Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, amisulpride, sulpiride, antipsychotic combination
Brief summary
Background: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d).The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost.
Detailed description
Background: Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. It has been reported that mean doses of low-potency typical antipsychotics less than 600 mg/day of chlorpromazine equivalent dose has no higher risk of EPS than atypical antipsychotics. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnosis) are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d). The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost. The efficacy assessment was the change from baseline in the score on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and subscales (positive scale, negative scale, general psychopathology scale), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Safety assessments include the change from baseline on Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and UKU Side-effects Rating Scale (UKU), and the change from baseline in prolactin levels, body weight, vital sign, blood pressure, AC glucose level, and lipid profiles(cholesterol, high density lipid protein \[HDL\], low density lipid protein \[LDL\], and triglyceride \[TG\]).
Interventions
DRUGfull-dose amisulpride
amisulpride 800mg/d
Sponsors
Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* schizophrenia * CGI \>=4 * washout of antipsychotics at least 3-5 days * written informed consents
Exclusion criteria
* History of serious adverse events to sulpiride or amisulpride * History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or tardive dyskinesia to antipsychotics * treatment-resistant schizophrenia * long-acting antipsychotics in the past 3 months * comorbid with substance abuse/dependence * female subjects with pregnancy * severe physical illness
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores | The PANSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| changes from baseline in the scores on several psychopathology scales for efficacy | The CGI-S, PANSS, CDSS, and GAF were rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination). | psychopathology scales for efficacy include: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), PANSS positive scale, PANSS negative scale, PANSS general psychopathology scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) |
| Assessments of safety for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) | AIMS, BAS, and SAS were administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination) | The severity of EPS was assessed by the following neurological scales: the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS) |
| Assessments of safety for general adverse events | UKU was administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination) | General adverse events were evaluated by a standardized the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale. A score of 1, 2 or 3 on any UKU item that first occurred or worsened during treatment indicated adverse events cases. |
| Other safety of clinical trial | Body weight, BMI, pulse rate, and blood pressure were checked at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination). ECG and laboratory tests were assessed at baseline and week 6. | Body weights, body mass index (BMI), pulse rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for QTc intervals (Bazett's correction of QT interval), and laboratory tests were performed to determine safety. Laboratory tests included fasting glucose, liver function (alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] and aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\]), renal function (blood urea nitrogen \[BUN\], creatinine), lipid profiles (triglycerides, cholesterol, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\], and low density lipoprotein \[LDL\]), and prolactin level. |
| Assessments of quality of life | Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 was assessed at baseline and week 6 | The SF-36, with two primary-factor analytic components: the physical component summary and the mental component summary, was used to measure quality of life. |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed