Skip to content

Evaluation of Fusion Rate of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Using Cervios ChronOs™ and Bonion™

Evaluation of Fusion Rate of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Using Cervios ChronOs™ and Bonion™

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01615328
Enrollment
85
Registered
2012-06-08
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2014-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disk Degeneration, Intervertebral Disk Displacement, Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Keywords

anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, bone graft substitute, PEEK cage, hydroxyapatite, demineralized bone matrix, b-tricalcium phosphate, Bonion, Cervios ChronOs

Brief summary

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has shown good treatment results for a variety of cervical spine diseases such as herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD), cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). ACDF using autogenous iliac bone graft is gold standard, however, it may lead to donor-site morbidities. Preventing these complications, some authors have tried to use alterative bone graft substitutes. Among these alternatives, Cervios ChronOs™ which is the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with b-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) has become popular and shown good clinical results. However, b-TCP has only osteoconduction ability of three osteogenic properties. Recently, Bonion™ which is the PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite (HA) / demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is introduced. HA/DBM mixture has abilities of osteoconduction and osteoinduction, therefore this alternative is expected to show superior bone fusion capability to PEEK cage with b-TCP. However, there has been no comparison study between the PEEK cage with b-TCP and the PEEK cage with HA/DBM. The purpose of this study is to evaluate bone fusion rate between these cervical spine cages using postoperative computed tomography (CT)

Detailed description

Biologically, graft material should be endowed with several basic properties. Several synthetic materials and graft substitutes have been developed to maximize fusion outcomes while avoiding complications of harvesting autograft. Mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), have been widely utilized for bony regeneration. On the other hand, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been utilized as a graft substitute with mainly its osteoinductive ability. While HA and β-TCP have osteoinductive osteoconductive properties and DBM has osteoconductive osteoinductive properties, a graft material fully incorporating both properties has not been developed. We hypothesize that an interbody graft material equipped simultaneously with osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity would enhance fusion achievement; however, clinical trials with mixture materials within a PEEK cage in ACDF surgery have rarely been performed.

Interventions

The ACDF surgery will be carried out with Cervios ChronOs after randomization procedure.

DEVICEBonion

The ACDF surgery will be carried out with Bonion after randomization procedure.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of cervical HIVD, CSR, CSM or OPLL * The patient who is expected to receive anterior cervical discectomy and fusion operation. * Volunteer for this study with written consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with cervical spine fracture, infection. * Below -3.5 T-score by DEXA bone densitometry * Patient with hemorrhagic diseases * Patient with malignancy * Patient who is not suitable for this study judged by principal investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Fusion With CT(Postoperative 6 Months)6 months after surgery(ACDF)Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and cervical vertebral endplates with 3-dimensional CT at 6 months after operation (ACDF).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS of Radiating Pain (Postoperative 6 Months)at 6 months after surgery (ACDF)Evaluation of radiating pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after operation (ACDF). Reported pain using VAS was recorded and evaluated. Patients were instructed to make a mark on a horizontally-oriented, 10-point VAS labeled no pain (zero point) at the far left and greatest pain (ten point) at the far right.
VAS of Neck Pain(Postoperative 6 Months)at 6 months after surgery (ACDF)Evaluation of neck pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after operation (ACDF). Reported pain using VAS was recorded and evaluated. Patients were instructed to make a mark on a horizontally-oriented, 10-point VAS labeled no pain (zero point) at the far left and greatest pain (ten point) at the far right.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cervios ChronOS
The patients underwent ACDF using Cervios ChronOS(TM) which is the PEEK cage filled with b-TCP.
39
Bonion
The patients underwent ACDF using Bonion which is the PEEK cage with Hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix.
38
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBonionCervios ChronOSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
31 Participants33 Participants64 Participants
Age, Continuous51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
38 participants39 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants26 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 390 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Bone Fusion With CT(Postoperative 6 Months)

Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and cervical vertebral endplates with 3-dimensional CT at 6 months after operation (ACDF).

Time frame: 6 months after surgery(ACDF)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cervios ChronOSBone Fusion With CT(Postoperative 6 Months)26 participants
BonionBone Fusion With CT(Postoperative 6 Months)28 participants
Secondary

VAS of Neck Pain(Postoperative 6 Months)

Evaluation of neck pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after operation (ACDF). Reported pain using VAS was recorded and evaluated. Patients were instructed to make a mark on a horizontally-oriented, 10-point VAS labeled no pain (zero point) at the far left and greatest pain (ten point) at the far right.

Time frame: at 6 months after surgery (ACDF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervios ChronOSVAS of Neck Pain(Postoperative 6 Months)2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
BonionVAS of Neck Pain(Postoperative 6 Months)2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

VAS of Radiating Pain (Postoperative 6 Months)

Evaluation of radiating pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after operation (ACDF). Reported pain using VAS was recorded and evaluated. Patients were instructed to make a mark on a horizontally-oriented, 10-point VAS labeled no pain (zero point) at the far left and greatest pain (ten point) at the far right.

Time frame: at 6 months after surgery (ACDF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervios ChronOSVAS of Radiating Pain (Postoperative 6 Months)2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
BonionVAS of Radiating Pain (Postoperative 6 Months)2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026