Skip to content

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of a Sub-2mm Hydrophilic MICS Intraocular Lens

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of a Sub-2mm Hydrophilic MICS Intraocular Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01615861
Enrollment
103
Registered
2012-06-11
Start date
2012-11-08
Completion date
2015-06-16
Last updated
2019-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes following sub-2 mm micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS) and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. This study is evaluated in two Phases * V4 (6M) endpoint: primary analysis * V5 (12M) and V6 (34M): EPCO score and Nd Yag incidence analysis

Interventions

Micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery (C-MICS) and IOL implantation with 1.8mm cartridge tip insertion technique.

Micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery (B-MICS) and IOL implantation with 1.4mm wound-assist insertion technique.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have clear intraocular media other than cataract in the study eye. * Subjects must have a clinically documented diagnosis of age-related cataract that is considered amenable to treatment with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract extraction in the study eye.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with ocular malformation in the study eye. * Subjects who have had previous surgery in the study eye. * Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye. * Subjects with any anterior segment pathology for which micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery would be contraindicated * Subjects using medications known to potentially complicate cataract surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity6 monthsCorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Refraction6 MonthsManifest refraction spherical equivalent. Accuracy to target refraction
Visual Acuity6 MonthsUncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Incision size6 MonthsIncision size before and after implantation
Lens decentration6 Months
Laser capsulotomy24 MonthsRemoval of post-surgical, posterior capsular opacification (PCO)
EPCO24 Months3 mm evaluation of posterior capsule opacification (EPCO) score

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026