Depression
Conditions
Keywords
Algorithm, Depression, Assurex, GeneSight
Brief summary
This was a study of a genotyping tool that reported on how subjects responded to medications and could be used in a community psychiatry practice to improve medication choice for depression. After the DNA test, an interpretive report was provided to the subjects' physicians. The hypothesis of this pilot study was that it was feasible to use this pharmacogenomic algorithm in a new setting to treat depressed subjects..
Detailed description
Antidepressant medications are among the most widely prescribed medications. However, only 35% to 45% of depressed patients have a complete remission of their illness when initially treated with these medications. Consequently, the Mayo Clinic psychiatric pharmacogenomic team developed a pharmacogenomic algorithm designed to improve the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant medications by providing guidance in medication selection and appropriate dosing. This algorithm has been incorporated into a new genotyping interpretative report. The pharmacogenomic algorithm is based on genotyping both copies of four informative genes. These four genes are: 1) the Cytochrome (P450 2D6) gene; 2) the Cytochrome (P450 2C19) gene; 3) the Serotonin Transporter gene (SLC6A4); and 4) the Serotonin 2A receptor gene (5HTR2A). The trial took place at the Franciscan Skemp Healthcare System in La Crosse, Wisconsin over the course of 12 months.
Interventions
Genetic test results for 4 genes were put through algorithm and provided to physician for guidance prescribing medication.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient is between the ages of 18 and 80. 2. Major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified as ascertained by a physician or mental health professional licensed to diagnose. 3. Patient is an outpatient and not in imminent need of inpatient hospitalization, or a discharging inpatient with scheduled follow-up with a Behavioral Health psychiatrist. 4. Patient has been referred to see a psychiatrist for optimum medication management. 5. Patient's Hamilton Depression Rating score is \>14 6. Ability to read, understand and sign an informed consent document
Exclusion criteria
1. Serious medical illness (as ascertained via the initial triage screening process) 2. Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder 3. Patients with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective disorder 4. Patients who are legally unable to consent to enrollment in the study (i.e. patients with legal guardians)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline | baseline, 8-week visit | The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores \>/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline | baseline, 8-week visit | The PHQ-9 is the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire. The PHQ-9 is based directly on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 27 (severe symptoms) for depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression symptoms. |
| Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | baseline, 8-week visit | The Genesight algorithm presents recommendations for antidepressants and antipsychotics in bin status associated with colors. Green indicates Use as Directed. Yellow indicates Use with Caution. Red indicates Use with Increased Caution and with More Frequent Monitoring. Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms. |
| Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization | baseline, 8-week visit | Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detailing their experiences during the study period. |
| Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline | baseline, 8-week visit | The HAMD-17 is a 17-item scale that evaluates depressed mood, vegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression, and co-morbid anxiety symptoms. The 17 items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale. In general, the 5 point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=doubtful to mild; 2=mild to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe. The 3-point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=probable or mild; 2=definite. The total HAMD-17 score ranges from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms. |
| Responders at Week 8 | baseline, 8 weeks | Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of responder: a participant who had 50% or higher reduction in psychiatric score from baseline. |
| Remitters at Week 8 | baseline, 8 weeks | Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of remitter: a participant with score less than or equal to certain value (HAMD-17 \<=7, QIDS-C16\<=5, PHQ-9\<5). |
| Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | 8-week visit | Physicians reported on their perception of each participant's satisfaction with their care only for patients who completed the 8-week study. Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detaining their experience during the study period. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted at Franciscan Skemp Hospital in La Crosse, Wisconsin, a member of the Mayo Clinic Health System.
Pre-assignment details
233 male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) were approached for consent. 3 patients refused consent. 3 participants failed to meet eligibility criteria.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Guided A pharmacogenomic algorithm (GeneSight) guided treatment decisions for antidepressant medication selection and appropriate dosing. | 114 |
| Unguided Treatment as usual | 113 |
| Total | 227 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 42 | 20 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Guided | Unguided | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 | 44.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 42.62 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 114 participants | 113 participants | 227 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 69 Participants | 77 Participants | 146 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 45 Participants | 36 Participants | 81 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 114 | 0 / 113 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 114 | 0 / 113 |
Outcome results
Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline
The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores \>/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.
Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit
Population: This analysis was performed on subjects who completed the study. There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -41.2 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green/yellow category (n=48, 63) | -48.4 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -11.0 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green/yellow category (n=48, 63) | -31.8 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline
The HAMD-17 is a 17-item scale that evaluates depressed mood, vegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression, and co-morbid anxiety symptoms. The 17 items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale. In general, the 5 point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=doubtful to mild; 2=mild to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe. The 3-point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=probable or mild; 2=definite. The total HAMD-17 score ranges from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit
Population: This analysis was performed on subjects who completed the study. There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -42.2 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green or yellow category (n=48, 63) | -49.5 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 28.4 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -15.0 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green or yellow category (n=48, 63) | -35.6 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group
The Genesight algorithm presents recommendations for antidepressants and antipsychotics in bin status associated with colors. Green indicates Use as Directed. Yellow indicates Use with Caution. Red indicates Use with Increased Caution and with More Frequent Monitoring. Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit
Population: All subjects were evaluated for a bin status, but not all the arms had subjects assigned to every bin status (green, yellow, or red). Bin status for each category title is reported as (n=Guided, Unguided).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in HAMD-17 score, red (n=16, 18) | -42.2 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in HAMD-17 score, green/yellow (n=48,63) | -49.5 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 28.4 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in QIDS-C16 score, red (n=16,18) | -41.2 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in QIDS-C16 score green/yellow (n=48,63) | -48.4 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in PHQ-9 score, red (n=16,18) | -46.3 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 35.8 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in PHQ-9 score, green/yellow (n=47,63) | -44.0 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 39.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in PHQ-9 score, red (n=16,18) | -15.5 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 31.4 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in HAMD-17 score, red (n=16, 18) | -15.0 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in QIDS-C16 score green/yellow (n=48,63) | -31.8 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in HAMD-17 score, green/yellow (n=48,63) | -35.6 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in PHQ-9 score, green/yellow (n=47,63) | -20.7 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 63.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group | %Change in QIDS-C16 score, red (n=16,18) | -11 Percentage change | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline
The PHQ-9 is the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire. The PHQ-9 is based directly on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 27 (severe symptoms) for depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression symptoms.
Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit
Population: There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided). One subject in the guided arm (green/yellow) did not complete the PHQ-9 questionnaire at 8 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -46.3 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 35.8 |
| Guided | Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green/yellow category (n=47, 63) | -44.0 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 39.9 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline | Subjects in red category (n=16, 18) | -15.5 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 31.4 |
| Unguided | Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline | Subjects in green/yellow category (n=47, 63) | -20.7 Percentage change in depression rating | Standard Deviation 63.9 |
Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization
Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detailing their experiences during the study period.
Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit
Population: The medication changes of patients were recorded only for patients who completed the 8-week study (n=72,93 for guided and unguided arms). For each row below, the number of subjects analyzed is indicated by (n=guided, unguided) arms.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization | Overall med/dose changes (n=72, 93) | 76.8 percentage of participants |
| Guided | Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization | Med/dose changes in red bin subjects (n=16, 18) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization | Overall med/dose changes (n=72, 93) | 44.1 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization | Med/dose changes in red bin subjects (n=16, 18) | 55.6 percentage of participants |
Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care
Physicians reported on their perception of each participant's satisfaction with their care only for patients who completed the 8-week study. Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detaining their experience during the study period.
Time frame: 8-week visit
Population: Physicians completed surveys for 89 participants (96%) from the unguided group, and for 37 participants (51.4%) from the guided group. For each row below, the number of subjects analyzed is indicated by (n=guided, unguided) arms. For the first row, one of the physicians who completed the survey did not answer this question.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Very high patient satisfaction (n=37,88) | 40.5 percentage of physicians |
| Guided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Physicians satisfied with care (n=37,89) | 94.6 percentage of physicians |
| Guided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Very confident/confident med selection (n=37,89) | 91.9 percentage of physicians |
| Unguided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Very high patient satisfaction (n=37,88) | 14.8 percentage of physicians |
| Unguided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Physicians satisfied with care (n=37,89) | 61.8 percentage of physicians |
| Unguided | Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care | Very confident/confident med selection (n=37,89) | 61.8 percentage of physicians |
Remitters at Week 8
Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of remitter: a participant with score less than or equal to certain value (HAMD-17 \<=7, QIDS-C16\<=5, PHQ-9\<5).
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Remitters at Week 8 | HAMD-17 | 30.6 percentage of participants |
| Guided | Remitters at Week 8 | PHQ-9 | 25.4 percentage of participants |
| Guided | Remitters at Week 8 | QIDS-C16 | 26.4 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Remitters at Week 8 | HAMD-17 | 21.5 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Remitters at Week 8 | PHQ-9 | 16.1 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Remitters at Week 8 | QIDS-C16 | 12.9 percentage of participants |
Responders at Week 8
Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of responder: a participant who had 50% or higher reduction in psychiatric score from baseline.
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided | Responders at Week 8 | HAMD-17 | 43.1 percentage of participants |
| Guided | Responders at Week 8 | PHQ-9 | 50.7 percentage of participants |
| Guided | Responders at Week 8 | QIDS-C16 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Responders at Week 8 | HAMD-17 | 26.9 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Responders at Week 8 | PHQ-9 | 31.2 percentage of participants |
| Unguided | Responders at Week 8 | QIDS-C16 | 23.7 percentage of participants |