Skip to content

House Dust Mite SLIT in Elderly Patients

House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy: a Double-blind, Placebo Control Study in Elderly Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01605760
Enrollment
111
Registered
2012-05-25
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

immunotherapy, elderly

Brief summary

The safety and efficacy of specific sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite allergens in patients over 60 years of age with allergic rhinitis and a confirmed allergy to house dust mites were the focus of the stu First, 111 patients, ages 60-75 years, with allergic rhinitis and with a confirmed allergy to D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae by the use of skin prick tests, serum-specific IgE and nasal provocation tests were included. Patients were individually randomised to groups: active or placebo using a double-blind method. A total of 51 subjects in the sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) group (Staloral 300R, Stallergens, France) and 57 in the placebo group were monitored for three years. The patients had to record on a diary card whenever they used anti-allergic medications.

Interventions

DRUGimmunotherapy Staloral

Staloral (R) 300 is a sublingual solution of allergen extracts for allergen immunotherapy. During a 16 day incrementally increasing dose period, patients took daily increasing doses period, patients took 1-8 drops of the 100 IR/ml extract during the first 8 days. Then, on days 9-16, patients took 1-8 drops of the 300 IR/ml extract. Next, patients received maintenance treatment consisting of five applications of eight drops (equivalent to 0.5 mL) of 300 IR/mL extract five times a week. The mean duration of the treatment was 28.2 months (range: 3-36 months).

Sponsors

Medical University of Silesia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with allergic rhinitis who fulfilled the ARIA criterion and had a positive skin prick test (SPT), were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and had positive nasal provocation tests (NPTs) by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any of the following characteristics were excluded: * hypersensitivity to other allergens, * non-allergic rhinitis (especially senile or vasomotor rhinitis) or * severe non-stable diseases (especially bronchial asthma). However, stable coronary disease, diabetes, arterial hypertension and well-controlled, mild or atopic bronchial asthma were permitted.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse event during immunotherapythree yearSafety assessment of sublingual immunotherapy on the basis of the monitoring clinical adverse events during treatment by the use of a patient diary and medical examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of nasal symptoms after immunotherapythree yearAssessment of reducing the need for symptom-targeted drugs, primarily antihistamines and reducing of nasal symptoms during treatment in study patients (diary monitoring).

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026