Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
TMD, temporomandibular, dextrose, prolotherapy
Brief summary
Dysfunction of the jaw, associated with pain in the jaw or about the jaw in the face can be quite long lasting and debilitating. Dextrose injection with a small needle has be notably helpful in preliminary studies in reducing pain and improving jaw function. This randomized trial will compare dextrose injection with saline injection for temporomandibular(jaw) dysfunction, also known as TMD.
Detailed description
Longitudinal studies of subjects with temporomandibular dysfunction show a general pattern of symptom diminishment, especially in the elderly. However studies out to 2-8 years show residual symptoms in many and nearly 25% with unabated symptoms. Dextrose injection has been utilized empirically for many years and a marked reduction in pain and luxation after intraarticular and pericapsular dextrose injection has been reported in a recent RCT. However, small study size and lack of a non injection control have prevented any definitive conclusions as the additional efficacy of including dextrose in the injectate. The mechanism of action of dextrose injection was originally thought to be via a brief stimulation of the inflammatory cascade with resultant production of growth factors. However, non-inflammatory dextrose effects on growth factor production have been demonstrated, and, more recently, dextrose has been found to treat neurogenic inflammation (pain from upregulation of the TRPV1 receptor on peptidergic nerves). This has the theoretical benefit of reducing pain, regardless of the status and position of the intraarticular cartilage or degree of degenerative change of the TMD. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the ability of dextrose injection versus saline injection to reduce pain and improve functional complaints referable to the temporomandibular joint.
Interventions
Injection at 0, 1, and 2 months of 1 ml of a solution consisting of 20% dextrose and 0.2% lidocaine.
OTHERInjection of 1 ml of 0.8 SW/0.2% lidocaine
Injection at 0, 1, and 2 months of 1 ml of a solution consisting of 0.8 sterile water and 0.2% lidocaine.
Sponsors
Zarate, Miguel, M.D.
Frusso, Ricardo, M.D.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Facial Pain NRS rating \> 5/10 * Jaw symptom rating \> 5/10 * Jaw function issues seen on examination
Exclusion criteria
* Any potential acute dental issue * Rheumatic inflammatory disease * Chronic intake of NSAIDs or corticosteroids. * Pain in other body location worse than jaw pain * Pain 10/10 in other body location.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 50% or more improvement in 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for for jaw dysfunction from baseline to 1 year | 1 year | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A 50% reduction in the 0-10 NRS is a clinically important outcome. |
| 50% or more improvement in 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for for jaw pain from baseline to 1 year | 1 year | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A 50% reduction in the 0-10 NRS is a clinically important outcome. |
| Change from baseline to 1 year in a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Jaw Dysfunction | 1 year | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable An improvement is a reduction in the NRS scale. |
| Change from baseline to 3 months in a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Jaw Pain | 3 months | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable An improvement is a reduction in the NRS scale. |
| 50% or more improvement in 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Jaw pain from baseline to 3 months | 3 months | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A 50% reduction in the 0-10 NRS is a clinically important outcome. |
| Change from baseline to 3 months in a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for jaw dysfunction. | 3 months | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable An improvement is a reduction in the NRS scale. |
| 50% or more improvement in 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for for jaw dysfunction to 3 months | 3 months | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A 50% reduction in the 0-10 NRS is a clinically important outcome. |
| Change from baseline to 1 year in a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for jaw pain | 1 year | Anchors include 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable An improvement is a reduction in the NRS scale. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction to 3 months as measured by a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) | 3 months | Anchors include 0 = no satisfaction and 10 = complete satisfaction |
| Change in mouth opening in millimeters from baseline to 3 months as manually measured by a Therabite. | 3 months | An increase in mouth opening in millimeters is considered an improvement in this study. |
Countries
Argentina
Outcome results
None listed