Skip to content

Comparison of Senza to Commercial Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Demonstrate Non-Inferiority of the Senza™ Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System in the Treatment of Chronic Pain as Compared to Commercially Available SCS Devices

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01609972
Acronym
SENZA-RCT
Enrollment
356
Registered
2012-06-01
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Back pain, Spinal Cord Stimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigational study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of electrical stimulation delivered to the spinal cord in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs and will be a comparison of the Senza System with commercially available SCS systems.

Interventions

DEVICESpinal Cord Stimulator

Non-inferior comparison of implantable spinal cord stimulators

Sponsors

Nevro Corp
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs (VAS ≥ 5) which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months. * Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician * Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment * Be willing and capable of giving informed consent * Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits

Exclusion criteria

* Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator * Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome, as determined by a psychologist * Have a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Have a diagnosis of scoliosis that precludes lead placement * Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker * Have prior experience with SCS * Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy * Have metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease * Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year * Have an active systemic or local infection * Be pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal) * Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency producing medications or have been a substance abuser (including alcohol and illicit drugs) * Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study * Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation * Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in back pain VAS and neurological status from Baseline3 monthsThe primary endpoint is a composite of effectiveness and safety. Specifically, the primary endpoint is the percentage of randomized subjects (the ITT analysis population) and subjects completing the Primary Efficacy Assessment (the PP analysis population) who respond to SCS therapy (as assessed by VAS) for back pain and do not have a stimulation-related neurological deficit at the Primary Efficacy Assessment (non-inferiority analysis). Subjects who do not have a successful Trial Phase are considered failures (non-responders) toward the primary endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index3, 6, 12 months
Number of subjects with adverse events12 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026