Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognitive remediation therapy, cognition, quality of life
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy is effective in the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.
Detailed description
Schizophrenia can be considered a chronic illness that affects all aspects of daily life. Cognitive deficits seems to play a key role that interferes directly in the functional adaptation. Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) emerges as a psychological intervention that target cognitive impairment. But, the use of computerized or papel an pencil procedures for remediation cognitive deficits remains controversial. Nonetheless, computer tasks offer a number of advantages compared to those of paper and pencil. The most noteworthy advantages are to enhance patient's motivation just because the sensory variety that the exercises presented or the possibility to provide immediate feedback. Furthermore, the possibility to present custom-tailored and adapted tasks taking into accounts the patients deficits and their evolution in the process of the psychological therapy is another important feature of computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALComputer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy
Comparison of two groups: The experimental group performs 48 sessions of computer exercices designed to remedy cognitive domains(attention, speed of processing, working memory,reasoning and problem solving) frequently affected in schizophrenia. The intervention has a period 6 months , two sessions a week. All exercises provided a visual or verbal feedback to immediately terminate the execution.In addition to, the therapist after the sessions interactively explain the results and the strategies employed by the patient.
OTHERattentional task
The Control group performs 48 sessions of watching videos and answer questions about these videos, in a period of 6 months , two sessions a week.
Sponsors
Gemma Garrido García
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* DSM-IV (APA, 1994)criteria for schizophrenia disorder * Estimated IQ of 85 or superior by Vocabulary subtest, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) * Patients were considered sufficiently stable if they had a Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)score of 40 or superior and they maintained a stable dose and type of psychiatric medication for at least 1 moth prior to inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
* Non presence of cognitive impairment confirmed by neurocognitive assessment * Traumatic brain injury or history of neurologic illness. * Electroconvulsive therapy in the last year. * Psychiatric comorbidity. * Plan to change medication during the trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in neurocognitive outcomes | Change from Baseline in neurocognitive measures up to the end of intervention at 6 months | Attention:Continuous Performance TestII(CPT II)d'índex, Psychomotor Speed:Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; Smith, 1973,2002). Phonemic fluency FAS test (Benton & Hamsher 1976, 1989).Working Memory: Subtest Letter-Number Sequencing (WAIS-III):Verbal Learning:California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT, Delis et al 2000)short- term and long-term free recall.Executive function: Wisconsing Card Sorting Test(WCST; R.Heaton computer version CV3) categories and perseverations, Stroop test ( Stroop Color and Word Test; Stroop,1935; Golden,1994) , Matrix Reasoning (Adult Intelligence Scale-III ;WAIS-III). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in functional outcomes | Change from Baseline in functional measures up to the end of intervention at 6 months | The Heinrichs -Carpenter Quality of life Scale.(QLS, Heinrichs,1982; Spanish version Rodríguez et al.1995).QLS are divided in four subscales socialactivity, interpersonal relations,instrumental role functioning,intrapsychic functioning,and use of objects and participation.The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES,Rosenbeg,1965) were used as a indicator of an attitude of being good enough on 10 items |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed