Skip to content

Validation of the AVAPS AE Algorithm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

Validation of the AVAPS AE Algorithm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Non-randomised Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01601977
Acronym
AVAPS-AE
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-05-18
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2016-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, OSA

Keywords

COPD, Respiratory failure, NIV, OSA

Brief summary

COPD continues to be a cause of major morbidity for patients. Those patients who also have respiratory failure and obstructive sleep apnoea are at higher risk of exacerbations and death and have worse health related quality of life than similar COPD patients without respiratory failure. Treatment options in this group of patients have been limited and data to support the use of machines to assist breathing (non-invasive ventilators) in stable patients are limited. A major limitation of these devices has been patient acceptance and achieving sufficient control of sleep breathing disturbance. Currently devices are set at a fixed pressure to support the breathing throughout the night. The new software within the trial device will aim to better match the support provided by the machine to that needed by the patient. It is hoped that this may offer enhanced comfort as well as superior control of respiratory failure.

Detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment options for COPD patients consist of medications, such as bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs, pulmonary rehabilitation, long term oxygen therapy (LTOT), lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation. Studies have shown that bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs show minor or no benefit on long term outcomes but rather are used mainly for symptomatic relief.1 Pulmonary rehabilitation has been demonstrated to improve functional status and symptoms but there is lacking evidence on long term outcomes of this therapy. 2 Lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation is only appropriate for a small number of patients; therefore, there is no demonstration of improved long-term survival rate.3, 4 Of these available therapies, few have been shown to significantly improve long term patient outcomes. For the severe COPD patient, LTOT is the only treatment that demonstrated prolonged survival in controlled studies. 5, 6 But, despite the effectiveness of LTOT, COPD is still characterized by a high morbidity and mortality rate. Although the treatment of OSA with CPAP therapy has been associated with reduced hospital admissions and exacerbations there are possible adverse consequences on pulmonary mechanics due to exacerbating hyperinflation. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is one therapy that may prove beneficial to stable COPD patients. NPPV is the use of positive pressure ventilation administered via a nasal or full face mask (that covers both the nose and mouth). This type of ventilation has become a well established and increasingly used therapeutic option for patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF) due to COPD.7 NPPV, used nocturnally, may improve nighttime hypoventilation that is common with COPD patients. An improvement in nocturnal hypoventilation would reset the respiratory center sensitivity for CO2.8 9 This would result in an improvement in daytime gas exchange and sleep quality. It is also known that hyperinflation in patients with COPD increases their work of breathing, thus fatiguing the respiratory muscles.10 It has been suggested that by applying nocturnal NPPV it would allow the respiratory muscles to rest, resulting in muscle function recovery, increased muscle strength, reduced tendency for fatigue and improvement in pulmonary function and gas exchange.11 AVAPS AE AVAPS AE is a mode of therapy (Philips Respironics Inc, Monroeville, PA, USA) with potential advantages over the currently established modes of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP and bilevel therapy). This mode of therapy incorporates AVAPS (automated adjustable IPAP setting to maintain target ventilation with a settable rate of change), AutoEPAP and Auto Back up Rate. In particular the automated EPAP algorithm will ensure optimal upper airway patency without exacerbating hyperinflation. In this study, we are evaluating the AVAPS AE mode as compared to the participant's current mode of ventilation. We believe that these automated parameters will allow better nocturnal ventilatory control to offset the differing elastic and resistive loads imposed by changes in body position during sleep. Furthermore, AVAPS AE will counter the changing ventilatory requirements due to alterations in lung volumes and airway resistance during different stages of sleep. In summary, the AVAPS AE mode will enable automatic adjustment in response to ventilatory changes throughout the night. Study Objective The objective of this study is to validate the performance of the AVAPS AE therapy in COPD-OSA overlap patients during nocturnal ventilation.

Interventions

DEVICEAVAPS-AE

Novel ventilation mode (Omnilab - AVAPS AE algorithm)

DEVICEUsual care

Non-invasive ventilation with standard ventilator

Sponsors

Philips Respironics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Patrick Murphy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 21 * Diagnosis of COPD * Currently using Bilevel device for COPD-OSA overlap syndrome * Ability to provide consent * Documentation of medical stability by PI

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects, who are acutely ill, medically complicated or who are medically unstable. * Subjects in whom PAP therapy is otherwise medically contraindicated. * Subjects who have had surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days. * Subjects with untreated, non-OSA sleep disorders, including but not limited to; insomnia, periodic limb movement syndrome, or restless legs syndrome (PLMI \> 10).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Control of Nocturnal Hypoventilationbaseline, 6 week assessmenttranscutaneous CO2 recording from overnight sleep study whilst using the device at 6 weeks compared to baseline control when using usual device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Sleep Timebaseline, 6 weeksFull polysomnography performed at baseline (usual device) and 6 weeks (trial device) to examine TST
Health Related Quality of Life2 weeksSevere Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (minimum 0, maximum 100)
Control of Nocturnal Hypoventilation2 weeksmean tcCO2
Exercise Capacity6 weeks6 minute walk test
Exacerbation Frequency6 weekspatient reported exacerbations following 6 weeks of device usage

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients approached in ventilation clinic and assessed for trial participation. Patients were recruited and scheduled for trial initiation. Once 10 patients completed the study protocol the remaining recruited patients did not start the assessment period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Single arm crossover nonrandomised study
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Control of Nocturnal Hypoventilation

transcutaneous CO2 recording from overnight sleep study whilst using the device at 6 weeks compared to baseline control when using usual device

Time frame: baseline, 6 week assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionControl of Nocturnal Hypoventilation6.5 kPaStandard Deviation 1.6
Usual CareControl of Nocturnal Hypoventilation6.7 kPaStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Control of Nocturnal Hypoventilation

mean tcCO2

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionControl of Nocturnal Hypoventilation6.4 kPaStandard Deviation 1.7
Usual CareControl of Nocturnal Hypoventilation6.5 kPaStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Exacerbation Frequency

patient reported exacerbations following 6 weeks of device usage

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionExacerbation Frequency0 exacerbations
Usual CareExacerbation Frequency0 exacerbations
Secondary

Exercise Capacity

6 minute walk test

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: 1 patient declined to complete the walking test

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionExercise Capacity190 mStandard Deviation 63
Usual CareExercise Capacity175 mStandard Deviation 72
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life

Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (minimum 0, maximum 100)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionHealth Related Quality of Life60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Usual CareHealth Related Quality of Life59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life

Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (minimum 0, maximum 100)

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionHealth Related Quality of Life61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Usual CareHealth Related Quality of Life59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Total Sleep Time

Full polysomnography performed at baseline (usual device) and 6 weeks (trial device) to examine TST

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTotal Sleep Time330 minutesStandard Deviation 72
Usual CareTotal Sleep Time306 minutesStandard Deviation 72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026