Skip to content

Detection of Liver Fibrosis With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Prospective Detection of Liver Fibrosis With MRI Compared to Fibroscan and Blood Tests

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01600105
Enrollment
276
Registered
2012-05-16
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2020-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Liver Disease

Keywords

liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, magnetic resonance imaging

Brief summary

Patients with chronic liver disease are at high risk of developing liver scarring (fibrosis), with ultimate risks of cirrhosis and liver cancer that may require liver transplant. The investigators would like to develop non invasive advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques (MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography) to assess the degree of liver damage in patients with chronic liver disease. These techniques combined could reach high diagnostic performance for detection of liver fibrosis; and could decrease the number of liver biopsies, which have risks and sample only a small portion of the liver.

Detailed description

Patients with chronic hepatitis have increased risks of liver damage, including fibrosis and cirrhosis, which may eventually lead to hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. These diseases are/will be the source of enormous health care costs and morbidity/mortality in the US. Most hepatologists still rely on liver biopsy findings in patients newly diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, which enables the assessment of liver damage (fibrosis and inflammation). Liver biopsy has limitations, including cost, invasiveness, poor patient acceptance, limited sampling, inter-observer variability and is difficult to repeat. Non invasive tests to capture the extent of liver damage at a larger scale are urgently needed. These will gain more acceptance among patients and hepatologists. In this proposal, the investigators would like to test and validate non invasive MRI methods based on advanced MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography techniques for the detection of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. In order to improve the diagnostic performance of MRI, the investigators would like to build and validate a predictive model based on advanced functional MRI metrics (diffusion, perfusion and elastography). If validated, this novel non invasive algorithm will not only decreases the number of liver biopsies, but also enable earlier diagnosis of liver fibrosis when antiviral treatment is more effective, and enable a comprehensive evaluation of the liver (to assess for cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatocellular cancer). This could significantly reduce the cost of care, could become a useful tool for testing new antifibrogenic and antiviral drugs in chronic viral hepatitis, and could be used to follow patients for detection of progression to cirrhosis.

Interventions

DRUGPerfusion MRI

1\) Assess the role of a new FDA approved blood pool gadolinium contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus) for the measurement of liver MR Perfusion, compared to extra-cellular contrast agents.

Sponsors

Bachir Taouli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic liver disease (including viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, non alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, etc..) * 18 years of age and older * Liver biopsy (percutaneous or transjugular or surgical) performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care. * Liver transplant or liver resection performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care. * Patient is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample Control group * Patients without history of liver disease and healthy volunteers * 18 years of age and older * Subject is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Unable or unwilling to give informed consent * Contra-indications to MRI * Electrical implants such as cardiac pacemakers or perfusion pumps * Ferromagnetic implants such as aneurysm clips, surgical clips, prostheses, artificial hearts, valves with steel parts, metal fragments, shrapnel, tattoos near the eye, or steel implants * Ferromagnetic objects such as jewelry or metal clips in clothing * Pregnant subjects * Pre-existing medical conditions including a likelihood of developing seizures or claustrophobic reactions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PV FlowFasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.
PV VelocityFasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.
LS-MRE for Sub-Study IFasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.
True Diffusion Parameter (D)Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) ScanSub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study IIFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
LS-TEFasting transient elastography, average duration 10 minSub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
MTTFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Liver DVFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Liver Upslope From DCE-MRIFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Spleen TTPFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PHFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg
LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study IIIFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Spleen VolumeFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
Spleen Caudocranial DiameterFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
PH Imaging ScoreFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
LSLUFasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in May 2010, with enrollment from October 2010 through February 2017. Patients were recruited from the Division of Liver Diseases or from the Surgical Oncology Clinic at Mount Sinai.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Perfusion MRI
chronic liver disease who underwent/will undergo liver biopsy or will undergo liver transplant or liver resection as part of standard care during the previous 6 months. Perfusion MRI: 1) Assess the role of a new FDA approved blood pool gadolinium contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus) for the measurement of liver MR Perfusion, compared to extra-cellular contrast agents.
214
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers in Sub study I only
11
Total225

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Sub Study IInsufficient image quality010
Sub Study IIInsufficient image quality30
Sub Study IINo images in PACS10
Sub Study IIWithdrawal by Subject10
Sub Study IIIInsufficient image quality50
Sub Study VPoor Image Quality20
Total ParticipantsInsufficient image quality3010
Total ParticipantsNo images in PACS100
Total ParticipantsWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPerfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Age, Continuous53.8 years30.6 years51.8 years
Age, Customized
Sub Study I Chronic Hepatitis C patients
55.8 years30.6 years46.5 years
Age, Customized
Sub Study II
55 years55 years
Age, Customized
Sub Study III
53 years53 years
Age, Customized
Sub Study IV
53 years29 years48 years
Age, Customized
Sub Study V
57 years57 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
31 Participants1 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
20 Participants5 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
38 Participants2 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
20 Participants0 Participants20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
105 Participants3 Participants108 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Chronic Hepatitis C patients
Female
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Chronic Hepatitis C patients
Male
17 Participants6 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants5 Participants88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants6 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 110 / 600 / 340 / 124
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 112 / 600 / 342 / 124
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 110 / 600 / 340 / 124

Outcome results

Primary

LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II

Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Only 38 participants had suitable MRE quality for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study IIF0-F22.88 kPaStandard Deviation 0.91
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study IIF3-F45.16 kPaStandard Deviation 0.95
Primary

LS-MRE for Sub-Study I

Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.

Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

Population: Sub Study I with 30 participants. The method failed in 3 of the patients, so no usable LS-MRE data was generated. 27 patients had usable data for PV flow and velocity, so they were included in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE for Sub-Study IFasting4.9 kPaStandard Deviation 1.4
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE for Sub-Study IPostprandial5.0 kPaStandard Deviation 1.2
Healthy VolunteersLS-MRE for Sub-Study IFasting1.8 kPaStandard Deviation 0.2
Healthy VolunteersLS-MRE for Sub-Study IPostprandial2.0 kPaStandard Deviation 0.2
Primary

LS-TE

Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame: Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min

Population: Only 46 participants had suitable TE quality for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-TEF0-F29.55 kPaStandard Deviation 6.85
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-TEF3-F421.44 kPaStandard Deviation 17.86
Primary

MTT

Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Only 50 participants had suitable quality MRI for analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsMTTF0-F211.6 secondsStandard Deviation 8.1
Chronic Hep C PatientsMTTF3-F418.8 secondsStandard Deviation 9.1
Primary

PV Flow

Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.

Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsPV FlowFasting16.0 ml/sStandard Deviation 6.1
Chronic Hep C PatientsPV FlowPostprandial23.2 ml/sStandard Deviation 8.5
Healthy VolunteersPV FlowFasting15.5 ml/sStandard Deviation 4.2
Healthy VolunteersPV FlowPostprandial27.1 ml/sStandard Deviation 10.2
Primary

PV Velocity

Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.

Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsPV VelocityFasting10.5 cm/sStandard Deviation 3.2
Chronic Hep C PatientsPV VelocityPostprandial12.8 cm/sStandard Deviation 4.6
Healthy VolunteersPV VelocityFasting11.5 cm/sStandard Deviation 2.8
Healthy VolunteersPV VelocityPostprandial14.4 cm/sStandard Deviation 3.2
Primary

True Diffusion Parameter (D)

Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan

Population: 3 participants with scans not evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsTrue Diffusion Parameter (D)F0-F21.06 10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.21
Chronic Hep C PatientsTrue Diffusion Parameter (D)F3-F40.94 10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Liver DV

Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Among the 34 patients, 2 patients did not have DCE-MRI acquisition due to chronic renal insufficiency, 4 patients had non-usable DCE-MRI data because of major artifacts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver DVHVPG<10mmHg47.28 percentage of liver volumeStandard Deviation 24.29
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver DVHVPG>=10mmHg77.25 percentage of liver volumeStandard Deviation 111.01
Secondary

Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH

Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Among the 34 patients, 2 patients did not have DCE-MRI acquisition due to chronic renal insufficiency, 4 patients had non-usable DCE-MRI data because of major artifacts..

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Time to Peak (TTP) for PHHVPG<5mmHg40.99 secondsStandard Deviation 22.2
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Time to Peak (TTP) for PHHVPG>=5mmHg53.02 secondsStandard Deviation 31.8
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Time to Peak (TTP) for PHHVPG<10mmHg41.47 secondsStandard Deviation 25.76
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Time to Peak (TTP) for PHHVPG>=10mmHg69.45 secondsStandard Deviation 41.98
Secondary

Liver Upslope From DCE-MRI

Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Among the 34 patients, 2 patients did not have DCE-MRI acquisition due to chronic renal insufficiency, 4 patients had non-usable DCE-MRI data because of major artifacts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Upslope From DCE-MRIHVPG <5mmHg0.011 mmol/(L.s))Standard Deviation 0.011
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Upslope From DCE-MRIHVPG>=5mmHg0.0007 mmol/(L.s))Standard Deviation 0.0007
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Upslope From DCE-MRIHPVG<10mmHg0.011 mmol/(L.s))Standard Deviation 0.007
Chronic Hep C PatientsLiver Upslope From DCE-MRIHPVG>=10mmHg0.0006 mmol/(L.s))Standard Deviation 0.004
Secondary

LSLU

Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: 31 of the 34 participants had LS-MRE and 28 of the 34 participants had Liver Upslope measurement from DCE-MRI

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLSLUHVPG<5mmHg192.72 kPa*s*L/mmolStandard Deviation 195.65
Chronic Hep C PatientsLSLUHVPG>=5mmHg830.28 kPa*s*L/mmolStandard Deviation 971.68
Chronic Hep C PatientsLSLUHVPG<10mmHg363.68 kPa*s*L/mmolStandard Deviation 855.01
Chronic Hep C PatientsLSLUHVPG>10mmHg871.82 kPa*s*L/mmolStandard Deviation 1354.31
Secondary

LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III

Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: MRE was successful for liver stiffness measurements in 31 participants of the 34

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study IIIHVPG<5mmHg2.31 kPaStandard Deviation 2.8
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study IIIHVPG>=5mmHg5.14 kPaStandard Deviation 2.57
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study IIIHVPG<10mmHg3.88 kPaStandard Deviation 3.16
Chronic Hep C PatientsLS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study IIIHVPG>=10mmHg5.86 kPaStandard Deviation 6.71
Secondary

PH Imaging Score

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Sub Study III with 34 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsPH Imaging ScoreHVPG<5mmHg0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Chronic Hep C PatientsPH Imaging ScoreHVPG>=5mmHg2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.25
Chronic Hep C PatientsPH Imaging ScoreHVPG<101 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Chronic Hep C PatientsPH Imaging ScoreHVPG>=104 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Spleen Caudocranial Diameter

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Sub Study III with 34 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen Caudocranial DiameterHVPG<5mmHg11.6 cmStandard Deviation 2.8
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen Caudocranial DiameterHVPG>=5mmHg14.0 cmStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

Spleen TTP

Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Among the 34 patients, 2 patients did not have DCE-MRI acquisition due to chronic renal insufficiency, 4 patients had non-usable DCE-MRI data because of major artifacts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen TTPHVPG<10mmHg15.46 secondsStandard Deviation 16.65
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen TTPHVPG>=10mmHg44.90 secondsStandard Deviation 40.69
Secondary

Spleen Volume

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Population: Sub Study III with 34 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen VolumeHVPG<5mmHg246 cm^3Standard Deviation 252
Chronic Hep C PatientsSpleen VolumeHVPG>=5mmHg441 cm^3Standard Deviation 629

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026