Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and an Inadequate Response to Non-Biological Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

Non-interventional Local Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Current Non-biologic DMARD

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01617005
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-06-12
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2016-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This observational study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in participants with active moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs. Data will be collected from each eligible participant initiating tocilizumab treatment over 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGTocilizumab

Participants will receive tocilizumab treatment according to effective official SPC. The study protocol does not enforce treatment initiation and also does not specify any treatment regimen.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe active RA (European League Against Rheumatism \[EULAR\] criteria) * Inadequate response to DMARDs or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists * Initiating treatment with tocilizumab according to SPC

Exclusion criteria

* Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * Prior history or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous treatment with any biological drug used in the treatment of RA * Previous treatment with tocilizumab * Any contraindication to treatment with tocilizumab * Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following enrollment * Pregnant women or nursing (breastfeeding) mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 24An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs include both SAEs as well as non-serious AEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaBaseline, Week 24EULAR response was based on 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28). The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity reached (absolute DAS28 score). Good responders had a CFB greater than (\>) 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2; moderate responders had a CFB \>1.2 with a DAS28 score \>3.2 to \<= 5.1 or a change from baseline \>0.6 to \<= 1.2 with a DAS28 score \<= 5.1; non-responders had a CFB \<=0.6 or CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1. Number of participants who achieved EULAR good response and EULAR moderate response were reported.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 24
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 24

Countries

Montenegro

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RA
Moderate to severe active RA participants, receiving tocilizumab treatment according to effective official SPC, were observed. The choice of therapy was based exclusively on the medical decision of the treating physician before study enrollment. The study protocol did not enforce treatment initiation and also did not specify any treatment regimen.
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLack of motivation for treatment1
Overall StudyPregnancy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RA
Age, Continuous51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs include both SAEs as well as non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: All participants enrolled in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RANumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RANumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)AEs38 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: All participants enrolled in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RANumber of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Lack of Efficacy0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Criteria

EULAR response was based on 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28). The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity reached (absolute DAS28 score). Good responders had a CFB greater than (\>) 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2; moderate responders had a CFB \>1.2 with a DAS28 score \>3.2 to \<= 5.1 or a change from baseline \>0.6 to \<= 1.2 with a DAS28 score \<= 5.1; non-responders had a CFB \<=0.6 or CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1. Number of participants who achieved EULAR good response and EULAR moderate response were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All participants enrolled in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RANumber of Participants With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaEULAR Good Response0 participants
Tocilizumab in Moderate to Severe Active RANumber of Participants With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaEULAR Moderate Response40 participants
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: As none of the participants discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy, this outcome measure was not estimable.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026