Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Diseases
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that in supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominately horizontal pattern of bone loss), periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain will result in significantly higher Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain compared to periodontal surgery without Straumann® Emdogain.
Detailed description
The following secondary endpoints will be evaluated during the study: * Change in Gingival Margin (GM) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Comparison of early wound healing index (EHI) at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups * Comparison of post-surgical pain at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups * Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in root dentin hypersensitivity at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline * Change in full mouth plaque index (PI) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline
Interventions
Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain
Periodontal surgery alone
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must have advanced periodontitis: * presence of supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominantly horizontal pattern of bone loss) at a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of 7 adjacent teeth (FDI positions 17-27 or 37-47) in either the maxilla or the mandible with a PPD of ≥6 mm at a minimum on one site of the examined teeth * Teeth must have \< Class II mobility * Teeth must have horizontal bone loss with an intrabony component of \<2 mm as defined by radiographic evaluation * Subjects must have adequate oral hygiene (full mouth plaque index (PI) of \<25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy) * Subjects must have adequate control of inflammation (full mouth bleeding on probing (FMBP) of \<25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy) * Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related procedures * Subjects must be males and females of at least 18 years of age * Subjects must be committed to the study and the required follow-up visits * Subjects must be in good general health as assessed by the investigator at time of surgery
Exclusion criteria
Pre-surgical
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Attachment Level | 12 Months | The change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) from Baseline to 12 Months. CAL measurements will be derived from the Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Gingival Margin (GM) measurements as follows: CAL = PPD - GM. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months | 12 months after baseline | PPD was measured before the area is anaesthetized by recording the distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the probable pocket at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesiooral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth.Negative value for PPD indicates reduction of pocket depth. |
| Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 4 weeks after baseline | Postoperative wound healing was assessed by the EHI according to Wachtel et al. \[2003\] by visual assessment: 1. complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area 2. complete flap closure - fine fibrin line in the interproximal area 3. complete flap closure - fibrin clot in the interproximal area 4. incomplete flap closure - partial necrosis of the interproximal tissue 5. incomplete flap closure - complete necrosis of the interproximal tissue The outcome measure was the percentage of EHI category 1 (complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area) |
| Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 4 weeks after baseline | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for post-surgical pain, minimum value=0, maximum value=10, higher score means worse outcome |
| Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months | 12 months after baseline | GM was measured by recording the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the margin of the gingiva at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, disto-oral) on the study teeth. Negative value for GM indicates gingival recession. A positive value for the GM indicates the gingiva was covering the CEJ. |
| Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months | 12 months after baseline | RDH was examined by physical testing using cold air as a stimulus. The percentage of positive events per total testing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in RDH. |
| Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months | 12 months after baseline | The PI was recorded according to O'Leary et al. \[1972\] as a binary response at the mesial, distal, facial and lingual surfaces on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in PI. |
| Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months | 12 months after baseline | The presence of BoP was recorded as a binary response on 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, midvestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total probing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in BoP. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The recruitment was terminated prematurely.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Emdogain Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain
Emdogain: Periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain | 18 |
| Periodontal Surgery Periodontal surgery alone
Periodontal surgery: Periodontal surgery alone | 17 |
| Total | 35 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 3 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Emdogain | Periodontal Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | 53.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 52.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 10 participants | 7 participants | 17 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 3 participants | 3 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 5 participants | 7 participants | 12 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 14 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 13 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 18 | 1 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 17 |
Outcome results
Clinical Attachment Level
The change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) from Baseline to 12 Months. CAL measurements will be derived from the Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Gingival Margin (GM) measurements as follows: CAL = PPD - GM.
Time frame: 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Clinical Attachment Level | -2.91 mm | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Periodontal Surgery | Clinical Attachment Level | -2.08 mm | Standard Deviation 1.32 |
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months
The presence of BoP was recorded as a binary response on 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, midvestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total probing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in BoP.
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months | -36 percentage of BoP change |
| Periodontal Surgery | Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months | -13 percentage of BoP change |
Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months
GM was measured by recording the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the margin of the gingiva at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, disto-oral) on the study teeth. Negative value for GM indicates gingival recession. A positive value for the GM indicates the gingiva was covering the CEJ.
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months | -0.36 mm | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Periodontal Surgery | Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months | -0.27 mm | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months
The PI was recorded according to O'Leary et al. \[1972\] as a binary response at the mesial, distal, facial and lingual surfaces on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in PI.
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months | 14.7 percentage of PI change |
| Periodontal Surgery | Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months | 13.4 percentage of PI change |
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months
PPD was measured before the area is anaesthetized by recording the distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the probable pocket at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesiooral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth.Negative value for PPD indicates reduction of pocket depth.
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months | -2.93 mm | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Periodontal Surgery | Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months | -2.47 mm | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months
RDH was examined by physical testing using cold air as a stimulus. The percentage of positive events per total testing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in RDH.
Time frame: 12 months after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months | -21.4 percentage of RDH change |
| Periodontal Surgery | Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months | -26.7 percentage of RDH change |
Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for post-surgical pain, minimum value=0, maximum value=10, higher score means worse outcome
Time frame: 4 weeks after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 3.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.39 |
| Periodontal Surgery | Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 3.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.77 |
Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline
Postoperative wound healing was assessed by the EHI according to Wachtel et al. \[2003\] by visual assessment: 1. complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area 2. complete flap closure - fine fibrin line in the interproximal area 3. complete flap closure - fibrin clot in the interproximal area 4. incomplete flap closure - partial necrosis of the interproximal tissue 5. incomplete flap closure - complete necrosis of the interproximal tissue The outcome measure was the percentage of EHI category 1 (complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area)
Time frame: 4 weeks after baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Emdogain | Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 93 percentage of EHI category 1 |
| Periodontal Surgery | Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline | 100 percentage of EHI category 1 |