Skip to content

Do Patients With Early Post Operative Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Have a Genetic Predisposition?

Do Patients With Early Post Operative Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Have a Genetic Predisposition?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01614587
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-06-08
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse, recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse, genetic predisposition, SNP microarray analysis, pelvic floor, genetic factors, adequate prolapse repair, polymorphisms, surgical failure, reoperation, DNA, buccal swabs, TaqMan SNP allelic discriminiation assays, duplex real-time PCR, genome-wide SNP microarrays, next-generation sequencing

Brief summary

The objective is to explore the genetic predisposition to early pelvic organ prolapse after adequate surgical repair by exploring the association between pelvic organ prolapse recurrences and certain polymorphisms.

Detailed description

Pelvic organ prolapse develops as a result of a loss of support provided by the muscles and fascia that constitute the pelvic floor. Several recent population studies have estimated the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse at between 10% and 30%. One in nine women will undergo surgery for these disorders in her lifetime and of these, one third will undergo repeated surgeries. The correction of pelvic organ protrusion is aimed at restoring the pelvic floor functional status and ultimately improving the patients quality of life. There are a few studies that have explored the genetic predisposition to developing pelvic organ prolapse but none so far looks at genetic factors involved in prolapse recurrence after adequate prolapse repair. There are two groups of women: women who underwent adequate repair of their prolapse and had an unexplained early recurrence. And a second control group of women who underwent the same prolapse repair procedure and had no further prolapse recurrence.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey
CollaboratorOTHER
Atlantic Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cases: early, unexplained recurrence (within 6 months of procedure) after sacrocolpopexy), the recurrence required treatment (surgery or pessary) Controls: sacrocolpopexy during the same period, no recurrence, no reoperation, no retreatment to date (minimum of 12 months from surgery)

Exclusion criteria

* Obvious surgical technical failure * Use of other graft material than polypropylene mesh * Planned two staged operation * Contraindications to surgery based on existing medical conditions * Pregnancy * Desire for pregnancy in the future

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNP microarray analysis from recurrent prolapse subjects and controls12 months post-operative, DNA will be collectedDNA will be evaluated by a variety of methods. For example, candidate polymorphisms may be evaluated using TaqMan SNP allelic discrimination assays which are based upon duplex real-time PCR. In addition, genome-wide SNP microarrays may be employed in order to perform a whole genome association study. Additional analysis such as DNA resequencing may also be required in order to identify causative polymorphisms linked to the newly associated SNPs. Other methods of DNA analysis such as next-generation sequencing may also be warranted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare all peri-operative characteristics and demographics between groups12 months post-operativePerioperative data will include: age, date of surgery, repeat procedure or treatment, procedure and mesh used, mesh related complications, early post-operative complications. Descriptive statistics will be derived for the entire group. The two subgroups (case and control) will then be compared using: Student t test, Fisher exact test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous, nonparametric categorical and nonparametric ordinal variables, respectively.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026