Skip to content

Air Barrier System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

Air Barrier System to Reduce Contamination of Wounds During Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01610271
Acronym
ABS
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-06-04
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2019-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Site Infection

Keywords

Prevention, Surgical Site Infection, Air Barrier System, Implant Infection

Brief summary

Airborne particles are present in all indoor environments including the operating room. Most of these particles come from the surgical staff moving around in the room, positioning of the patient during surgery, and the movement of surgical equipment and supplies. While the amount of particulate in an operating room is much, much less than is found in a typical home or public space, some particulate is usually present no matter how the room and air are cleaned and filtered. Typically these few particulate cause no problems, but the goal is always to have the cleanest air possible during surgery. The Air Barrier System (ABS) consists of a reusable blower and a sterile nozzle. The blower feeds filtered air into the sterile disposable nozzle, which disperses a constant stream of gentle, high purity air over the surgical incision. This stream of air forms a shield over the surgical area to prevent airborne particulate from settling into the open wound. This is particularly critical for long-duration surgeries, such as procedures that involve the implantation of a prosthesis. The main objective of this research study is to determine whether the ABS can reduce the potential for surgical site infection during total hip replacement, spinal fusion, or lower extremity bypass grafting procedures. These procedures were chosen because each is a long-duration procedure which involves implantation of prosthesis.

Detailed description

Surgical site infection (SSI) following prosthesis implantation and other invasive procedures is a serious complication leading to increased mortality, morbidity, and financial cost to patients and the U.S. healthcare infrastructure. Multiple studies have shown that the primary source of surgical site bacterial colonization is staphylococci shed from the skin of people present in the surgical theatre. These bacteria-carrying skin cells are aerosolized into the environment and deposit into surgical incisions. The innovations currently pursued in research and industry to combat nosocomial infection fall primarily into three categories: (1) developing new antimicrobial drugs and agents, (2) developing antimicrobial coatings for devices, and (3) implementing procedures to reduce the risk of cross-contamination. Significant resources are being allocated to prevent infections from developing post-operatively and to mitigate the effects of infection once microorganisms enter the body. However, there is little development of new technologies that can be employed in the operating room to prevent the initial intrusion into the surgery site. All modern surgical theatres utilize some form of air filtration. In a conventional flow system, air streams mix freely in the room. In an OR designed for laminar flow (LFOR), air emits from filters and proceeds into the room in relatively coherent streams. The benefit thought to be achieved by a LFOR, in principle, is that filtered air does not mix with contaminated air before reaching the surgery area. The difficulty in achieving the desired results in a LFOR lies in the fact that once the flow pattern enters the room, it is subjected to a very complex set of dynamics over a significant distance. Air is clean upon leaving the filter bank, but it enters a space laden with airborne bacteria and particulate matter shed from people in the OR. Nimbic Systems has developed a device, the Air Barrier System (ABS), which shields surgical sites from airborne contaminants in the operating room by creating a localized clean air field directly adjacent to and surrounding the incision site. The ABS consists of two components: a Filter and an air Nozzle with attached Hose. The Filter is a nonsterile reusable component which filters ambient operating room air and forces it through an exit port on the top of the unit. The Nozzle is attached on top of the incision drape adjacent to a surgical incision with Velcro® fastening pads. The end of the Hose is plugged into the Filter's air exit port. Contaminant-free air then flows through the Hose and Nozzle over the incision site. The ABS maintains this protective envelope of bacteria-free air over a wide range of patient and incision site geometries, yet the insertion of hands and instruments are not disrupted by the protective envelope. The ABS technology was extremely successful at reducing the presence of bacteria and other colony forming units at incision sites during Phase I study. In a randomized, prospective clinical study of 36 hip arthroplasty procedures, the ABS reduced the presence of colony forming units at incision sites by 84% versus ambient operating room levels. This will be a prospective randomized double-blind pilot trial of the ABS in three surgical specialty applications (total hip arthroplasty, lumbar laminectomy with instrumentation, and femoral-popliteal bypass graft). A cohort of 300 recruited patients will be randomly assigned, at a 1:1 ratio, to either a control group (no ABS) or experimental group (with ABS). The primary outcome of the trial is the occurrence of SSI by one year after surgery using the established CDC definitions and classifications of surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes include (1) measuring levels of colony forming units (CFU) present in the operating room air during surgical procedures to examine correlations with occurrence of SSI; (2) examining types of organisms that cause SSI in the two study groups; and (3) surgeon satisfaction with the ABS device. Patient characteristics and measures of operating room environment will be collected during surgery, and the patients' surgical sites will be clinically evaluated following surgery to identify potential superficial or deep SSI up to one year after surgery. The estimated occurrence of SSI in the control group is 6%, based on baseline data pertaining to the three studied types of surgery at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. The anticipated rate of SSI in the experimental group is 3%. The proposed pilot study is designed to detect a clinically relevant reduction (i.e., a 50% reduction, from 6% to 3%) in the observed rate of SSI in patients who are exposed to the ABS vs. no ABS. The results of this proposed pilot trial will be used to construct a subsequent pivotal prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial.

Interventions

ABS is a device that emits a stream of purified air over the surgical site creating a barrier that prevents the intrusion of bacteria.

Sponsors

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Baylor College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Nimbic Systems, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* This study will recruit adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, lumbar fusion with instrumentation, or femoral-popliteal bypass graft surgical procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of any of the following factors will exclude patients from enrollment in the study: 1. History of prior prosthesis infection 2. Active infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Implant Infection (Number of Occurrences in Each Arm).One year after surgeryFewer patients in the Air Barrier System group will have implant infection compared to the Control group. Diagnosis of SSI was made by a physician who was masked to the patients' group assignment and not involved in the patients' care by evaluating medical records using the standard and extremely widely used (clinically, epidemiologically, and in research) CDC criteria\*, which categorize SSI into superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ/space/implant levels. Superficial and deep incisional infections were defined and reported as incisional infections, whereas organ/space/implant level infections were defined and reported as implant infections. \*See Mangram AJ, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250-278.
Comparison of Levels of Airborne CFU Measured at Incision Sites Between the Control and Air Barrier System GroupsOne year post surgeryAirborne CFU samplers will be used to monitor bacterial populations at the location immediately adjacent to the surgical site. Air will be drawn through a length of PVC tubing onto agar plates at ten minute intervals. Plates will be incubated for 36 hours at 35 degrees Celsius. Staining and morphological identification will be used to identify and count viable bacteria.
Percent of Patients With Implant Surgical Site InfectionWithin One Year of Surgical ProcedurePatient will be clinically evaluated to identify potential implant SSI through daily visits during the hospital stay, at subsequent clinic visits and hospital stays, or telephonically on a monthly basis for one year. If encounter indicates the potential presence of SSI, physician will make diagnosis of SSI using the CDC criteria. Organ/space/implant level infections were defined and reported as implant infections.
Percent of Patients With Incisional Surgical Site InfectionWithin One Year of Surgical ProcedurePatient will be clinically evaluated to identify potential incisional SSI through daily visits during the hospital stay, at subsequent clinic visits and hospital stays, or telephonically on a monthly basis for one year. If encounter indicates the potential presence of SSI, physician will make diagnosis of SSI using the CDC criteria. Superficial and deep incisional infections were defined and reported as incisional infections.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
The Air Barrier System will NOT be employed throughout the surgical procedure for this group of patients.
146
Air Barrier System
The Air Barrier System will be employed throughout the surgical procedure for this group of patients.
148
Total294

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProsthesis not implanted23
Overall StudySurgery not complete01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAir Barrier SystemControl
Age, Customized
Age in Years
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score
ASA Score 1
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score
ASA Score 2
74 Participants39 Participants35 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score
ASA Score 3
209 Participants105 Participants104 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score
ASA Score 4
9 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
BMI (kg/m^2)29.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
28.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
History of Cancer
No
255 participants127 participants128 participants
History of Cancer
Yes
39 participants21 participants18 participants
History of cardiopulmonary condition
No
21 participants9 participants12 participants
History of cardiopulmonary condition
Yes
273 participants139 participants134 participants
History of diabetes mellitus (type I or II)
No
241 participants120 participants121 participants
History of diabetes mellitus (type I or II)
Yes
53 participants28 participants25 participants
History of neurological condition
No
126 participants63 participants63 participants
History of neurological condition
Yes
168 participants85 participants83 participants
History of smoking
No
98 participants39 participants59 participants
History of smoking
Yes
196 participants109 participants87 participants
Number of people in operating room8.6 People in operating room
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
8.6 People in operating room
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
8.6 People in operating room
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis
No
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis
Yes
294 participants148 participants146 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
294 participants148 participants146 participants
Revision surgery
No
266 participants133 participants133 participants
Revision surgery
Yes
28 participants15 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
278 Participants140 Participants138 Participants
Surgery time (minutes)115.0 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.8
115.8 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.5
114.2 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55
Surgery type
Spine Surgery
132 participants66 participants66 participants
Surgery type
Total Hip Arthroplasty
146 participants73 participants73 participants
Surgery type
Vascular Surgery
16 participants9 participants7 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1460 / 148
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1460 / 148

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Levels of Airborne CFU Measured at Incision Sites Between the Control and Air Barrier System Groups

Airborne CFU samplers will be used to monitor bacterial populations at the location immediately adjacent to the surgical site. Air will be drawn through a length of PVC tubing onto agar plates at ten minute intervals. Plates will be incubated for 36 hours at 35 degrees Celsius. Staining and morphological identification will be used to identify and count viable bacteria.

Time frame: One year post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlComparison of Levels of Airborne CFU Measured at Incision Sites Between the Control and Air Barrier System Groups5.3 CFU/m^3Standard Deviation 7.1
Air Barrier SystemComparison of Levels of Airborne CFU Measured at Incision Sites Between the Control and Air Barrier System Groups2.5 CFU/m^3Standard Deviation 4.6
Primary

Incidence of Implant Infection (Number of Occurrences in Each Arm).

Fewer patients in the Air Barrier System group will have implant infection compared to the Control group. Diagnosis of SSI was made by a physician who was masked to the patients' group assignment and not involved in the patients' care by evaluating medical records using the standard and extremely widely used (clinically, epidemiologically, and in research) CDC criteria\*, which categorize SSI into superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ/space/implant levels. Superficial and deep incisional infections were defined and reported as incisional infections, whereas organ/space/implant level infections were defined and reported as implant infections. \*See Mangram AJ, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250-278.

Time frame: One year after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlIncidence of Implant Infection (Number of Occurrences in Each Arm).4 Participants
Air Barrier SystemIncidence of Implant Infection (Number of Occurrences in Each Arm).0 Participants
Comparison: A sample size of 150 per group provided a power of 80% to detect a statistically significant (α≤0.05) 3% difference in SSI rate based on a historical infection rate of 6% in the facility where operations were performed.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.01, 2.05]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percent of Patients With Implant Surgical Site Infection

Patient will be clinically evaluated to identify potential implant SSI through daily visits during the hospital stay, at subsequent clinic visits and hospital stays, or telephonically on a monthly basis for one year. If encounter indicates the potential presence of SSI, physician will make diagnosis of SSI using the CDC criteria. Organ/space/implant level infections were defined and reported as implant infections.

Time frame: Within One Year of Surgical Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercent of Patients With Implant Surgical Site Infection2.7 percentage of participants
Air Barrier SystemPercent of Patients With Implant Surgical Site Infection0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Patients With Incisional Surgical Site Infection

Patient will be clinically evaluated to identify potential incisional SSI through daily visits during the hospital stay, at subsequent clinic visits and hospital stays, or telephonically on a monthly basis for one year. If encounter indicates the potential presence of SSI, physician will make diagnosis of SSI using the CDC criteria. Superficial and deep incisional infections were defined and reported as incisional infections.

Time frame: Within One Year of Surgical Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercent of Patients With Incisional Surgical Site Infection2.0 percentage of participants
Air Barrier SystemPercent of Patients With Incisional Surgical Site Infection2.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026