Skip to content

Reliability of the Facial Wrinkle Scale in Japanese Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01600729
Enrollment
66
Registered
2012-05-17
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2013-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Rhytides

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Facial Wrinkle Scale with Asian Photonumeric Guide (FWS-A) in Japanese subjects.

Interventions

DRUGNo Intervention

No intervention.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to assess facial lines in a mirror * Removal of facial jewelry and makeup for study visit

Exclusion criteria

* Infection or skin disorder affecting the face * Planned use of botulinum toxin of any serotype between Screening and Day 1 * Planned facial cosmetic procedure between Screening and Day 1 * Planned excessive/prolonged sun exposure between Screening and Day 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Day 1Inter-rater (among raters) agreement of the FWS-A scores (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe) was evaluated by Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 66 participant's severity of facial lines in 4 areas (Glabellar Lines, Forehead Lines, Crow's Feet Lines on the Left side of the face and Crow's Feet Lines on the Right side of the face) at rest and maximum expression using the FWS-A scale. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤ 0= poor, 0.00-0.20= slight, 0.21-0.40= fair, 0.41-0.60= moderate, 0.61-0.80= substantial and 0.81-1.00= almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics was provided.
Intra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Day 1Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the FWS-A scores (0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe) was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (WKS). WKS were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 65 participant's severity of facial lines in 4 areas (Glabellar Lines, Forehead Lines, Crow's Feet Lines on the Left side of the face and Crow's Feet Lines on the Right side of the face) at rest and maximum expression using the FWS-A scale at 2 different time-points on Day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for WKS for all raters combined was estimated by pooling WKS for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of WKS was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for WKS was provided.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants with facial lines. There was no intervention in this study.
66
Total66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age Continuous52.5 Years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Inter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)

Inter-rater (among raters) agreement of the FWS-A scores (0= none; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe) was evaluated by Kappa statistics. Kappa statistics were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 66 participant's severity of facial lines in 4 areas (Glabellar Lines, Forehead Lines, Crow's Feet Lines on the Left side of the face and Crow's Feet Lines on the Right side of the face) at rest and maximum expression using the FWS-A scale. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤ 0= poor, 0.00-0.20= slight, 0.21-0.40= fair, 0.41-0.60= moderate, 0.61-0.80= substantial and 0.81-1.00= almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics was provided.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Reliability population included all enrolled participants with at least 1 assessment by at least 1 live rater performed on day 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Forehead Lines at Rest0.653 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Glabellar Lines at Rest0.637 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Left Side at Rest0.647 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Right Side at Rest0.654 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Forehead Lines at Maximum Brow Elevation0.527 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown0.507 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Left Side at Maximum Smile0.641 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsInter-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Right Side at Maximum Smile0.622 Kappa statistics
Primary

Intra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)

Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the FWS-A scores (0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe) was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (WKS). WKS were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 65 participant's severity of facial lines in 4 areas (Glabellar Lines, Forehead Lines, Crow's Feet Lines on the Left side of the face and Crow's Feet Lines on the Right side of the face) at rest and maximum expression using the FWS-A scale at 2 different time-points on Day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for WKS for all raters combined was estimated by pooling WKS for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of WKS was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for WKS was provided.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Participants from the Reliability population (all enrolled participants with at least 1 assessment by at least 1 live rater performed on day 1) who had 2 assessments on Day 1 available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown0.770 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Forehead Lines at Rest0.886 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Glabellar Lines at Rest0.861 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Left Side at Rest0.841 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Right Side at Rest0.838 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Forehead Lines at Maximum Brow Elevation0.810 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Left Side at Maximum Smile0.836 Kappa statistics
All ParticipantsIntra-rater Reliability of Assessment of Facial Lines Using the 4-Point Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS-A)Crow's Feet Right Side at Maximum Smile0.832 Kappa statistics

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026