Skip to content

Surgery or Chemotherapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SOC 1 Trial)?

Evaluation of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01611766
Enrollment
356
Registered
2012-06-05
Start date
2012-07-19
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Epithelial Cancer Recurrent, Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Keywords

secondary cytoreductive surgery, Ovarian Cancer, surgery, recurrence

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of secondary cytoreduction (SCR) and validate the risk model of patient selection criteria in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Detailed description

The primary objective is to determine whether secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Interventions

Complete Cytoreduction

6 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy

Sponsors

Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at recurrence ≥ 18 years * Patients with platinum-sensitive, first relapsed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC, PPC, FTC), which is defined as those with treatment -free interval of 6 months or more. * A complete secondary cytoreduction predicting score, iMODEL \[Tian WJ, Ann Surg Oncol 2012,19(2):597-604\]\<=4.7, including FIGO stage (0 or 0.8); residual disease after primary surgery (0 or 1.5); Progression-free interval (0 or 2.4); PS ECOG (0 or 2.4); Ca125 (0 or 1.8); and ascites at recurrence (0 or 3.0). If PI and CO-PI reach consensus that the recurrent tumor detected by PET/CT could be completely resected, the index of CA125 could be scored as 0. (Revised on 09/30/2013) * Assessed by the experienced surgeons, complete resection of all recurrent disease is possible. If single lesion outside the peritoneal cavity can be resected, MRI/CT or PET/CT scan should be performed to exclude simultaneous intra-abdominal lesions. * Patients who have given their signed and written informed consent and their consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with borderline tumors as well as non-epithelial tumors. * Patients for interval-debulking, or for second-look surgery, or palliative surgery planned. * Impossible to assess the resectability or evaluate the score. Radiological signs suggesting complete resection is impossible. * More than one prior chemotherapy. * Second relapse or more * Patients with second or other malignancies who have been treated by surgery, if the treatment might interfere with the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer or if major impact on prognosis is expected. * Progression during chemotherapy or recurrence within 6 months after first-line therapy * Any contradiction not allowing surgery and/or chemotherapy 1. Accompanied by hypoxia serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2. Uncontrolled hypertension, cerebrovascular accident/ Stroke, myocardial infarct, unstable angina, untreated thrombosis, chronic congestive heart failure, or serious arrhythmia in need of medicine. 3. Severe hepatitis, history of liver disease, nephrotic syndrome, renal insufficiency 4. Active ulcer history, abdominal wall fistula, perforation of gastrointestinal tract, or Intra-abdominal abscess, or simultaneously apply treatment/prevent ulcers therapy. 5. Uncontrolled diabetes 6. Uncontrolled epilepsy need long-term antiepileptic treatment. * Any medication induced considerable risk of surgery, e.g. estimated bleeding due to oral anticoagulating agents, or bevacizumab.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalUp to 60 months after last patient randomizedfrom date of randomisation until death
Progression-free survivalUp to 24 months after last patient randomizedinterval between date of randomization and the date of second relapse/ progression or death, whatever occurs first

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accumulating Treatment-free survival (TFSa)Up to 60 months after last patient randomizedthe time of OS minus each treatment period after randomization, including surgery and chemotherapy
Overall survival after the adjustment of one-way treatment switchingUp to 60 months after last patient randomizedOS adjusted by statistical models for crossover
30-day post-operative complicationsFrom the operation until after 30 daysMSKCC surgical complications grading method and CTCAE v4.03 criteria will be adopted for evaluating the perioperative complications
Validation of iMODELFrom randomization to operationiMODEL score to predict complete resection
Time to first subsequent anticancer therapyUp to 60 months after last patient randomizedFrom date of randomization until the date of first recurrent anticancer therapy
Time to second subsequent anticancer therapyUp to 60 months after last patient randomizedFrom date of randomization until the date of secondary recurrent anticancer therapy
Quality of life assessmentsStudy entry; 6 months; 12 months; 24 months and 60 months after randomizationThe EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3.0) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Ovary (FACT-O)
Patient complianceUp to 60 months after last patient randomizedcompliance with protocol

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026