Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Periodontal Surgery in Supra-alveolar-type Defects With or Without Straumann® Emdogain

A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating the Outcomes of Periodontal Surgery in Supra-alveolar-type Defects With or Without Straumann® Emdogain

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01614925
Enrollment
35
Registered
2012-06-08
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2020-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Diseases

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that in supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominately horizontal pattern of bone loss), periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain will result in significantly higher Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain compared to periodontal surgery without Straumann® Emdogain.

Detailed description

The following secondary endpoints will be evaluated during the study: * Change in Gingival Margin (GM) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Comparison of early wound healing index (EHI) at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups * Comparison of post-surgical pain at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups * Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in root dentin hypersensitivity at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in full mouth plaque index (PI) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

Interventions

DEVICEEmdogain

Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain

Periodontal surgery alone

Sponsors

Institut Straumann AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have advanced periodontitis: * presence of supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominantly horizontal pattern of bone loss) at a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of 7 adjacent teeth (FDI positions 17-27 or 37-47) in either the maxilla or the mandible with a PPD of ≥6 mm at a minimum on one site of the examined teeth * Teeth must have \< Class II mobility * Teeth must have horizontal bone loss with an intrabony component of \<2 mm as defined by radiographic evaluation * Subjects must have adequate oral hygiene (full mouth plaque index (PI) of \<25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy) * Subjects must have adequate control of inflammation (full mouth bleeding on probing (FMBP) of \<25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy) * Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related procedures * Subjects must be males and females of at least 18 years of age * Subjects must be committed to the study and the required follow-up visits * Subjects must be in good general health as assessed by the investigator at time of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Pre-surgical

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Attachment Level12 MonthsThe change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) from Baseline to 12 Months. CAL measurements will be derived from the Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Gingival Margin (GM) measurements as follows: CAL = PPD - GM.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baselinePPD was measured before the area is anaesthetized by recording the distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the probable pocket at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesiooral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth.Negative value for PPD indicates reduction of pocket depth.
Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline4 weeks after baselinePostoperative wound healing was assessed by the EHI according to Wachtel et al. \[2003\] by visual assessment: 1. complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area 2. complete flap closure - fine fibrin line in the interproximal area 3. complete flap closure - fibrin clot in the interproximal area 4. incomplete flap closure - partial necrosis of the interproximal tissue 5. incomplete flap closure - complete necrosis of the interproximal tissue The outcome measure was the percentage of EHI category 1 (complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area)
Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline4 weeks after baselineVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for post-surgical pain, minimum value=0, maximum value=10, higher score means worse outcome
Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baselineGM was measured by recording the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the margin of the gingiva at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, disto-oral) on the study teeth. Negative value for GM indicates gingival recession. A positive value for the GM indicates the gingiva was covering the CEJ.
Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baselineRDH was examined by physical testing using cold air as a stimulus. The percentage of positive events per total testing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in RDH.
Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baselineThe PI was recorded according to O'Leary et al. \[1972\] as a binary response at the mesial, distal, facial and lingual surfaces on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in PI.
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baselineThe presence of BoP was recorded as a binary response on 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, midvestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total probing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in BoP.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment was terminated prematurely.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Emdogain
Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain Emdogain: Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain
18
Periodontal Surgery
Periodontal surgery alone Periodontal surgery: Periodontal surgery alone
17
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEmdogainPeriodontal SurgeryTotal
Age, Continuous50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Region of Enrollment
Germany
10 participants7 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants7 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants14 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants3 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 181 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Attachment Level

The change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) from Baseline to 12 Months. CAL measurements will be derived from the Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Gingival Margin (GM) measurements as follows: CAL = PPD - GM.

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EmdogainClinical Attachment Level-2.91 mmStandard Deviation 1.3
Periodontal SurgeryClinical Attachment Level-2.08 mmStandard Deviation 1.32
Secondary

Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months

The presence of BoP was recorded as a binary response on 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, midvestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total probing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in BoP.

Time frame: 12 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EmdogainChange in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months-36 percentage of BoP change
Periodontal SurgeryChange in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months-13 percentage of BoP change
Secondary

Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months

GM was measured by recording the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the margin of the gingiva at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, disto-oral) on the study teeth. Negative value for GM indicates gingival recession. A positive value for the GM indicates the gingiva was covering the CEJ.

Time frame: 12 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EmdogainChange in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months-0.36 mmStandard Deviation 0.84
Periodontal SurgeryChange in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months-0.27 mmStandard Deviation 1.53
Secondary

Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months

The PI was recorded according to O'Leary et al. \[1972\] as a binary response at the mesial, distal, facial and lingual surfaces on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in PI.

Time frame: 12 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EmdogainChange in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months14.7 percentage of PI change
Periodontal SurgeryChange in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months13.4 percentage of PI change
Secondary

Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months

PPD was measured before the area is anaesthetized by recording the distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the probable pocket at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesiooral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth.Negative value for PPD indicates reduction of pocket depth.

Time frame: 12 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EmdogainChange in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months-2.93 mmStandard Deviation 1.44
Periodontal SurgeryChange in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months-2.47 mmStandard Deviation 1.12
Secondary

Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months

RDH was examined by physical testing using cold air as a stimulus. The percentage of positive events per total testing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in RDH.

Time frame: 12 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EmdogainChange in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months-21.4 percentage of RDH change
Periodontal SurgeryChange in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months-26.7 percentage of RDH change
Secondary

Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for post-surgical pain, minimum value=0, maximum value=10, higher score means worse outcome

Time frame: 4 weeks after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EmdogainComparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
Periodontal SurgeryComparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline3.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
Secondary

Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline

Postoperative wound healing was assessed by the EHI according to Wachtel et al. \[2003\] by visual assessment: 1. complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area 2. complete flap closure - fine fibrin line in the interproximal area 3. complete flap closure - fibrin clot in the interproximal area 4. incomplete flap closure - partial necrosis of the interproximal tissue 5. incomplete flap closure - complete necrosis of the interproximal tissue The outcome measure was the percentage of EHI category 1 (complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area)

Time frame: 4 weeks after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EmdogainEarly Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline93 percentage of EHI category 1
Periodontal SurgeryEarly Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline100 percentage of EHI category 1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026