Skip to content

Irrigation Versus no Irrigation for Cutaneous Abscess

Is Routine Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Necessary?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01606657
Enrollment
201
Registered
2012-05-28
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous Abscess

Keywords

I&D, Abscess, Irrigation, Cutaneous Abscess

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators are trying to find out if washing out the abscess (pocket of pus) with fluid will help, instead of only taking out the pus. Your care will be the same as usual, except that you will be selected randomly to have your abscess washed out with fluid, or not.

Detailed description

Irrigation of the abscess cavity is commonly described as part of the procedure of incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses (1-4). Despite this, there are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate the benefit of irrigation in treatment of these abscesses. Potential disadvantages of irrigation include increased procedural time, pain, increased cost with sterile irrigation solutions and materials to capture the irrigation effluent, and increased risk of microbiologic contamination of the surrounding area. The goal of this study is to examine patients undergoing incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses to determine if irrigation of the abscess cavity affects the need for further interventions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIrrigation

The patient will receive irrigation as a part of their wound care

The patient will not receive irrigation as part of their wound care

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients 18 years of age and above 2. Patients that require a cutaneous abscess incision and drainage

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to return for 48-hour followup. 2. Patients being admitted to the hospital or going to the operating room for incision and drainage 3. Pregnant patients 4. Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients needing further treatment after irrigation for I&D7 day phone follow-upPercentage of patients needing further treatment i. Further treatment defined as 1. Repeat I&D 2. Addition of an antibiotic (as new or to a pre-existing antibiotic) 3. Admission to hospital for cutaneous abscess-related problem 1. Abscess 2. Cellulitis 3. Septic arthritis 4. Sepsis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS is correlated with decreased pain after I&Dtwo years1\) VAS post procedure pain score

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026