Skip to content

Evaluation of an Antidepressant Pharmacogenomic Algorithm in an Outpatient Clinical Setting

A Pilot Study for the Evaluation of the Clinic-wide Impact of the Antidepressant Pharmacogenomic Algorithm in an Outpatient Clinical Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01610063
Enrollment
227
Registered
2012-06-01
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Algorithm, Depression, Assurex, GeneSight

Brief summary

This was a study of a genotyping tool that reported on how subjects responded to medications and could be used in a community psychiatry practice to improve medication choice for depression. After the DNA test, an interpretive report was provided to the subjects' physicians. The hypothesis of this pilot study was that it was feasible to use this pharmacogenomic algorithm in a new setting to treat depressed subjects..

Detailed description

Antidepressant medications are among the most widely prescribed medications. However, only 35% to 45% of depressed patients have a complete remission of their illness when initially treated with these medications. Consequently, the Mayo Clinic psychiatric pharmacogenomic team developed a pharmacogenomic algorithm designed to improve the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant medications by providing guidance in medication selection and appropriate dosing. This algorithm has been incorporated into a new genotyping interpretative report. The pharmacogenomic algorithm is based on genotyping both copies of four informative genes. These four genes are: 1) the Cytochrome (P450 2D6) gene; 2) the Cytochrome (P450 2C19) gene; 3) the Serotonin Transporter gene (SLC6A4); and 4) the Serotonin 2A receptor gene (5HTR2A). The trial took place at the Franciscan Skemp Healthcare System in La Crosse, Wisconsin over the course of 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERPharmacogenomic algorithm

Genetic test results for 4 genes were put through algorithm and provided to physician for guidance prescribing medication.

Sponsors

Assurex Health Home
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is between the ages of 18 and 80. 2. Major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified as ascertained by a physician or mental health professional licensed to diagnose. 3. Patient is an outpatient and not in imminent need of inpatient hospitalization, or a discharging inpatient with scheduled follow-up with a Behavioral Health psychiatrist. 4. Patient has been referred to see a psychiatrist for optimum medication management. 5. Patient's Hamilton Depression Rating score is \>14 6. Ability to read, understand and sign an informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious medical illness (as ascertained via the initial triage screening process) 2. Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder 3. Patients with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective disorder 4. Patients who are legally unable to consent to enrollment in the study (i.e. patients with legal guardians)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baselinebaseline, 8-week visitThe QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores \>/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baselinebaseline, 8-week visitThe PHQ-9 is the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire. The PHQ-9 is based directly on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 27 (severe symptoms) for depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression symptoms.
Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Groupbaseline, 8-week visitThe Genesight algorithm presents recommendations for antidepressants and antipsychotics in bin status associated with colors. Green indicates Use as Directed. Yellow indicates Use with Caution. Red indicates Use with Increased Caution and with More Frequent Monitoring. Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.
Pharmacogenomic Report Utilizationbaseline, 8-week visitPhysicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detailing their experiences during the study period.
Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baselinebaseline, 8-week visitThe HAMD-17 is a 17-item scale that evaluates depressed mood, vegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression, and co-morbid anxiety symptoms. The 17 items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale. In general, the 5 point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=doubtful to mild; 2=mild to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe. The 3-point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=probable or mild; 2=definite. The total HAMD-17 score ranges from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.
Responders at Week 8baseline, 8 weeksDefinitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of responder: a participant who had 50% or higher reduction in psychiatric score from baseline.
Remitters at Week 8baseline, 8 weeksDefinitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of remitter: a participant with score less than or equal to certain value (HAMD-17 \<=7, QIDS-C16\<=5, PHQ-9\<5).
Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care8-week visitPhysicians reported on their perception of each participant's satisfaction with their care only for patients who completed the 8-week study. Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detaining their experience during the study period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at Franciscan Skemp Hospital in La Crosse, Wisconsin, a member of the Mayo Clinic Health System.

Pre-assignment details

233 male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) were approached for consent. 3 patients refused consent. 3 participants failed to meet eligibility criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Guided
A pharmacogenomic algorithm (GeneSight) guided treatment decisions for antidepressant medication selection and appropriate dosing.
114
Unguided
Treatment as usual
113
Total227

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGuidedUnguidedTotal
Age, Continuous41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
42.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55
Region of Enrollment
United States
114 participants113 participants227 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
69 Participants77 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants36 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1140 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1140 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline

The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores \>/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.

Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit

Population: This analysis was performed on subjects who completed the study. There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GuidedPercentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-41.2 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 31.7
GuidedPercentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From BaselineSubjects in green/yellow category (n=48, 63)-48.4 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 28.1
UnguidedPercentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-11.0 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 31.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From BaselineSubjects in green/yellow category (n=48, 63)-31.8 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 29.8
Comparison: Comparison for QIDS-C16p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline

The HAMD-17 is a 17-item scale that evaluates depressed mood, vegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression, and co-morbid anxiety symptoms. The 17 items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale. In general, the 5 point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=doubtful to mild; 2=mild to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe. The 3-point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=probable or mild; 2=definite. The total HAMD-17 score ranges from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit

Population: This analysis was performed on subjects who completed the study. There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GuidedPercentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-42.2 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 24.8
GuidedPercentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From BaselineSubjects in green or yellow category (n=48, 63)-49.5 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 28.4
UnguidedPercentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-15.0 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 20.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From BaselineSubjects in green or yellow category (n=48, 63)-35.6 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 31.7
Comparison: Comparison between groups for HAMD-17p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group

The Genesight algorithm presents recommendations for antidepressants and antipsychotics in bin status associated with colors. Green indicates Use as Directed. Yellow indicates Use with Caution. Red indicates Use with Increased Caution and with More Frequent Monitoring. Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit

Population: All subjects were evaluated for a bin status, but not all the arms had subjects assigned to every bin status (green, yellow, or red). Bin status for each category title is reported as (n=Guided, Unguided).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in HAMD-17 score, red (n=16, 18)-42.2 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 24.8
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in HAMD-17 score, green/yellow (n=48,63)-49.5 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.4
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in QIDS-C16 score, red (n=16,18)-41.2 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.7
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in QIDS-C16 score green/yellow (n=48,63)-48.4 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.1
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in PHQ-9 score, red (n=16,18)-46.3 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.8
GuidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in PHQ-9 score, green/yellow (n=47,63)-44.0 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in PHQ-9 score, red (n=16,18)-15.5 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.4
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in HAMD-17 score, red (n=16, 18)-15.0 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 20.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in QIDS-C16 score green/yellow (n=48,63)-31.8 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 29.8
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in HAMD-17 score, green/yellow (n=48,63)-35.6 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.7
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in PHQ-9 score, green/yellow (n=47,63)-20.7 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 63.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group%Change in QIDS-C16 score, red (n=16,18)-11 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.9
Secondary

Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline

The PHQ-9 is the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire. The PHQ-9 is based directly on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 27 (severe symptoms) for depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression symptoms.

Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit

Population: There were 8 out of 72 patients in the guided arm and 12 out of 93 patients in the unguided arm who did not have assigned medication color in green/yellow/red. The number analyzed per row is indicated as (n=guided,unguided). One subject in the guided arm (green/yellow) did not complete the PHQ-9 questionnaire at 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GuidedPercentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-46.3 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 35.8
GuidedPercentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From BaselineSubjects in green/yellow category (n=47, 63)-44.0 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 39.9
UnguidedPercentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From BaselineSubjects in red category (n=16, 18)-15.5 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 31.4
UnguidedPercentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From BaselineSubjects in green/yellow category (n=47, 63)-20.7 Percentage change in depression ratingStandard Deviation 63.9
Comparison: Comparison for PHQ-9p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization

Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detailing their experiences during the study period.

Time frame: baseline, 8-week visit

Population: The medication changes of patients were recorded only for patients who completed the 8-week study (n=72,93 for guided and unguided arms). For each row below, the number of subjects analyzed is indicated by (n=guided, unguided) arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GuidedPharmacogenomic Report UtilizationOverall med/dose changes (n=72, 93)76.8 percentage of participants
GuidedPharmacogenomic Report UtilizationMed/dose changes in red bin subjects (n=16, 18)93.8 percentage of participants
UnguidedPharmacogenomic Report UtilizationOverall med/dose changes (n=72, 93)44.1 percentage of participants
UnguidedPharmacogenomic Report UtilizationMed/dose changes in red bin subjects (n=16, 18)55.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care

Physicians reported on their perception of each participant's satisfaction with their care only for patients who completed the 8-week study. Physicians were directed to complete a survey for each participant detaining their experience during the study period.

Time frame: 8-week visit

Population: Physicians completed surveys for 89 participants (96%) from the unguided group, and for 37 participants (51.4%) from the guided group. For each row below, the number of subjects analyzed is indicated by (n=guided, unguided) arms. For the first row, one of the physicians who completed the survey did not answer this question.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GuidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CareVery high patient satisfaction (n=37,88)40.5 percentage of physicians
GuidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CarePhysicians satisfied with care (n=37,89)94.6 percentage of physicians
GuidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CareVery confident/confident med selection (n=37,89)91.9 percentage of physicians
UnguidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CareVery high patient satisfaction (n=37,88)14.8 percentage of physicians
UnguidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CarePhysicians satisfied with care (n=37,89)61.8 percentage of physicians
UnguidedPhysicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their CareVery confident/confident med selection (n=37,89)61.8 percentage of physicians
Secondary

Remitters at Week 8

Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of remitter: a participant with score less than or equal to certain value (HAMD-17 \<=7, QIDS-C16\<=5, PHQ-9\<5).

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GuidedRemitters at Week 8HAMD-1730.6 percentage of participants
GuidedRemitters at Week 8PHQ-925.4 percentage of participants
GuidedRemitters at Week 8QIDS-C1626.4 percentage of participants
UnguidedRemitters at Week 8HAMD-1721.5 percentage of participants
UnguidedRemitters at Week 8PHQ-916.1 percentage of participants
UnguidedRemitters at Week 8QIDS-C1612.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Responders at Week 8

Definitions of the depression questionnaires are found in previous outcome measures. Definition of responder: a participant who had 50% or higher reduction in psychiatric score from baseline.

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GuidedResponders at Week 8HAMD-1743.1 percentage of participants
GuidedResponders at Week 8PHQ-950.7 percentage of participants
GuidedResponders at Week 8QIDS-C1644.4 percentage of participants
UnguidedResponders at Week 8HAMD-1726.9 percentage of participants
UnguidedResponders at Week 8PHQ-931.2 percentage of participants
UnguidedResponders at Week 8QIDS-C1623.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026