Skip to content

Bandage Lenses in Treating Patients With Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A Single Center Phase II Study of Bandage Lenses for Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01616056
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-06-11
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Graft Versus Host Disease, Ophthalmologic Complications

Keywords

Chronic graft-versus-host disease, eye

Brief summary

This phase II clinical trial studies how well bandage lenses work in treating patients with ocular graft versus host disease. Bandage lenses may be helpful in relieving eye symptoms and damage caused by eye graft versus host disease.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the symptom improvement after 2 weeks of therapy with bandage lenses. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To confirm short-term safety within 1 month after bandage lenses. II. To determine improvement in ophthalmologic examinations after bandage lenses. III. To explore the use of optical coherence tomography as an objective measure of corneal inflammation. OUTLINE: Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions

OTHERquestionnaire administration

Ancillary studies

PROCEDUREoptical coherence tomography

Optional ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria * Ocular symptoms of NIH eye score 2 or greater: * Score 2: Moderate dry eye symptoms partially affecting activities of daily living (ADL) (requiring drops \> 3 x per day or punctal plugs), WITHOUT vision impairment * Score 3: Severe dry eye symptoms significantly affecting ADL (special eyewear to relieve pain) OR unable to work because of ocular symptoms OR loss of vision caused by keratoconjunctivitis * No new systemic immunosuppressive medications within 1 month prior to enrollment * Subject has the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Absolute neutrophil count \< 1000/ul * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to contact lenses * Evidence of any active viral, bacterial, or fungal infection in the eyes that is progressive despite appropriate treatment * Treatment with contact lenses within the previous 3 months for any indication * Active psychiatric disorder, substance abuse or any other reason that would interfere with compliance with the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale3 monthsThe 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index3 monthsOSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI3 monthsOSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale3 monthsThe 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale3 monthsLee eye subscale: sx6 dry eyes, sx7 need to use eye drops frequently, sx8 difficulty seeing clearly 0=not at all, 4=extremely bothered. If have at least one of (sx6,sx7,sx8), then sx\_eye=mean(sx6,sx7,sx8)\*25. Minimum possible score: 0 correlated with better outcome, maximum score possible: 100 correlated with worse outcome. Clinically meaningful change is half a standard deviation, which is a decrease of 11.8 of more for this scale.
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale3 months8-level change score is from 0 completely gone to 7 very much worse. Clinically meaningful improvement is defined as half a standard deviation (decreased score of 11.8 or greater).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic Evaluations2 weeksLogMAR visual acuity score of 0 is equivalent to 20/20 vision. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography2 weeksPatients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.
Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events1 monthSafety of Bandage Contact Lenses at 1 month

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bandage Contact Lenses
Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
19
Total19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBandage Contact Lenses
Age, Continuous55 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale

The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating ScaleBaseline7.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale2 weeks5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale4 weeks4.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale3 months3.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index

OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease IndexBaseline54.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index2 weeks36.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index4 weeks32.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.74
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index3 months35.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale

Lee eye subscale: sx6 dry eyes, sx7 need to use eye drops frequently, sx8 difficulty seeing clearly 0=not at all, 4=extremely bothered. If have at least one of (sx6,sx7,sx8), then sx\_eye=mean(sx6,sx7,sx8)\*25. Minimum possible score: 0 correlated with better outcome, maximum score possible: 100 correlated with worse outcome. Clinically meaningful change is half a standard deviation, which is a decrease of 11.8 of more for this scale.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye SubscaleBaseline75.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale2 weeks63.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.82
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale4 weeks61.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.52
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale3 months56.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.28
p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale

The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale4 weeks13 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale2 weeks11 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale3 months12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale

8-level change score is from 0 completely gone to 7 very much worse. Clinically meaningful improvement is defined as half a standard deviation (decreased score of 11.8 or greater).

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale2 weeks9 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale4 weeks11 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale3 months9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI

OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI2 weeks10 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI4 weeks13 Participants
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI3 months10 Participants
Secondary

Change in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic Evaluations

LogMAR visual acuity score of 0 is equivalent to 20/20 vision. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Ophthalmology assessments made after 2 weeks were not analyzed because of incomplete data collection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic EvaluationslogMAR visual acuity baseline0.26 logMARStandard Deviation 0.03
Bandage Contact LensesChange in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic EvaluationslogMAR visual acuity 2 weeks0.15 logMARStandard Deviation 0.03
p-value: 0.005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Optical Coherence Tomography

Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Optical coherence tomography results were not analyzed because of incomplete data collection.

Secondary

Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events

Safety of Bandage Contact Lenses at 1 month

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bandage Contact LensesNumber of Patients Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026