Skip to content

Wet Macular Degeneration Study to Compare Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab to Aflibercept

A Single Arm, Investigator Initiated Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Subjects With Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration Previously Treated With Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab (ASSESS Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01617148
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-06-12
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2018-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exudative Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Exudative Macular Degeneration, Aflibercept

Brief summary

This study will examine the use of Aflibercept in patients with exudative macular degeneration requiring intravitreal injections. Patients will be followed for 24 months. The follow up phase will be completed at month 36.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to examine the use of Aflibercept in patients who have been previously treated with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for exudative macular degeneration. Specifically, we will examine its effect on macular degeneration, measured by SDOCT (Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography) and ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity. This will be a prospective study with patients to receive an intravitreal injection of Aflibercept at the time of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGAflibercept

Patients received 2 mg (0.05 mL) of intravitreal aflibercept injection administered monthly for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 2 months as per the drug label for the next 9 months.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Rishi Singh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A subject must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: 1. Signed Informed Consent. 2. Men and women ≥ 50 years of age. 3. Active primary subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions secondary to AMD, including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by historical optical coherence tomographies (OCTs) and angiograms in the study eye. 4. CNV must be at least 50% of total lesion size by either previous or current angiogram. 5. ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity of: 20/25 to 20/320 (letter score of 73 to 25) in the study eye. 6. Willing, committed, and able to return for all clinic visits and complete all study related procedures. 7. At least one injection of Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab within 3 months of enrollment for active exudative AMD. 8. Active need for anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy at study entry based on the following criteria: 1. Presence of fluid by either optical coherence tomography (OCT) or clinical examination (further defined as intraretinal, cystoid, subretinal, worsening pigment epithelial detachment) 2. Presence of new hemorrhage on clinical examination

Exclusion criteria

A subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: 1. Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat neovascular AMD in the study eye, except dietary supplements or vitamins. 2. Prior systemic anti-VEGF therapy, investigational or FDA/Health Canada approved, is only allowed up to 3 months prior to first dose, and will not be allowed during the study. 3. Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the study 4. History of any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 in the study eye. 5. Presence of other causes of CNV, including pathologic myopia (spherical equivalent of -8 diopters or more negative, or axial length of 25 mm or more), ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture, or multifocal choroiditis in the study eye. 6. History or clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema or any other vascular disease affecting the retina, other than AMD, in either eye. 7. Prior vitrectomy in the study eye. 8. History of retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment in the study eye. 9. Any history of macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye. 10. Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months of Day 1 on the study eye, except lid surgery, which may not have taken place within 1 month of day 1, as long as it's unlikely to interfere with the injection. 11. Prior trabeculectomy or other filtration surgery in the study eye. 12. Uncontrolled glaucoma at baseline evaluation (defined as intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication) in the study eye. 13. Active intraocular inflammation in either eye. 14. Active ocular or periocular infection in either eye. 15. Any ocular or periocular infection within the last 2 weeks prior to Screening in either eye. 16. Any history of uveitis in either eye. 17. Active scleritis or episcleritis in either eye. 18. Presence or history of scleromalacia in either eye. 19. Aphakia or pseudophakia with absence of posterior capsule (unless it occurred as a result of a yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) posterior capsulotomy) in the study eye. 20. Previous therapeutic radiation in the region of the study eye. 21. History of corneal transplant or corneal dystrophy in the study eye. 22. Significant media opacities, including cataract, in the study eye which might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of safety, or fundus photography. 23. Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g. cataract) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could require either medical or surgical intervention during the 52 week study period. 24. Any concurrent ocular condition in the study eye which, in the opinion of the investigator, could either increase the risk to the subject beyond what is to be expected from standard procedures of intraocular injection, or which otherwise may interfere with the injection procedure or with evaluation of efficacy or safety. 25. Participation as a subject in any clinical study within the 12 weeks prior to Day 1. 26. Any systemic with an investigational agent in the past 3 months prior to Day 1. 27. The use of long acting intraocular steroids or photodynamic therapy in the 6 months prior to day 1. 28. Any history of allergy to povidone iodine. 29. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 30. Women of childbearing potential\* who are unwilling to practice adequate contraception during the study (adequate contraceptive measures include stable use of oral contraceptives or other prescription pharmaceutical contraceptives for 2 or more menstrual cycles prior to screening; intrauterine device (IUD); bilateral tubal ligation; vasectomy; condom plus contraceptive sponge, foam, or jelly, or diaphragm plus contraceptive sponge, foam, or jelly) * \*Postmenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months in order not to be considered of child bearing potential. Pregnancy testing and contraception are not required for women with documented hysterectomy or tubal ligation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline at 12 Monthsbaseline and 12 monthsThe mean absolute change from baseline central subfield thickness at 12 months as measured by SDOCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Macular Volume From Baseline at 12 Months.baseline and 12 monthsMean absolute change from baseline in macular volume at 12 months.
Change in Cube Average Thickness From Baseline at 12 Monthsbaseline and 12 monthsMean absolute change in cube average thickness as measured by SDOCT from baseline at 12 months.
Percentage of Patients Who Gained Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Months.baseline and 12 monthsThe percentage of patients who gained greater than 15 letters of vision from baseline to 12 months.
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 monthsThe mean absolute change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity score at 12 months as measured by Eletronic-Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Scale (E-ETDRS) protocol. There were no sub scales used. These are common methods for ophthalmology studies to report their findings. The scale provided is the Electronic-Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Scale (E-ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity scale. Values that are higher are considered better and values that are lower are considered worse. Minimum E-ETDRS was 24 E-ETDRS letters and maximum E-ETDRS was 80 E-ETDRS letters.
Percentage of Subjects Who Were 20/40 or Better at Month 12.month 12Percentage of subjects who had vision acuity of 20/40 or better at month 12.
Percentage of Subjects Who Were 20/200 or Worse at Month 12.month 12Percentage of subjects who had visual acuity of 20/200 or worse at month 12.
Percentage of Patients Who Lost Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Monthsbaseline and 12 monthsThe percentage of patients who lost greater than 15 letters of vision from baseline at 12 months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Group
Subjects were included in the study if they met the following criteria: (1) active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to exudative AMD confirmed by fluorescein angiography (2) E-ETDRS vision of 25 to 80 letters (Snellen equivalent of \ 20/25 to 20/320) (3) at least one prior injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab or 0.5 mg ranibizumab (Avastin and Lucentis, respectively; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA) within 3 months of enrollment, and (4) had an initial response on optical coherence tomography (OCT) defined as a decrease of retinal edema and/or subretinal fluid to anti-VEGF injections followed by recurrent increase in fluid on OCT (further defined as intraretinal, cystoid, subretinal fluid, or worsening pigment epithelial detachment) or the presence of a new hemorrhage on clinical examination.
26
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Group
Age, Continuous78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Average number of injections during study7.92 injections
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.27
Average number of treatments prior to study entry9.62 injections
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Best Corrected Visual Acuity Snellen equivalent0.25 E-ETDRS letters
Central subfield thickness304.08 µm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 75.44
E-ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score56.42 E-ETDRS letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.04
Length of time since diagnosis of exudative AMD14 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Previous treatment
Previous treatment- Bevacizumab
7 Participants
Previous treatment
Previous treatment- Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab
2 Participants
Previous treatment
Previous treatment- Ranibizumab
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
26 Participants
Time since last injection prior to study enrollment50 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline at 12 Months

The mean absolute change from baseline central subfield thickness at 12 months as measured by SDOCT

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single GroupChange in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline at 12 Months-50.3 µmStandard Deviation 63.9
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 12 Months

The mean absolute change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity score at 12 months as measured by Eletronic-Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Scale (E-ETDRS) protocol. There were no sub scales used. These are common methods for ophthalmology studies to report their findings. The scale provided is the Electronic-Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Scale (E-ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity scale. Values that are higher are considered better and values that are lower are considered worse. Minimum E-ETDRS was 24 E-ETDRS letters and maximum E-ETDRS was 80 E-ETDRS letters.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single GroupChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 12 Months9.2 E-ETDRS lettersStandard Deviation 9.5
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Cube Average Thickness From Baseline at 12 Months

Mean absolute change in cube average thickness as measured by SDOCT from baseline at 12 months.

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single GroupChange in Cube Average Thickness From Baseline at 12 Months-11.9 µmStandard Deviation 27.6
p-value: 0.038t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Macular Volume From Baseline at 12 Months.

Mean absolute change from baseline in macular volume at 12 months.

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single GroupChange in Macular Volume From Baseline at 12 Months.-0.4 mm3Standard Deviation 1
p-value: 0.038t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Who Gained Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Months.

The percentage of patients who gained greater than 15 letters of vision from baseline to 12 months.

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single GroupPercentage of Patients Who Gained Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Months.7 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Who Lost Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Months

The percentage of patients who lost greater than 15 letters of vision from baseline at 12 months.

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single GroupPercentage of Patients Who Lost Greater Than 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline at 12 Months0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Were 20/200 or Worse at Month 12.

Percentage of subjects who had visual acuity of 20/200 or worse at month 12.

Time frame: month 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single GroupPercentage of Subjects Who Were 20/200 or Worse at Month 12.3 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Were 20/40 or Better at Month 12.

Percentage of subjects who had vision acuity of 20/40 or better at month 12.

Time frame: month 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single GroupPercentage of Subjects Who Were 20/40 or Better at Month 12.13 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026