Skip to content

Comparison of Two Techniques in Achieving Corneal Graft

Comparison of Manual and Automated Techniques in Achieving Posterior Lamellar Transplantation of the Cornea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01610973
Enrollment
40
Registered
2012-06-04
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2016-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fuch's Endothelial Dystrophy

Keywords

Fuch's dystrophy, Corneal graft

Brief summary

The cornea is a transparent membrane, half a millimeter thick, embedded as a window in front of the eye. When the eye becomes opaque, the eye is not seeing and the only way to restore the visual acuity is to replace the cornea by performing a graft (4000 surgeries per year in France). In half the cases the opacification of the cornea is secondary to dysfunction of the endothelium, cell layer of 15 μm thickness, covering its posterior surface, in charge of regulating the moisture of the corneal thickness and therefore its transparency. While the total corneal transplantation has long been the only intervention for these diseases, it is now possible, from 4-5 years, to replace only the very thin: it is called endothelial transplant or graft lamellar later. This intervention is now experiencing significant success as it reduces very significantly the incidence of complications found after transplantation of total cornea and the visual recovery period. This type of transplant is still difficult to achieve and the best technique is not yet established. Indeed, posterior lamellar transplantation of the cornea may be done manually or using an automated device. Manual techniques allow the preparation of grafts extremely thin but are difficult to achieve while the automatic techniques, easier, prepare thicker grafts that may be less efficient in visual recovery. The aim of this project is to conduct a prospective study in order to compare these two techniques in terms of postoperative visual recovery and the vitality of the graft during the first year. To date, there is no such study. The department of Ophthalmology in the University Hospital of Rouen is one of the most famous French teams in the field of cornea transplants and receives many patients from different French regions. The recruitment of 40 patients needed to study should be done without great difficulty over a period of 18 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndothelial descemet membrane graft

Standard Endothelial descemet membrane graft

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* men and woman * 18 years old or more * Patient having been informed about the study and having signed a non-opposition to the participation

Exclusion criteria

* Patient presenting an associated eye pathology previously known and able to limit the visual recovery (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, ...) * Pregnant women, parturient or breast feeding * refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of visual acuity1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occular hypertensionDay 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 yearMeasurement of occular hypertension
Measurement of visual acuityMonth 1, Month 2, Month 6
Partial or complete graft detachmentDay 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 year% of detachment
Necessity of air injectionDay 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 yearNecessity of air injection : yes/no
Defeat of the graftDay 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 yearDefeat of the graft : yes/no

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026