Skip to content

The Use of STOPP/START Criteria for Medication Intervention Among Elderly Population Living in a Geriatric Hospital

The Use of STOPP/START Criteria for Medication Intervention and the Risk of Falls, Hospitalization, Functioning and Quality of Life Among Elderly Population Living in a Geriatric Hospital in Israel and Comparison to Beers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01602744
Acronym
STOPP
Enrollment
382
Registered
2012-05-21
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Drug Effects

Keywords

STOPP screening tool, START screening tool, MIP-medication inappropriate prescription, PIM-Potentially inappropriate medication

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of STOPP/START criteria (STOPP-screening tool of older persons potentially inappropriate prescriptions START-screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment)for medication intervention in elderly population living in a geriatric hospital will lower the number of falls,hospitalization,will improve functioning, quality of life and reduce financial costs.

Detailed description

Inappropriate prescribing is common in older people and is associated with adverse drug effects,hospitalization and falls. In this trial we want to check the efficacy of the screening tools STOPP/START which were developed and validated in order to reduce inappropriate prescribing. STOPP comprises of 65 indicators of drug-drug, drug-disease interactions and therapeutic duplication. START incorporates 22 evidence based indicators of common prescribing omissions. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that screening the medications of older patients living permanently in a geriatric hospital will improve their quality of life. The compliance of the doctor working in the geriatric hospital to the recommendations of the screening tools will also be checked.

Interventions

OTHERSTOPP/START screening tools for medication intervention

In the intervention arm the investigator will use the screening tools STOPP/START to screen the medications.

Sponsors

Wolfson Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age over 65 * live in the geriatric hospital Givaat Hashlosha permanently.

Exclusion criteria

* people with a terminal illness that will not live more than a year. * people who enter the geriatric hospital for a short while (are not permanent).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life- Mental Component Summaty (MCS)Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow upQuality of life will be measured by MOS SF-12 Health Survey questionnare. Results are expressed in terms of two meta scores: The Physical Component Summary(PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The PCS and MCS scores have a range of 0 to 100, thus scores greater than 50 represent a better than average health status.
SF-12 Health Survey questionnaire-the Physical Component Summary (PCS)Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow upQuality of life was assessed by the SF-12 Health Survey questionnare. Results are expressed in terms of two meta scores:the Physical Component Summary (PCS) AND Mental Component Summary (MCS). The PCS and MCS scores have a range of 0 to 100, thus scores greater than 50 represent a better than average health status.
FallsAt the end of the 12 month follow upAverage number of falls per year.
HospitalizationsOutcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow upThe average number of hospitalizations per year.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow upFunctioning was assessed by the FIM score. The FIM rates 18 activities of daily living on a 7 point scale ranging from fully dependent (=1) to independent (=7). A maximum score of 126 indicates functional independence and the lowest score of 18 indicates functional dependence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacoeconomics Analysis-Costs of MedicationOutcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow upThe costs on medications in the geriatric hospital before and after intervention e.g. pharmaeconomic analysis of the intervention. Costs of medications were calculated in New Israeli shekels per month and taken from the Ministry of Health's medication price list.

Countries

Israel

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data were collected on April 2012 from 382 residents' records in Givaat Hashlosha geriatric facility.23 residents were excluded for not fulfilling study entry criteria. The final study group was comprised of 359 residents. 359 residents were randomized on May 2012 to recieve either STOPP/START screening (N=183) or usual care (n=176).

Pre-assignment details

23 residents were excluded: 10 were younger than 65 years of age, one was not taking medications, 5 had a terminal illness and 7 had been on a short stay in the facility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Controll
The medications in this arm will not be screened.
176
Intervention STOPP/START
Screening medications with STOPP/START critera
183
Total359

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1715
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up138

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention STOPP/STARTControllTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
183 Participants176 Participants359 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous83.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.99
82.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
82.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Region of Enrollment
Israel
183 participants176 participants359 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
129 Participants110 Participants239 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants66 Participants120 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1760 / 183
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1760 / 183

Outcome results

Primary

Falls

Average number of falls per year.

Time frame: At the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllFalls1.26 Number of falls per yearStandard Deviation 2.4
Intervention STOPP/STARTFalls0.8 Number of falls per yearStandard Deviation 1.34
Primary

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

Functioning was assessed by the FIM score. The FIM rates 18 activities of daily living on a 7 point scale ranging from fully dependent (=1) to independent (=7). A maximum score of 126 indicates functional independence and the lowest score of 18 indicates functional dependence.

Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllFunctional Independence Measure (FIM)55.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.8
Intervention STOPP/STARTFunctional Independence Measure (FIM)54.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.1
Primary

Hospitalizations

The average number of hospitalizations per year.

Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllHospitalizations0.47 Number of hospitalizations per yearStandard Deviation 0.87
Intervention STOPP/STARTHospitalizations0.49 Number of hospitalizations per yearStandard Deviation 1.05
Primary

Quality of Life- Mental Component Summaty (MCS)

Quality of life will be measured by MOS SF-12 Health Survey questionnare. Results are expressed in terms of two meta scores: The Physical Component Summary(PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The PCS and MCS scores have a range of 0 to 100, thus scores greater than 50 represent a better than average health status.

Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllQuality of Life- Mental Component Summaty (MCS)39.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Intervention STOPP/STARTQuality of Life- Mental Component Summaty (MCS)37.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.69
Primary

SF-12 Health Survey questionnaire-the Physical Component Summary (PCS)

Quality of life was assessed by the SF-12 Health Survey questionnare. Results are expressed in terms of two meta scores:the Physical Component Summary (PCS) AND Mental Component Summary (MCS). The PCS and MCS scores have a range of 0 to 100, thus scores greater than 50 represent a better than average health status.

Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllSF-12 Health Survey questionnaire-the Physical Component Summary (PCS)33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Intervention STOPP/STARTSF-12 Health Survey questionnaire-the Physical Component Summary (PCS)33.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Secondary

Pharmacoeconomics Analysis-Costs of Medication

The costs on medications in the geriatric hospital before and after intervention e.g. pharmaeconomic analysis of the intervention. Costs of medications were calculated in New Israeli shekels per month and taken from the Ministry of Health's medication price list.

Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at the end of the 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControllPharmacoeconomics Analysis-Costs of Medication402.3 New Israeli shekels per monthStandard Deviation 291.2
Intervention STOPP/STARTPharmacoeconomics Analysis-Costs of Medication279 New Israeli shekels per monthStandard Deviation 171.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026