Skip to content

Total Hip Prosthesis Assisted by Computer

Total Hip Prosthesis Assisted by Computer Based on Pre-operative EOS Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01613989
Acronym
NAVEOS
Enrollment
78
Registered
2012-06-07
Start date
2012-04-12
Completion date
2014-11-06
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinic Hip Osteoarthrosis

Keywords

Hip arthroplasty, navigation

Brief summary

Computer assistance in prosthetic hip surgery is able to improve the accuracy of the surgery: Associating hip navigation and EOSTM imaging pre-operatively could simplify the procedure of hip navigation in lateral decubitus while maintaining the accuracy of the technique

Detailed description

Hip navigation based on preoperative EOS(TM) imaging could help to improve the accuracy of cup positioning like other computer assisted hip surgery, but it would also simplify the procedure in lateral decubitus. Indeed, the registration of the controlateral antero superior iliac spine and the pubis is not necessary with this technique. The target population of the study is the one affected with primitive hip osteoarthritis for which an indication of prosthesis of total hip has been chosen Expected Result: Simplification of the procedure of navigation of the cup. Decrease in the number of cups positioned out of the "security zone" compared to the standard manual technique of cup positioning. A result of 50% of good positioning is expected with the manual technique versus 80% with the technique of navigation based on EOS(TM). MAIN OBJECTIVE: Compare the surgical treatment of total hip prosthesis without assistance by computer and total hip prosthesis with navigation based on imaging EOSTM pre-operative Comparative clinical trial of superiority, randomized in single blind, in 2 parallel groups: -Group 1: Installation of hip prosthesis without assistance by computer -Group 2: Installation of hip prosthesis with assistance by computer based on imaging EOS(TM)

Interventions

PROCEDUREProsthetic hip surgery, operated under manual control

: Hip replacement is performed in supine side position. Cup is positioned under manual control with the aid of a manual ancillary.

PROCEDUREProsthetic hip surgery operated under navigation based on EOS imaging

The patient will be installed in supine side position. The cup will be navigated with the technique based on EOS imaging. This technique requires the registration of the homolateral antero superior iliac spine and the homolateral postero superior iliac spine only. It does not require the registration of the pubis or any other controlateral points which are poorly accessible in the supine side position

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Nosologic criteria : * Primitive clinic hip osteoarthrosis * secondary secondary clinic hip osteoarthrosis : osteonecrosis of femoral head posttraumatic * Primitive radiological hip osteoarthrosis, * Indication of total hip prosthesis * Free informed and written consent, dated and signed by the patient and the investigator before any examination required by the research * Subject affiliated or beneficiary of the social security * Man or woman aged from 40 to 90 years

Exclusion criteria

* The navigation based on EOSTM imaging. requires the visualization on the EOSTM. pre-operative radiography of 6 radiological bone markers. The non-viewing of these markers is a criterion for exclusion of the study. * anaesthetic contraindication * pregnant women * Persons under the control of justice

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Positioning of the cup in the 'security zone'. Comparison performed in immediate post-operativeThe measure of the positioning of the cup will be carried out on the control scanner post-operatively at 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average surgical Timeat inclusion
Post-operative dislocationat 1 year of the occurrence of at least 1 episode of dislocation post-operativelypropotion of Post-operative dislocation : Comparison at 1 year of the occurrence of at least 1 episode of dislocation post-operatively
Functional Score of Harris and the score PMAat 3 month,6 month, and 12 monthsmean of Functional Score of Harris and the score PMA
Quality of live scoreat 3 month,6 month,and 12 months. Quality of live score: Womac score, SF12,Oxford Score: comparison at 3 month,6 month,one year Measure : expressed as a mean
Early sign of radiographic unsealingcomparison at one yearEarly sign of radiographic unsealing : comparison at one year 2 blinded operators Measure : expressed as a mean

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnselme BILLAUD

University Hospital Bordeaux, France

STUDY_CHAIRAnntoine BENARD

University Hospital Bordeaux, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026