Skip to content

Study Confirms or Refutes the Hypothesis That the Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate Together With the Allograft is a Better Alternative for the Posterolateral Fusion in Spine Surgery Than the Allograft Alone

Allograft Alone Versus Allograft With Bone Marrow Concentrate for the Healing of the Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01603836
Enrollment
80
Registered
2012-05-23
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spondyloarthrosis, Spondylosis

Keywords

Lumbar spine, Posterolateral fusion, Allograft, Bone marrow concentrate, Mesenchymal stem cells, Fusion rate

Brief summary

The use of autologous mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) in form of the BMC in combination with allograft is an effective option how to enhance the Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) healing. Allograft by itself is not an effective material as a posterior onlay graft for the PLF in adult surgery.

Detailed description

The study was prospective, randomized, controlled and blinded. Eighty patients with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine underwent instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral PLF. In forty cases, the PLF was done with spongious allograft chips alone (Group I). In another forty cases, spongious allograft chips were mixed with BMC (Group II), where the mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) concentration was 1.74 x104/L at average (range, 1.06-1.98 x104/L). Patients were scheduled for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and for CT scanning at 24 months after the surgery. Fusion status and the degree of mineralization of the fusion mass were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to patient group affiliation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALbone allogaft with bone marrow concentrate

In forty cases, the PLF was done with spongious allograft chips alone (Group I). In another forty cases, spongious allograft chips were mixed with BMC (Group II), where the mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) concentration was 1.74 x104/L at average (range, 1.06-1.98 x104/L). Patients were scheduled for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and for CT scanning at 24 months after the surgery. Fusion status and the degree of mineralization of the fusion mass were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to patient group affiliation.

Sponsors

Hospital Znojmo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis

Exclusion criteria

* vertebral fractures, * infections or spinal neoplasms, * non-rigid instrumentations, * medication affecting bone mineralization (e.g., corticosteroids), * body mass index higher than 35, * systemic diseases, * blood disease and/or immunosuppressant treatment and/or dicoumarol therapy; * immunosuppressant and/or neoplastic and/or infectious diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The improvement of the fusion of the posterolateral fusion measured on X-rays12 months after the surgeryPatients were scheduled for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and for CT scanning at 24 months after the surgery. Fusion status and the degree of mineralization of the fusion mass were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to patient group affiliation.
The improvement of the fusion of the posterolateral fusion measured on X-rays and CT scans.24months after the surgeryPatients were scheduled for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and for CT scanning at 24 months after the surgery. Fusion status and the degree of mineralization of the fusion mass were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to patient group affiliation.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026