells/mm^3395 cells/mm^3
Age, Continuous25.4 years26.9 years26.5 years
Gestational Age
20-<28 weeks
102 Participants103 Participants205 Participants
Gestational Age
28-<31 weeks
48 Participants50 Participants98 Participants
Gestational Age
31-<34 weeks
31 Participants29 Participants60 Participants
Gestational Age
34-<37 weeks
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load4.1 Log10 copies/mL4.1 Log10 copies/mL4.1 Log10 copies/mL
NRTI Background Regimen
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir (FTC/TDF)
31 Participants33 Participants64 Participants
NRTI Background Regimen
Lamivudine and Tenofovir (3TC/TDF)
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
NRTI Background Regimen
Zidovudine and Lamivudine (ZDV/3TC)
170 Participants171 Participants341 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
24 Participants23 Participants47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, Not Hispanic
74 Participants72 Participants146 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic, Latino
101 Participants108 Participants209 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Not Hispanic
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
8 participants12 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
94 participants96 participants190 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
42 participants42 participants84 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
24 participants23 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
202 Participants206 Participants408 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1971 / 2061 / 1941 / 199
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 19724 / 20620 / 19415 / 199
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 20234 / 20631 / 19450 / 199

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Infants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3.

All infants who were live births on study were eligible for this analysis. Adverse event grades were defined based on the DAIDS toxicity table.

Time frame: Measured from birth through infants' last study visit, approximately 24 weeks after delivery

Population: All live born infants were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Infants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3..25 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Infants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3..25 Proportion
p-value: 0.938Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Proportion of Participants Who Discontinued Randomized Study Drug Prior to Labor and Delivery.

Only women who initiated (i.e. received at least one dose of) their randomized treatment were eligible for this outcome measure. Women were considered to have discontinued study drug if they stopped receiving efavirenz or raltegravir (whichever was assigned) prior to labor and delivery for any reason, including loss to follow-up.

Time frame: Measured from entry through participants' delivery visit (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation)

Population: Five women (all in Arm A) never initiated treatment, and thus were not included in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Participants Who Discontinued Randomized Study Drug Prior to Labor and Delivery..05 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Participants Who Discontinued Randomized Study Drug Prior to Labor and Delivery..03 Proportion
p-value: 0.557Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Proportion of Women Who Experienced at Least One New Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 as Defined in the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicity Table

New adverse events were those with an onset date on or after randomization. Adverse events present at baseline would only be considered New if they increased in grade on or after randomization. All women who received at least one dose of study drug were eligible for this analysis.

Time frame: Measured from entry through participants' last study visit, approximately 24 weeks after delivery

Population: Five women (all in Arm A) never initiated their assigned study treatment and were not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women Who Experienced at Least One New Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 as Defined in the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicity Table.30 Propotion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women Who Experienced at Least One New Adverse Event of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 as Defined in the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicity Table.30 Propotion
p-value: 0.909Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Proportion of Women With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery

If there was no viral load measurement at the delivery visit, the last viral load within three weeks prior to delivery was considered.

Time frame: Measured at participants' delivery visit (or last visit within three weeks prior to delivery)

Population: Eligible women were those with plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load at (or within three weeks prior to) delivery. Evaluable women had HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load greater than or equal to 200 at entry (i.e. did not already have the outcome) and had resistance testing results (on a sample taken at screening) showing no genotypic resistance to any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery.84 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery.94 Proportion
p-value: 0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)

Infants were considered infected if they had both a positive HIV nucleic acid test and a subsequent confirmatory test on a different sample. Uninfected infants were those that had no positive test results and negative test results obtained at two or more of the following visits: Week 6, Week 16, and/or Week 24 postpartum.

Time frame: Measured from birth through infants' last study visit at Week 24

Population: Infants who had no positive test result, but did not have negative results at at least two of Week 6, 16, and/or 24 postpartum visits were not eligible for this analysis. All infants who had at least one positive test also had a positive confirmation test, and are included in this outcome.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (Women)Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)HIV-infected6 Participants
Arm A (Women)Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)HIV-uninfected178 Participants
Arm B (Women)Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)HIV-infected1 Participants
Arm B (Women)Infant HIV Infection Status (Per International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group [IMPAACT] Definitions)HIV-uninfected189 Participants
Comparison: The proportion of HIV-infected infants among those who had a determinable HIV-infection status was compared between arms.p-value: 0.064Fisher Exact
Secondary

Infectivity of Plasma

The goal of this outcome measure was to address an objective relevant to protease inhibitors, one of which was originally included as a third arm in the Version 2.0 of the study. This outcome measure was included to assess how the infectivity of plasma changed over time among women receiving protease inhibitors, and whether this differed from other classes of antiretroviral drugs. However, the lopinavir/ritonavir arm was later dropped in Version 3.0, and only Version 2.0 women who received efavirenz or raltegravir were included in the study analyses. Therefore, because no women included in the study analyses received lopinavir/ritonavir, this outcome measure was not analyzed.

Time frame: Measured on or after delivery up to participants' last postpartum study visit (approximately 26 weeks after delivery)

Population: Because the study arm that was associated with this outcome measure was dropped, no women were assessed for this outcome.

Secondary

Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to Delivery

Change in viral load from entry (or screening, if there was no entry viral load) to each study week prior to delivery, calculated on the log10 scale as log10(week X RNA) - log10(baseline RNA). For this analysis, HIV-1 RNA values that were censored below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were imputed to be equal to the LLQ - 1.

Time frame: Measured at antepartum Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16.

Population: Women were included in each week below if they had not delivered prior to that week and had an RNA viral load result for that antepartum visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 2-1.8 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 10-2.3 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 6-2.1 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 12-2.4 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 4-2.0 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 14-2.5 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 8-2.2 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 16-2.5 Log10 copies/mL
Arm A (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 1-1.4 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 16-2.7 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 1-1.5 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 2-2.1 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 4-2.4 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 6-2.4 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 8-2.4 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 10-2.3 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 12-2.5 Log10 copies/mL
Arm B (Women)Log10 Change in Viral Load From Entry to Each Time Point Prior to DeliveryWeek 14-2.5 Log10 copies/mL
Secondary

Proportion of Deliveries That Had an Outcome of a Stillbirth/Fetal Demise.

The unit of analysis was the mother-infant set. All sets where the woman received at least one dose of study treatment and remained on study through delivery were eligible. In the case of twins, the worst outcome (i.e. a stillbirth) was used.

Time frame: Measured at delivery (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation)

Population: Fourteen women (8 in Arm A and 6 in Arm B) were off-study prior to delivery (including the 5 women in Arm A who never initiated study treatment).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Had an Outcome of a Stillbirth/Fetal Demise..005 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Had an Outcome of a Stillbirth/Fetal Demise..015 Proportion
p-value: 0.623Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Deliveries That Were Extremely Premature (Less Than 34 Weeks Gestation).

The unit of analysis for this outcome measure was the mother-infant set. A mother-infant set was counted as having an extremely premature delivery if any infant in the mother-infant set was delivered prior to 34 weeks gestation (i.e. in the case of twins, if either of the twins was delivered prior to 34 weeks gestation then this set would count as one extremely premature delivery outcome). Only women who enrolled prior to 34 weeks gestation were included in this analysis. Those that enrolled from 34 to less than 37 weeks gestation were excluded because they were already past the gestational age where this outcome could have occurred at entry.

Time frame: At delivery (within 72 hours).

Population: There were 393 live-birth infants on study. There were three sets of twins, leaving 390 mother-infant sets that delivered at least one live birth on study. Among these, five were missing gestational age at delivery (three EFV and two RAL sets) and 45 were enrolled from 34 to less than 37 weeks gestation and excluded, leaving 340 evaluable sets.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Were Extremely Premature (Less Than 34 Weeks Gestation)..036 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Were Extremely Premature (Less Than 34 Weeks Gestation)..023 Proportion
p-value: 0.54Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Deliveries That Were Premature (Less Than 37 Weeks Gestation)

The unit of analysis for this outcome measure was the mother-infant set. A mother-infant set was counted as having a premature delivery if any infant in the mother-infant set was delivered prior to 37 weeks gestation (i.e. in the case of twins, if either of the twins was delivered prior to 37 weeks gestation then this set would count as one premature delivery outcome). All mother-infant sets that delivered at least one live birth on study were eligible for this outcome.

Time frame: Measured at delivery (within 72 hours).

Population: There were 393 live-birth infants on study. There were three sets of twins, leaving 390 mother-infant sets that delivered at least one live birth on study. Five sets (three EFV and two RAL) did not have gestational age at delivery recorded and were excluded, leaving 385 sets included in this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Were Premature (Less Than 37 Weeks Gestation).105 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Deliveries That Were Premature (Less Than 37 Weeks Gestation).123 Proportion
p-value: 0.63Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Deliveries With a Low Birth Weight (Less Than 2,500 Grams)

The unit of analysis was the mother-infant pair or set; in the case of multiple gestation, the worst outcome was considered in analysis (e.g. if two twins were delivered to one mother, one at 2,000 grams and one at 3,000 grams, this mother-infant set would count as one instance of low birth weight in analysis because at least one of the infants had the outcome).

Time frame: Measured within 72 hours after delivery

Population: All women who delivered at least one live-birth infant on-study were included in this analysis. Although 393 live-born infants were delivered, there were three sets of twins. Therefore, 390 mother-infant pairs were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Deliveries With a Low Birth Weight (Less Than 2,500 Grams).124 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Deliveries With a Low Birth Weight (Less Than 2,500 Grams).127 Proportion
p-value: >0.99Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Deliveries With an Extremely Low Birth Weight (<1,500 Grams).

The unit of analysis was the mother-infant pair or set; in the case of multiple gestation, the worst outcome was considered in analysis (e.g. if two twins were delivered to one mother, one at 2,000 grams and one at 1,000 grams, this mother-infant set would count as one instance of extremely low birth weight in analysis because at least one of the infants had the outcome).

Time frame: Measured within 72 hours after delivery

Population: All women who delivered at least one live-birth infant on-study were included in this analysis. Although 393 live-born infants were delivered, there were three sets of twins. Therefore, 390 mother-infant pairs were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Deliveries With an Extremely Low Birth Weight (<1,500 Grams)..000 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Deliveries With an Extremely Low Birth Weight (<1,500 Grams)..005 Proportion
p-value: >0.99Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study Drugs

Genotypic resistance to each class of study drug (reverse transcriptase inhibitors and integrase inhibitors) was assessed separately among HIV infected infants.

Time frame: Measured on or after confirmation of HIV-infection up to the infants' last study visit at Week 24

Population: One infant in the efavirenz arm did not have a specimen collected with sufficient viral load to perform consensus sequencing. All other infected infants had genotypic resistance results for both classes of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study DrugsReverse transcriptase resistance.20 Proportion
Arm A (Women)Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study DrugsIntegrase resistance.00 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study DrugsReverse transcriptase resistance.00 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of HIV-infected Infants With Genotypic Resistance to Study DrugsIntegrase resistance.00 Proportion
Secondary

Proportion of Women Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA Virologic Suppression Below the Lower Limit of Quantification of the Assay at Delivery

A successful outcome was defined as maternal HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load less than the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for the testing assay, which could vary. Most (99%) women had their viral load measured using an assay with LLQ equal to 40 or 20 copies/mL. If the viral load at delivery was missing, the last observed viral load within 21 days prior to the delivery date was considered.

Time frame: Measured at participants' delivery visit (or last visit within three weeks prior to delivery)

Population: Eligible women were those that had a plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load at (or within 21 days prior to) delivery. Evaluable women were those with HIV-1 RNA viral load \>200 copies/mL at baseline, and results from genotypic testing performed on a sample taken at screening indicating no genotypic resistance to any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA Virologic Suppression Below the Lower Limit of Quantification of the Assay at Delivery.58 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA Virologic Suppression Below the Lower Limit of Quantification of the Assay at Delivery.86 Proportion
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Women With 1) Successful Viral Load (Plasma HIV-1 RNA VL) Decrease From Entry to Week 2 and VL Less Than 1,000 Copies/ml at All Time Points After 4 Weeks on Study Drugs, Until Delivery; and 2) Who Remain on the Assigned Study Regimen

A successful viral load decrease was defined as follows: for women having HIV-1 RNA viral load greater than or equal to 10,000 copies/mL at entry, a viral load \<200 copies/mL; for women with VL less than 10,000 copies/mL at entry, a Log10 viral load decrease of at least 2.0 from entry.

Time frame: Measured from entry through delivery (approximately 36 to 40 weeks gestation).

Population: Women were evaluable for this outcome measure if they had (1) a valid viral load result at Week 2 (day 11-17 after initiation of study drug), (2) initiated study drug, and (3) delivered on- study; evaluable women who delivered after 28 days on study drug additionally had (4) at least one viral load result after 28 days on study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With 1) Successful Viral Load (Plasma HIV-1 RNA VL) Decrease From Entry to Week 2 and VL Less Than 1,000 Copies/ml at All Time Points After 4 Weeks on Study Drugs, Until Delivery; and 2) Who Remain on the Assigned Study Regimen.63 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With 1) Successful Viral Load (Plasma HIV-1 RNA VL) Decrease From Entry to Week 2 and VL Less Than 1,000 Copies/ml at All Time Points After 4 Weeks on Study Drugs, Until Delivery; and 2) Who Remain on the Assigned Study Regimen.89 Proportion
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.

Consensus sequencing was performed on a sample from screening. Women were evaluated for integrase and reverse transcriptase resistance mutations separately. Additionally, consensus sequencing was performed among women who had an inadequate virologic response (defined in the protocol) on a sample taken at that time of inadequate virologic response. Genotypic resistance among women who stopped antiretroviral therapy was not assessed. Because World Health Organization guidelines have been updated to indicate all people living with HIV should remain on antiretroviral therapy, even postpartum women, no women stopped antiretroviral therapy after delivery. Therefore, this aspect of the outcome measure is no longer relevant and was not assessed.

Time frame: Measured at screening and at the time of inadequate virologic response (from Week 2 antepartum through participants' last study visit 24 weeks after delivery).

Population: Women were excluded if they had indeterminate or unknown resistance results for that class of antiretroviral study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Integrase resistance at screening.00 Proportion
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Reverse transcriptase resistance at screening.07 Proportion
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Reverse transcriptase resistance at viral failure.60 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Reverse transcriptase resistance at viral failure.30 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Integrase resistance at screening.00 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Integrase resistance at viral failure.00 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations at Screening, 2-4 Weeks Postpartum in Women Who Stopped Antiretroviral Therapy, and at the Time of Inadequate Virologic Response Using Standard and Ultrasensitive Methods.Reverse transcriptase resistance at screening.11 Proportion
Secondary

Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment Initiation

The Week 4 and 6 participant viral loads were the viral load results obtained closest to (within four days of) the target date for that visit from initiation of treatment (for Week 4, day 24-32 after first dose; for Week 6, day 38-46 after first dose).

Time frame: Measured at Weeks 4 and 6 from first dose of randomized treatment, prior to delivery

Population: Women were evaluable for Week 4 and/or Week 6 if they did not deliver prior to that study week and had at least one HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load obtained within 4 days of the target date from treatment initiation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 4.75 Proportion
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 6.85 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 4.95 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Plasma Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 6.96 Proportion
Secondary

Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment Initiation

The Week 4 and 6 participant viral loads were the viral load results obtained closest to (within four days of) the target date for that visit from initiation of treatment (for Week 4, day 24-32 after first dose; for Week 6, day 38-46 after first dose). Vaginal swabs produce much less testable sample volume than blood plasma draws. Each vaginal swab specimen had to be diluted, and this dilution factor raised the lower limit of quantification (LLQ). The most commonly observed LLQs were 300 and 1200. For consistency, the higher LLQ was considered the threshold for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Measured at Weeks 4 and 6 from first dose of randomized treatment, prior to delivery

Population: Participants were included if they had a valid RNA results at Week 4 and/or Week 6, and had not delivered prior to obtaining the viral load measurement for that week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 4.97 Proportion
Arm A (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 6.98 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 4.95 Proportion
Arm B (Women)Proportion of Women With HIV-1 RNA Vaginal Viral Load Less Than 1200 Copies/mL at Weeks 4 and 6 From Treatment InitiationWeek 6.94 Proportion

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026