Skip to content

Psychotherapy Outcome and Self-selection Effects in Panic Disorder

Phase 2/3 Study of Panic Control Treatment vs Panic-Focussed Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Under Randomized and Self-Selection Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01606592
Enrollment
216
Registered
2012-05-25
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2021-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Panic Disorder (With or Without Agoraphobia)

Brief summary

The efficacy of two forms of psychotherapy with panic disordered patients, a cognitive-behavioral and a psychodynamic one, are compared under two different, randomized conditions: randomization or self-selection. The basic hypotheses are that the efficacy of both treatments is higher and that the efficacy difference is smaller under self-selection than randomized conditions.

Detailed description

After thorough assessment persons with a panic disorder diagnosis are randomly assigned to three arms: one randomization, one self-selection, and one a low-contact waiting list one. In the randomization arm (R) 95 persons are randomly assigned to Panic Control Treatment (PCT) or Panic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PFPP); in the self-selection arm (SS) 95 persons are offered, after adequate information, to choose which of the two they prefer. Twenty-six persons are initially randomized to a three-month waiting list (with sparse contact over telephone), after which they will be re-randomized, either to further randomization (to PCT or PFPP) or to self-selection. The four groups (R/PCT; R/PFPP; SS/PCT; SS/PFPP) will be compared on the basis of intake and repeated outcome/follow-up assessment.

Interventions

Manualized, 13 sessions (60 min, sometimes extended to 90-120) completed in 12-16 weeks. Total duration 840-1080 min.

BEHAVIORALPanic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PFPP)

Manualized, 19-24 sessions (45 min) completed in 12-16 weeks. Total duration 855-1080 min.

Sparse telephone contact during 12 weeks, then re-randomization

Sponsors

Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V) diagnosis of Panic Disorder, with or without Agoraphobia * Age between 18 and 60 * Willingness to stop other on-going psychotherapy treatments and to refrain from nonstudy treatments during follow up * Ability to complete the active treatment phase (not including follow-ups) within 16 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Active substance dependence (6 months remission necessary) * Current psychosis, delusions, mania, or active addiction * Acute suicidality * A history and clinical presentation of at least one clinically-significant medical condition if, due to their cognitive or physical impairments, they are unable to fully participate in the psychotherapy treatments being offered * Active involvement in a legal dispute related to their mental health issues * Three or more unexcused absences

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change on Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS; Shear et al., 1997)Growth curve analysis across intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination
Change in occupational statusGrowth curve analysis across intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination
Change in absence from work due to sicknessGrowth curve analysis across 3 months before intake, intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change on Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MI, Chambless et al, 1985)Growth curve analysis across intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination
Change on Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S; Montgomery & Asberg, 1979)Growth curve analysis across intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination
Change in health care utilization (number of medical contacts, and emergency visits, medication)Growth curve analysis across 3 months before intake, intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination
Change on Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Scale(CORE; Evans et al., 2000)Growth curve analysis across intake and follow up at termination and 6, 12 and 24 months after termination

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026