Skip to content

A Long-term Safety Extension Study of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) in Multiple Sclerosis

A Double Blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial of a Combination of THC and CBD in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, Followed by an Open Label Assessment and Study Extension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01610687
Enrollment
137
Registered
2012-06-04
Start date
2001-07-31
Completion date
2005-02-28
Last updated
2023-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Spasticity

Brief summary

An extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of GW-1000-02 treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Detailed description

Patients who participated in the placebo controlled phase of this study and opted to continue receiving open label GW-1000-02 entered the follow-on extension of the study and completed symptom assessments to determine whether they were continuing to receive clinical benefit from GW-1000-02.

Interventions

Contained THC and CBD as extract of Cannabis sativa L. Each 100 μl actuation delivered a dose containing 2.7 mg THC and 2.5mg CBD. The maximum permitted dose was eight actuations (22 mg THC and 20 mg CBD) in any three hour period, and 48 actuations (130 mg THC and 120 mg CBD) in any 24 hour period.

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged at least 18 years. * Multiple Sclerosis of any type. * Stable Multiple Sclerosis symptomatology during the four weeks before study entry. * Symptoms of the required severity (\>50 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale severity scale) in least one of the specified impairment categories; spasticity, muscle spasms, disturbed bladder control, neuropathic pain, limb tremor. * A stable medication regime during the four weeks before study entry. * Willing to abstain from cannabis or cannabinoids for at least seven days before study entry, and during the study. * Agreed either to use effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter, or had been surgically sterilised or, if female, were post-menopausal. * Clinically acceptable laboratory results for pre-study screening. * Willing and able to undertake and comply with all study requirements. * Willing and able to read, consider and understand the subject information and consent form and give written informed consent. Subjects unable to read or to sign the document procedures were treated as detailed in the Declaration of Helsinki. * Willing for their general practitioner, and consultant if appropriate, to be informed of study participation. * Willing for their name to be notified to Home Office for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Known or strongly suspected to be abusing drugs, including alcohol. * Not prepared to abstain from cannabis or cannabinoids during the study. * Current or past addiction to cannabis. * Known or suspected to have had an adverse reaction to cannabinoids causing psychosis or other severe psychiatric illness. * History of any type of schizophrenia, any other psychotic illness, or other significant psychiatric illness or personality disorder other than depression associated with chronic illness. * Received any drug containing levodopa (Sinemet®, Sinemet plus®, Levodopa®, L-dopa®, Madopar®, Benserazide®). * Serious cardiovascular disorder including angina, uncontrolled hypertension, or an uncontrolled symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia. * Significant renal or hepatic impairment as shown in medical history or indicated by laboratory results. * History of epilepsy. * Terminal illness or other condition in which placebo medication would be inappropriate. * Pregnant, lactating or at risk of pregnancy. * Participated in any other clinical research study during the 12 weeks before study entry. * Planned hospital admission between study entry and Visit 6. * Planned travel outside the UK between study entry and Visit 6.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safetyup to1206 daysThe number of patients who experienced an adverse event during the course of this extension study is presented

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Sprays of Study Medication Taken During the Last 6 Days of Treatmentup to 1206 daysA categorical summary was produced of the mean number of sprays per day during the last six days of treatment, and the mean number of sprays was rounded to the nearest whole number for categorisation.
Change From Baseline in Mean Intoxication 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Scores at Week 18.18 weeksIntoxication levels were recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 equals 'no intoxication' and 10 equals 'extreme intoxication'. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in intoxication levels.
Investigator Assessed Global Severity Score at Week 18week 18The investigator rated the global severity of the subject's primary condition since entry into the study using a five-point verbal rating scale-5: 1=much worse, 2=worse, 3=no change, 4=better, 5=much better. The number of patients which were considered better or much better (scores 4 and 5) at week 18 of the study better is presented.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18week 18A clinical assessment of pain was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Spasticity 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18week 18A clinical assessment of spasticity was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no spasticity and 100 = worst possible spasticity. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Tremor 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18week 18A clinical assessment of tremor was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no tremor and 100 = worst possible tremor. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Bladder Problems 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 1818 weeksA clinical assessment of bladder problems was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no bladder problems and 100 = worst possible bladder problems. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GW-1000-02
Active treatment
137
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event18
Overall StudyCannabis affecting job1
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyFelt more alter without study medication1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy26
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4
Overall StudyMoved out of area6
Overall StudySymptom control without study medication2
Overall StudyUnable to make journey1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGW-1000-02
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
127 Participants
Age, Continuous50.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.531
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
137 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
127 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safety

The number of patients who experienced an adverse event during the course of this extension study is presented

Time frame: up to1206 days

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GW-1000-02Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safety126 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Intoxication 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Scores at Week 18.

Intoxication levels were recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 equals 'no intoxication' and 10 equals 'extreme intoxication'. A decrease in score indicates an improvement in intoxication levels.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Change From Baseline in Mean Intoxication 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Scores at Week 18.2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Bladder Problems 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18

A clinical assessment of bladder problems was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no bladder problems and 100 = worst possible bladder problems. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Change From Baseline in the Mean Bladder Problems 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18-33.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18

A clinical assessment of pain was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: week 18

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18-31.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Spasticity 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18

A clinical assessment of spasticity was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no spasticity and 100 = worst possible spasticity. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: week 18

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Change From Baseline in the Mean Spasticity 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18-27.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.46
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Tremor 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18

A clinical assessment of tremor was made at each study visit using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 = no tremor and 100 = worst possible tremor. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: week 18

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Change From Baseline in the Mean Tremor 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 18-26.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Secondary

Investigator Assessed Global Severity Score at Week 18

The investigator rated the global severity of the subject's primary condition since entry into the study using a five-point verbal rating scale-5: 1=much worse, 2=worse, 3=no change, 4=better, 5=much better. The number of patients which were considered better or much better (scores 4 and 5) at week 18 of the study better is presented.

Time frame: week 18

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GW-1000-02Investigator Assessed Global Severity Score at Week 1892 participants
Secondary

Mean Number of Sprays of Study Medication Taken During the Last 6 Days of Treatment

A categorical summary was produced of the mean number of sprays per day during the last six days of treatment, and the mean number of sprays was rounded to the nearest whole number for categorisation.

Time frame: up to 1206 days

Population: All subjects who took at least one dose of study medication after the end of the Part B open-label phase of the acute study, and yielded on-treatment efficacy data was classed as the efficacy and safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GW-1000-02Mean Number of Sprays of Study Medication Taken During the Last 6 Days of Treatment8.09 sprays of study medicationStandard Deviation 7.91

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026