Skip to content

A Double-Blinded, Randomized Placebo Controlled Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA Versus Saline Injections to the Cheek Region in Patients With Rosacea

A Double-Blinded, Randomized Placebo Controlled Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA Versus Saline Injections to the Cheek Region in Patients With Rosacea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01614743
Enrollment
9
Registered
2012-06-08
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2020-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rosacea

Keywords

Rosacea

Brief summary

This is a double-blinded, randomized placebo controlled pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA versus saline injections to the cheek region in patients with rosacea. The pilot study will enroll and treat a total of 10 subjects who present with rosacea of the cheek area. Upon study entry, subjects will be randomized to receive treatment with incobotulinumtoxinA or bacteriostatic saline to the cheek area. Study treatment will be prepared by an unblinded designee and both Physician Investigator (PI) and subject will remain blinded for the duration of the study. At the 16 week visit, control subjects will enter the rescue arm portion of the study and all study subjects will receive treatment with incobotulinumtoxinA to the cheek areas.

Interventions

Experimental injection given at baseline and Week 16

Placebo at baseline, incobotulinumtoxinA at 16 weeks

Sponsors

Merz North America, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
DeNova Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females between 18 and 65 years of age. 2. Subjects presenting with rosacea in the cheek area. 3. Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study. 4. Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at Visit 1 and be willing able to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., barrier methods used with a spermicidal agent, hormonal methods, IUD, surgical sterilization, abstinence) during the study. Women will not be considered of childbearing potential if one of the following is documented on the medical history: * postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study drug administration * without a uterus and/or both ovaries * has had a bilateral tubal ligation for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration. * absence of an other physical condition according to the PI's discretion 5. Willingness and ability to provide written photo consent and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup). 6. Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent prior to performance of any study related procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who are pregnant, nursing, planning to become pregnant, and/or not using a reliable form of birth control. 2. Subjects with a known allergy or sensitivity to any component of the study medications or anesthesia. 3. Topical or oral rosacea treatments within the past 2 weeks. 4. Subjects with a significant systemic illness or illness localized to the areas of treatment. 5. Botulinum toxin to the face within the past 6 months. 6. Significant concurrent illness such as diabetes, epilepsy, lupus, or congestive heart failure. 7. Concurrent skin condition affecting area to be treated. 8. Prior surgery on the area to be treated within 3 months of initial treatment or during the study. 9. History or evidence of keloids or hypertrophic scarring. 10. Subjects currently using aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents or other agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function. 11. Subjects with a diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis, Eaton-Lambert Syndrome, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or any other disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function or current facial palsy. 12. Current history of chronic drug or alcohol abuse. 13. Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study medication. 14. Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, non¬compliance with medical treatment or unreliability. 15. Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Cardbaseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeksLive rosacea assessment for each side of the face using the Rosacea Clinical Scorecard for clinical assessment.The Rosacea Clinical Scorecard assesses the primary signs and symptoms of rosacea and is graded as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2) or severe (3).
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Eventsbaseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeksRate of adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 Weeksbaseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeksSelf-esteem change will be determined by patient self-evaluation using the Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale. Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale includes three facets of self-esteem: Appearance, Performance, and Social The scale has a range of 20-100. A score closer to 100 signifies higher self-esteem, while a score closer to 20 signifies lower seld-esteem.
Patient Satisfactionweek 1, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeks4-point categorical assessment of patient satisfaction with treatment. 1. Highly Satisfied- Optimal cosmetic result 2. Very Satisfied- Obvious improvement in appearance form the initial condition, but not completely optimal for this subject 3. Satisfied- Marked improvement in appearance from initial condition 4. Unsatisfied- The appearance is essentially the same or worse as the original condition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinA
Experimental injection given at baseline and Week 16
4
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic Saline
Placebo at baseline, incobotulinumtoxinA at 16 weeks
5
Total9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAGroup 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous42 Years53 Years47 Years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

Rate of adverse events

Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinANumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events0 participants
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events0 participants
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card

Live rosacea assessment for each side of the face using the Rosacea Clinical Scorecard for clinical assessment.The Rosacea Clinical Scorecard assesses the primary signs and symptoms of rosacea and is graded as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2) or severe (3).

Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 4-0.65 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.6
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 16-0.67 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.48
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 1-0.63 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.49
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 17-0.83 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.62
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 12-0.80 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.61
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 20-1.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.85
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 12-0.13 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.13
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 1-0.00063 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.23
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 4-0.34 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.21
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 20-0.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.53
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 16-0.51 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.34
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePercent Change From Baseline in the Rosacea Clinical Score Card% Diff from baseline, Week 17-0.83 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.64
Secondary

Mean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 Weeks

Self-esteem change will be determined by patient self-evaluation using the Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale. Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale includes three facets of self-esteem: Appearance, Performance, and Social The scale has a range of 20-100. A score closer to 100 signifies higher self-esteem, while a score closer to 20 signifies lower seld-esteem.

Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 453.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1650.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 153.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1752.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1252.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 2051.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksBaseline50.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.19
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 2034.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksBaseline35.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 136.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.35
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 434.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1232.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.16
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1634.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalineMean Heatherton & Polivy State Self-Esteem (HPSS) Scale Score at Baseline, 1, 4, 12, 16, 17, and 20 WeeksWeek 1733.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

4-point categorical assessment of patient satisfaction with treatment. 1. Highly Satisfied- Optimal cosmetic result 2. Very Satisfied- Obvious improvement in appearance form the initial condition, but not completely optimal for this subject 3. Satisfied- Marked improvement in appearance from initial condition 4. Unsatisfied- The appearance is essentially the same or worse as the original condition.

Time frame: week 1, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 17 weeks and 20 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 13.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 42.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 123.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 162.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 172.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Group 1 - IncobotulinumtoxinAPatient SatisfactionWeek 201.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 172.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 13.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 163.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 43.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 202.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Group 2 - Bacteriostatic SalinePatient SatisfactionWeek 123.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026