Skip to content

Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Endoscopic Band Ligation vs Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01601639
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-05-18
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2017-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia

Keywords

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia, Argon plasma Coagulation, Endoscopic Band Ligation, GAVE

Brief summary

The investigators goal is to compare the standard argon plasma coagulation (APC) treatment with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in patients with Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia.

Detailed description

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a vascular structural malformation in the stomach that can lead to active or chronic intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic iron-deficiency anemia. The current standard endoscopic treatment is with APC. There have been multiple reports and case series in the literature about successful treatment with EBL for GAVE, even in cases where APC was unsuccessful for treatment of GAVE. Our goal is to compare the standard APC treatment with EBL in patients with Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia.

Interventions

Endoscopic band ligation device: 6 Shooter Saeed Multi-Band Ligator (Cook Medical/Endoscopy)

DEVICEArgon plasma Coagulation (APC) for GAVE

APC treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) Argon plasma coagulation device: ERBE VIO 300D (Elektromedizin GmBH)

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive patients with GAVE identified at endoscopic examination, patients may have active GI bleeding, chronic anemia or drop in hemoglobin levels.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with previous endoscopic treatment for GAVE within the last 3 months, patients with GAVE without chronic anemia or active bleeding, patients in whom another possible source of GI bleeding is found

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New event of upper gastrointestinal bleedingone yearNumber of new episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding characterized by melena, hematemesis or quick and significant drop in hemoglobin levels will be documented after the first session of therapy.The hemoglobin level will be recorded before the procedure and 4,8,and 12 weeks after the first endoscopic treatment for GAVE to document changes from baseline. Patients showing stabilization of hemoglobin levels (no significant drop or improvement in levels) without other signs of gastrointestinal bleeding will be considered as treatment success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of sessions required for GAVE eradicationone yearThe total number of endoscopic sessions required for total disappearance of the gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE)
Total procedure timeone yearThe investigators will document the total endoscopy time required for each procedure to compare between the two devices
Blood transfusion requirementsone yearThe number of blood transfusions will be documented for each patient before and after the endoscopic treatment
Iron studiesone yearIron levels changes in blood serum will be monitored throughout the study.
Ferritinone yearChanges in ferritin levels will be monitored during the study

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026