Skip to content

Body Awareness Therapy for People With Stroke

Body Awareness Therapy for People With Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01613339
Enrollment
46
Registered
2012-06-07
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2018-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

stroke, postural control, body awareness therapy

Brief summary

Affected balance capacity is common after a stroke due to paresis and sensory disturbances. The affected balance capacity may cause walking disturbances, falls and decreased mobility. Balance may be improved by physical therapy. A possible method for balance training is body awareness therapy, that was introduced in Sweden by Jacques Dropsy and Gertrud Roxendal. Earlier body awareness therapy was mostly used in psychiatric care but in the recent years the method has been used for people with long-tern pain, amputations and multiple sclerosis. Body awareness therapy includes exercises in lying, sitting and standing. Focus of the exercises are awareness of one´s movement behaviour, breathing patterns, resources and limitations. Postural control is an essential part in the exercises. Body awareness therapy could be used for people with stroke as a way to improve postural control. The aim of this study is to investigate if balance training using body awareness therapy can improve balance and walking in people after stroke. The interventions consists of body awareness therapy once a week for 8 weeks.

Interventions

OTHERBalance training using Body awareness therapy

Once a week, 1 hour for 8 weeks.Body awareness training may be performed by physiotherapist. Exercises are performed in standing, sitting and lying. Example of exercises are weight-balancing in standing and relaxation exercises.

Sponsors

Norrbacka-Eugenia Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Örebro County Council
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed stroke more than 6 months ago. Walking capacity of 100 meter with or without assistive device.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical or cognitive impairment that prohibits participating in the intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bergs Balance ScaleChange from baseline in Bergs balance scale at 9 weeksTest of functional balance. Includes 14 items all graded 0-4 where 0 indicate larger impairment. Total score is used here, maximum 56 and minimum 0. The Berg balance scale was developed for older patients but is a much used meausure of dynamic and static functional balance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Up and Go TestChange from baseline in Timed Up and Go test at 9 weekstest of functional mobility. Time is taken in seconds. The participants sits on a chair with armrests are then asked to rise, walk 3 meters, turn and walk back and sit down.
Activities-specific Balance Confidence ScaleChange from baseline in Activities-specific Balance confidence scale at 9 weeks16 item questionnaire that investigates balance self-efficacy. Each items is a question; How secure are you that you will not fall when you...sweep the floor? The participant are asked to grade his/hers feeling of secutiry from 0, 10, 20 and so on up to 100. 0 is regarded low balance self-efficacy. The item responses are summed and divided by 16.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data collection was performed in the following order due to practical reason at four primary health care centres in Örebro county council; Kumla Primary health care center, October 2011- January 2012, Karla Primary health care centre, March 2012-June 2012, Nora and Brickegården Primary health care centre September 2012 to December 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Body Awareness Therapy
Balance training using Body awareness therapy : Once a week, 1 hour for 8 weeks.Body awareness training may be performed by physiotherapist. Exercises are performed in standing, sitting and lying. Exemple of exercies are weight-balancing in standing and relaxation exercises.
24
Control
No specific treatment.
22
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlBody Awareness TherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
22 participants24 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Bergs Balance Scale

Test of functional balance. Includes 14 items all graded 0-4 where 0 indicate larger impairment. Total score is used here, maximum 56 and minimum 0. The Berg balance scale was developed for older patients but is a much used meausure of dynamic and static functional balance.

Time frame: Change from baseline in Bergs balance scale at 9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Body Awareness TherapyBergs Balance Scale52.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
ControlBergs Balance Scale47.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale

16 item questionnaire that investigates balance self-efficacy. Each items is a question; How secure are you that you will not fall when you...sweep the floor? The participant are asked to grade his/hers feeling of secutiry from 0, 10, 20 and so on up to 100. 0 is regarded low balance self-efficacy. The item responses are summed and divided by 16.

Time frame: Change from baseline in Activities-specific Balance confidence scale at 9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Body Awareness TherapyActivities-specific Balance Confidence Scale68.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
ControlActivities-specific Balance Confidence Scale59.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Timed Up and Go Test

test of functional mobility. Time is taken in seconds. The participants sits on a chair with armrests are then asked to rise, walk 3 meters, turn and walk back and sit down.

Time frame: Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go test at 9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Body Awareness TherapyTimed Up and Go Test13.7 secondsStandard Deviation 7.3
ControlTimed Up and Go Test17.6 secondsStandard Deviation 9.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026