Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
hormone receptor positive breast cancer, endocrine, no hormone therapy, hormone, breast, cancer, neoplasm, metastatic, tumour
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to compare how treatment with Fulvestrant (FASLODEX) or Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX) effects disease progression for women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not had prior hormonal treatment.
Detailed description
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX) 500 mg with Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX) 1 mg as Hormonal Treatment for Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Not Previously Been Treated With Any Hormonal Therapy.
Interventions
2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
oral tablet 1 daily
2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
oral tablet 1 daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histological confirmation of breast cancer in post menopausal women (age \>=60). Positive hormone receptor status (ER +ve and/or PgR +ve) of primary or metastatic tumour tissue based on local laboratory assessment. * EITHER locally advanced disease (1 line of chemotherapy allowed only if remain unsuitable for therapy of curative intent) OR Metastatic disease. (1 line of chemotherapy for breast cancer allowed only if subsequent evidence of further progressive disease) * At least 1 lesion (measurable and/or non-measurable) that can be accurately assessed at baseline and is suitable for repeated assessment. * Postmenopausal women, fulfilling 1 of: * Prior bilateral oophorectomy * Age \>60 years * Age \< 60 years and amenorrheic for 12+months in the absence of chemotherapy, tamoxifen, toremifene, or ovarian suppression and FSH and oestradiol in the postmenopausal range
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of life-threatening metastatic disease * Any of: * Extensive hepatic involvement * involving brain or meninges * symptomatic pulmonary lymph spread * Discrete lung metastases are acceptable if respiratory function is not significantly compromised * Prior systemic therapy for breast cancer other than one line of cytotoxic chemotherapy (the last dose of chemotherapy must have been received more than 28 days prior to randomisation) * Radiation therapy if not completed within 28 days prior to randomisation (with the exception of radiotherapy given for control of bone pain, started prior to randomisation). Prior hormonal treatment for breast cancer. * Current or prior malignancy within previous 3 years (other than breast cancer or adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until the earliest of disease progression evident, patient dies or has surgery/radiotherapy for their disease (up to approximately 38 months) | PFS was defined as the time from randomisation until objective disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), surgery or radiotherapy to manage worsening of disease or death by any cause (in the absence of progression). Outcome measure is reported as median time from randomisation to PFS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole; Percentage of Patients With Events | Baseline (Day 0) up to data cut-off for final analysis (up to approximately 116 months). Following disease progression, patients were to be contacted at 12 weekly intervals to determine survival status | OS was defined as the time from randomisation until death by any cause. The current OS data correspond to that of the final analysis and the outcome measure is reported as percentage of patients with events. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | ORR was defined as the percentage patients with an objective response (i.e. those recording a partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\]) at some point during the study, prior to disease progression. ORR was assessed in patients with measurable disease at baseline only. The determination of measurable disease at baseline was done using baseline RECIST data. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; was any pathological lymph nodes selected as target lesions (TL) to have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
| Duration of Response (DoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | DoR was defined only for patients who had an objective response, as the time in days from date of first documentation of response (CR/PR) until date of disease progression. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; any pathological lymph nodes selected as TL to have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
| Expected Duration of Response (EDoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | EDoR was estimated using the formula EDoR = p Efp(x), where x = DoR, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65). |
| Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | CBR was defined as the percentage of patients who had a clinical benefit (i.e. best objective response of CR, PR or stable disease), that was maintained for at least 24 weeks, prior to any evidence of progression. Note that a minimum duration of 22 weeks for CBR was applicable in the analysis (rather than 24 weeks) to allow for the protocolled window of +/-2 weeks. |
| Duration of Clinical Benefit (DoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | DoCB was defined only for patients who had clinical benefit, as the time in days from date of randomisation until the date of disease progression. |
| Expected Duration of Clinical Benefit (EDoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months) | EDoCB was estimated using the formula EDoCB = p Efp(x), where x = EDoCB, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65). |
| Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Quality of life questionnaires administered at 3 months post objective disease progression, then at 6-monthly intervals (approximately 75 months) | The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire was the instrument selected to assess HRQoL and comprised of following subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), social well-being, emotional well-being, and breast cancer subscale (BCS). The main outcome measure from the FACT-B questionnaire was the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which was a summary of the following subscales: PWB, FWB, and BCS. Outcome measure is reported as median time to deterioration, defined as the interval from the date of baseline of final analysis to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 12 weeks in FACT-B TOI, or the date of death (by any cause in the absence of symptom deterioration). Time to deterioration as measured by FACT-B total score was derived similarly and is also reported. |
Countries
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
AstraZeneca
Graduate Medicine and Health School, University of Nottingham, UK
Washington University School of Medicine, USA
Participant flow
Recruitment details
First patient enrolled: 17 October 2012.
Pre-assignment details
524 patients were enrolled (signed informed consent). Patients were assigned to treatment if they met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. 62 patients were not randomised, mainly due to eligibility criteria not being fulfilled (44/62 patients) or patient decision (13/62 patients). 462 patients were randomised to receive treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg Patients received fulvestrant (Faslodex™) 500 mg, administered as two 5 mL intramuscular injections, 1 in each buttock, at each visit on Days 0, 14 (±3), 28 (±3) and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. In order to support the double-blind, double-dummy design of the trial, each patient randomised to receive fulvestrant, also received placebo to match the anastrozole schedule (tablets, once daily). | 230 |
| Anastrozole 1 mg Patients received anastrozole (Arimidex™), administered orally as a single tablet at a dose of 1 mg/day from randomisation on Day 0 and once daily thereafter. In order to support the double-blind, double-dummy design of the trial, each patient randomised to receive anastrozole also received placebo to match the fulvestrant schedule (injections on Days 0, 14 \[±3\], 28 \[±3\] and every 28 \[±3\] days thereafter). | 232 |
| Total | 462 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Anastrozole 1 mg | Total | Fulvestrant 500 mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38 | 63.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12 | 63.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 34 Participants | 70 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 15 Participants | 29 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 174 Participants | 349 Participants | 175 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 232 Participants | 462 Participants | 230 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 157 / 230 | 159 / 232 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 125 / 228 | 127 / 232 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 39 / 228 | 36 / 232 |
Outcome results
Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole
PFS was defined as the time from randomisation until objective disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), surgery or radiotherapy to manage worsening of disease or death by any cause (in the absence of progression). Outcome measure is reported as median time from randomisation to PFS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until the earliest of disease progression evident, patient dies or has surgery/radiotherapy for their disease (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomised patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole | 16.6 Months |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole | 13.8 Months |
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
CBR was defined as the percentage of patients who had a clinical benefit (i.e. best objective response of CR, PR or stable disease), that was maintained for at least 24 weeks, prior to any evidence of progression. Note that a minimum duration of 22 weeks for CBR was applicable in the analysis (rather than 24 weeks) to allow for the protocolled window of +/-2 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomised patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 78.3 Percentage of participants |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 74.1 Percentage of participants |
Comparison of Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole; Percentage of Patients With Events
OS was defined as the time from randomisation until death by any cause. The current OS data correspond to that of the final analysis and the outcome measure is reported as percentage of patients with events.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to data cut-off for final analysis (up to approximately 116 months). Following disease progression, patients were to be contacted at 12 weekly intervals to determine survival status
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomised patients. Date of death of 2 participants were unknown in the Anastrozole 1mg arm, hence they were censored for OS analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Comparison of Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole; Percentage of Patients With Events | 68.3 Percentage of patients |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Comparison of Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole; Percentage of Patients With Events | 67.7 Percentage of patients |
Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire was the instrument selected to assess HRQoL and comprised of following subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), social well-being, emotional well-being, and breast cancer subscale (BCS). The main outcome measure from the FACT-B questionnaire was the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which was a summary of the following subscales: PWB, FWB, and BCS. Outcome measure is reported as median time to deterioration, defined as the interval from the date of baseline of final analysis to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 12 weeks in FACT-B TOI, or the date of death (by any cause in the absence of symptom deterioration). Time to deterioration as measured by FACT-B total score was derived similarly and is also reported.
Time frame: Quality of life questionnaires administered at 3 months post objective disease progression, then at 6-monthly intervals (approximately 75 months)
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomised patients.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Time to TOI deterioration | 14.1 months |
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Time to FACT-B total score deterioration | 13.8 months |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Time to TOI deterioration | 11.1 months |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Comparison of the Effect of Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment on Time to Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Time to FACT-B total score deterioration | 11.1 months |
Duration of Clinical Benefit (DoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
DoCB was defined only for patients who had clinical benefit, as the time in days from date of randomisation until the date of disease progression.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: Only patients in the ITT analysis set (which included all randomised patients) who also had a clinical benefit were included in the DoCB analysis (n=180 for Fulvestrant arm and n=172 for Anastrozole arm).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Duration of Clinical Benefit (DoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 22.1 Months |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Duration of Clinical Benefit (DoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 19.1 Months |
Duration of Response (DoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
DoR was defined only for patients who had an objective response, as the time in days from date of first documentation of response (CR/PR) until date of disease progression. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; any pathological lymph nodes selected as TL to have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: Only patients in the ITT analysis set (which included all randomised patients), who also had an objective response and had measurable disease at baseline were included in the DoR analysis (n=89 for Fulvestrant arm and n=88 for Anastrozole arm).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Duration of Response (DoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 20.0 Months |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Duration of Response (DoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 13.2 Months |
Expected Duration of Clinical Benefit (EDoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
EDoCB was estimated using the formula EDoCB = p Efp(x), where x = EDoCB, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65).
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomised patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Expected Duration of Clinical Benefit (EDoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 667.94 Days |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Expected Duration of Clinical Benefit (EDoCB) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 532.04 Days |
Expected Duration of Response (EDoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
EDoR was estimated using the formula EDoR = p Efp(x), where x = DoR, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65).
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: EDoR analysis was based on the number of patients in the ITT analysis set (which included all randomised patients) who had measurable disease at baseline (n=193 for Fulvestrant arm and n=196 for Anastrozole arm).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Expected Duration of Response (EDoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 346.84 Days |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Expected Duration of Response (EDoR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 227.58 Days |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment
ORR was defined as the percentage patients with an objective response (i.e. those recording a partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\]) at some point during the study, prior to disease progression. ORR was assessed in patients with measurable disease at baseline only. The determination of measurable disease at baseline was done using baseline RECIST data. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; was any pathological lymph nodes selected as target lesions (TL) to have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
Population: Percentages for ORR were calculated based on the number of patients in the ITT analysis set (which included all randomised patients) who had measurable disease at baseline (n=193 for Fulvestrant arm and n=196 for Anastrozole arm).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Fulvestrant 500 mg | Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 46.1 Percentage of participants |
| Anastrozole 1 mg | Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Fulvestrant Treatment Versus Anastrozole Treatment | 44.9 Percentage of participants |