Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, Gait, walking
Brief summary
Many of the 780,000 people affected by stroke each year are left with slow, asymmetric walking patterns. The proposed project will evaluate the effectiveness of two competing motor learning approaches to restore symmetric gait for faster, more efficient, and safer walking.
Detailed description
Walking after stroke is characterized by reduced gait speed and the presence of interlimb spatiotemporal asymmetry. These step length and stance time asymmetries can be energy inefficient, challenge balance control, increase the risk of falls and injury, and limit functional mobility. Current rehabilitation to improve gait is based on one of two competing motor learning strategies: minimizing or augmenting symmetry errors during training. Conventional rehabilitation often involves walking on a treadmill while therapists attempt to minimize symmetry errors during training. Although this approach can successfully improve gait speed, it does not produce long-term changes in symmetry. Conversely, augmenting or amplifying symmetry errors has been produced by walking on a split belt treadmill with the belts set at different fixed speeds. While this approach produced an 'after-effect' resulting in step length symmetry for short periods of time, with some evidence of long term learning in people with stroke, it had no influence on stance time asymmetry. The investigators propose that patients need real-time proprioceptive feedback of symmetry errors so that they are actively engaged in the learning process. For this project, the investigators developed and validated a novel, responsive, 'closed loop' control system, using a split-belt instrumented treadmill that continuously adjusts the difference in belt speeds to be proportional to the patient's current asymmetry. Using this system, the investigators can either augment or minimize asymmetry on a step-by-step basis to determine which motor learning strategy produces the largest improvement in overground spatiotemporal symmetry.
Interventions
OTHERSame Belt Speeds
18 sessions of training (3X/week). 20 minutes/session on treadmill; 10 minutes/session overground 70-75%HRmax. Control-Dual-belted treadmill belts respond to encourage symmetric gait
OTHERDifferent Belt Speeds
18 sessions of training (3X/week). 20 minutes/session on treadmill; 10 minutes/session overground 70-75%HRmax. Treadmill belts of dual-belted treadmill respond either to amplify asymmetric gait or encourage symmetric gait.
Sponsors
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ability to walk \>10 m overground without physical assistance * overground comfortable gait speed (CGS) \< 1.0 m/s (using assistive devices and bracing below the knee as needed) * able to walk independently on the treadmill at \>80% CGS * exhibits stance time and/or step length asymmetry during CGS
Exclusion criteria
* cerebellar lesion * uncontrolled cardiorespiratory/metabolic disease (cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, orthostatic hypertension, chronic emphysema)or other neurological or orthopedic disorders that may affect gait training * botulinum toxin to the lower limb in the past 6 months * a history of balance deficits or unexplained falls not related to the stroke * uncontrolled seizures * concurrent physical therapy * Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) \< 24 * communication impairments which could impede understanding of the purpose or procedures of the study or an inability to comply with experimental procedures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in spatiotemporal gait symmetry after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Spatiotemporal gait symmetry is calculated as a ratio of paretic to non-paretic measures after walking over a pressure sensitive mat. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in balance after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Balance will be assessed using the Berg Balance Scale, 4square step test, and the Functional Gait Assessment |
| Change from baseline in endurance after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Endurance will be measured as the distance walked (in meters) during the 6 Minute Walk Test |
| Change from baseline in quality of life after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Quality of Life will be assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale |
| Change from baseline in metabolic efficiency after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Metabolic efficiency is measured as the metabolic cost of transport (MCOT) using a portable metabolic cart to assess cardiorespiratory gas exchange during the 6 Minute Walk Test. |
| Change from baseline in community ambulation after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Community ambulation is assessed using Step Watch Monitors (SAMs) which will be worn daily for a minimum of 7 days during waking hours. |
| Change from baseline in gait speed at 1 month follow-up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Gait speed is measured in m/sec by having participants walk across a 14' pressure sensitive mat. |
| Change from baseline in gait speed after 6 weeks of training | participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks | Gait speed is measured in m/sec by having participants walk across a 14' pressure sensitive mat. |
| Change from baseline in endurance at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Endurance will be measured as the distance walked (in meters) during the 6 Minute Walk Test |
| Change from baseline in quality of life at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Quality of Life will be assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale |
| Change from baseline in metabolic efficiency at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Metabolic efficiency is measured as the metabolic cost of transport (MCOT) using a portable metabolic cart to assess cardiorespiratory gas exchange during the 6 Minute Walk Test. |
| Change from baseline in community ambulation at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Community ambulation is assessed using Step Watch Monitors (SAMs) which will be worn daily for a minimum of 7 days during waking hours. |
| Change from baseline in spatiotemporal gait asymmetry at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Spatiotemporal gait symmetry is calculated as a ratio of paretic to non-paretic measures after walking over a pressure sensitive mat. |
| Change from baseline in balance at 1 month follow up | participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks | Balance will be assessed using the Berg Balance Scale, 4square step test, and the Functional Gait Assessment |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed