Skip to content

Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With or Without Pelvic Drain Placement in Reducing Adverse Events After Surgery in Patients With Prostate Cancer

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Pelvic Drain Placement Versus no Pelvic Drain Placement After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01613651
Enrollment
191
Registered
2012-06-07
Start date
2012-08-24
Completion date
2017-09-11
Last updated
2017-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial studies robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with pelvic drain placement to see how well it works compared to RALP without pelvic drain replacement in reducing adverse events after surgery in patients with prostate cancer.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if eliminating placement of a pelvic drain in patients during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) increases incidence of early postoperative adverse events occurring within 90 days from prostatectomy, compared to patients who have a pelvic drain placed during RALP. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without a pelvic drain when adjustments to confounders associated with these events are made (confounders: demographic, surgical and pathologic; age, body mass index \[BMI\], pathologic stage, Gleason sum, extent of lymph node dissection). II. To report peri-operative and postoperative outcomes, including but not limited to, length of hospital stay, re-admissions, continence, potency and incidence of medical interventions for patients with and without pelvic drain. III. To compare early postoperative adverse event rates between patients with and without a pelvic drain in patients who had extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo RALP. ARM II: Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain. After completion of treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week and then 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERquestionnaire administration

Ancillary studies

Undergo placement of pelvic drain

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
City of Hope Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and scheduled to undergo RALP at City of Hope National Medical Center * Written informed consent obtained in accordance with institutional policies approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services * Patients with prior transurethral resection and other prostate procedures are eligible with the exception of the procedures indicated in the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of early postoperative adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0)Within 90 days from prostatectomyThe observed rate of adverse events among patients on the two arms of the study will be compared using a one-sided non-inferiority test with the intent to rule out a 10% or greater difference in postoperative adverse event rates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without pelvic drain with adjustments applied to confounders associated with these events according to CTCAE 4.0Within 90 days post prostatectomyFurther analysis will be conducted using multivariate logistic regression, to determine whether the odds of early postoperative adverse events are significantly different for patients in different study arms, once they have controlled for confounding prognostic factors, such as age, BMI, pathologic stage, Gleason sum, and lymph node dissection template. Secondary postoperative categorical or continuous endpoints will be examined between arm I and arm II and will be analyzed using the Chi Square T-test, the Mann Whitney test, or the two-sided t-test.
Peri-operative outcomes for patients with and without a pelvic drain, including continence and potencyUp to 12 monthsSurvival analysis will be used to determine if there is any significant difference between patients on two arms of the study with respect to time to continence or potency. Secondary postoperative categorical or continuous endpoints will be examined between arm I and arm II and will be analyzed using the Chi Square T-test, the Mann Whitney test, or the two-sided t-test.
Incidence of early postoperative adverse events from prostatectomy in patients with and without a pelvic drain who had an extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP according to CTCAE 4.0Within 90 days from prostatectomySecondary postoperative categorical or continuous endpoints will be examined between arm I and arm II and will be analyzed using the Chi Square T-test, the Mann Whitney test, or the two-sided t-test.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026